That is just awful Marilyn…Look at what the Judge is trying to do to me…the pretender lender wants to enter the “original” note into evidence with no documentation…no affadavit…and the Judge said ok……and gave me 21 days to answer to that….

Two separate copies of the note were filed in the court…the first copy of the note did NOT have the stamp “PAY TO THE ORDER ……WITHOUT RECOURSE…..SIGNED BY WAMU…IT JUST HAD A BIG ‘ X ‘ BELOW THE SIGNATURE…TOLD BY JUDGE TO REFILE WITH PROPER DOCUMENTS……….THE SECOND SET OF DOCUMENTS RE-FILED IN COURT HAS THE STAMP ON THE BACK OF NOTE BELOW THE SIGNATURE……….PAY TO THE ORDER …….WITHOUT RECOURSE….WAMU AND SIGNED…..AND NO BIG ‘ X ‘ ON THAT COPY…..IN THE BLANK SPACE THERE IS A FAINT…VERY FAINT STAMP UNABLE TO READ……..
NO WHERE DID THE COMMENT STATE ‘ ORIGINAL ‘….IT STATED ‘ COPY ‘..OF THE NOTE. .. OF COURSE THE BANK WOULD NOT HAVE THE ORIGINAL…IF DEPOSITED…..BUT THEY HAD COPIES FROM THE CLOSING BEFORE DEPOSIT AND ANOTHER COPY WHEN IT WAS DEPOSITED WITH THE STAMP…THIS PROVES THE MORTGAGE WAS PAID….THIS COPY OF THE PAID NOTE IS THE ONE THE BANK DOES NOT WANT YOU TO HAVE….SO THEY GIVE YOU IN THE FORECLOSURE A COPY THAT WAS FROM THE CLOSING….. THEY CAN MAKE AS MANY COPIES AS THEY NEED FOR THEIR FRAUD…NOTHING STOPING THEM…..JUST AS LONG AS THEY DON’T MAKE COPIES OF THE STAMPED NOTE. ..THAT IS WHY ONE SHOULD KEEP DOING ‘ REQUEST TO PRODUCE ‘…..SOMEONE JUST MAY SEND THE RIGHT COPY THAT IS NEEDED IN COURT………( ALONG WITH THE REST OF THE FRAUD ) WAMU WAS NO SAINT…………..

I am not drinking that Kool-aid…All of Europe had to give up their Constitutions in order to enter the Euro….England might be screwed but that is their problem…that has nothing to do with our Constitution..at all..

PROSECUTE THE FRAUD……WHEN WE RECEIVED THE COLLATERAL DEED…THE LOAN WAS RELEASED PAID…AND THAT IS WHAT PEOPLE NEED TO KNOW….OUR HOMES ARE PAID FOR FREE AND CLEAR…

SOMEONE MIGHT SCREW UP AND SEND THE ENDORSED COPY? WHY WOULD THEY HAVE AN EDORSED COPY? THE PURPOSE OF THE COPIES OF THE NOTES WERE SO THEY COULD KEEP SELLING INTERESTS IN THAT ALREADY CASHED NOTE ….THEY COULD NOT HAVE THE ORIGINAL NOTES IF WE HAVE THE COLLATERAL DEED…..THEY CASHED THE CHECK….THE NOTE….WHEN WE GOT THAT DEED…….THAT IS WHY THERE ARE ALLONGES…..TO COVER UP FOR THE FACT THEY CASHED THE NOTE BUT KEPT SELLING INTERESTS IN IT MULTIPLE TIMES..FRAUD, FRAUD AND MORE FRAUD….

The U.S. TREASURY was a big player in this entire mortage “securitization” fiasco…The U.S. TAXPAYER BACKED ALL OF THE LOANS….The U.S. TREASURY WOULD BE THE ENTITY WHO SHOULD HAVE DESTROYED THE NOTES…THE ORIGINATOR DID NOT TAKE THE NOTE TO THE FEDERAL RESERVE TO CASH……IT IS THE U.S. TREASURY WHO ORIGINATED THE LOAN BY ISSUING CREDIT BACKED BY THE U.S. TAXPAYER………..AND CASHED THE NOTE….THE ACTUAL MONEY CAME FROM THE FED BUT THE ACTUAL TRANSACTION COULD NOT HAVE OCCURED WITHOUT THE U.S. TREASURY ISSUING THE CREDIT…..BASED ON OUR SIGNATURES………….THAT SIGNATURE ON THAT NOTE IS WHAT GENERATED THE COLLATERAL DEED THAT WAS SENT TO ALL OF US, AS WELL AS THE BONDS AND THE TREASURIES…..JOSH ROSNER WHO WROTE THE BOOK “RECKLESS ENDANGERMENT” SAID ON BLOOMBERG NEWS THAT FANNIE MAE ALSO BOUGHT BACK LOANS FOR 2-3cents ON THE DOLLAR….FANNIE GOT RICH PAYING THEMSELVES ON RETURNS ON EQUITY…AND THERE IS A HUGE ACCOUNTING SCANDAL AT FANNIE MAE.. THE LOANS WERE BACKED BY THE U..S TAXPAYER….AND FANNIE MAE KNEW EXACTLY WHAT THEY WERE INVESTING IN WAS ALOT OF FRAUD BUT, THEY HAD NO REAL SKIN IN THE GAME…………Everything was done in reverse….the homes were collateralized and paid for first backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. TAXPAYER…..BANKS DON’T PRINT MONEY OR LEND MONEY….AND EITHER DOES THE U.S. TREASURY..THE FED DOES…BUT THE FED CANNOT PRINT MONEY AND THE BANKS CANNOT “LEND” CREDIT WITHOUT THE ISSUANCE OF CREDIT BACKED BY THE U.S. TAXPAYER AND THAT CREDIT CAN ONLY BE ISSUED BY THE U.S. TREASURY….THE ONLY THING THAT BACKS OUR CURRENCY…..THE U.S. TAXPAYER…AND THAT IS ALL THANKS TO THE TRAITOR POLITICIANS….IF WE WERE NEVER TAKEN OFF OF THE GOLD STANDARD THERE COULD HAVE NEVER BEEN ALL OF THIS “LENDING”..

THE U.S. TREASURY DID CASH THE NOTE…IN THE FORM OF THE ISSUANCE OF CREDIT…..

I DID NOT SAY THE MORTAGAGES WERE PAID BY THE U.S. TREASURY…I SAID THE U.S. TREASURY ISSUES THE CREDIT BACKED BY THE U.S. TAXPAYER…..

GEITHNER STATED THAT THE U.S. TREASURY WILL NOT ISSUE CREDIT WITHOUT COLLATERAL TO BACK THAT UP……THAT WAS OUR SIGNATURES…..WHAT WENT ON AFTER THAT WITH THE BONDS, THE TREASURIES AND THE NOTES WAS EXPONENTIAL COLLATERAL FRAUD….

Let me rephrase that then….THE U.S. TREASURY ISSUES CREDIT BACKED BY THE U.S. TAXPAYER’S SIGNATURE WHICH IS IN THE FORM OF BONDS AND
TREASURIES….
…..THE FEDERAL RESERVE CASHES THE CHECK BUT NOT UNTIL THE U.S. TREASURY ISSUES CREDIT BACKED BY THE U.S. TAXPAYER IN THE FORM OF OUR SIGNATURE….

THE PRETENDER LENDER CANNOT GET ISSUED CREDIT WITHOUT COLLATERAL TO BACK UP THAT NOTE…WHICH IS OUR SIGNATURE….THE COLLATERAL GETS ISSUED TO THE HOMEOWNER IN THE FORM OF THE DEED…
…THE FUNDS GET DISPERSED FROM THE FEDERAL RESERVE BANK.. THOSE FUNDS ARE ONLY DISPERSED ON THE ISSUANCE OF CREDIT BY THE US. TREASURY DEPT. AND OUR SIGNATURE IS WHAT CREATES THE ISSUE OF CREDIT BY THE U.S. TREASURY…
THE FEDERAL RESERVE DOES NOT ISSUE CREDIT….
….OUR SIGNATURE GENERATES THE DISPERSMENT OF FUNDS BY THE ISSUANCE OF CREDIT…BY THE U.S. TREASURY….