That what we are fighting to stop….there is real evil behind all of this and 9/11… the truth is in plain sight now about who they are and all of their evil throughout history…they ruled by secrecy for decades…not any more…They have no place in a free and open society…JFK tried to warn us..

Keep in mind from the unindorsed note to the assignment that was produced years after the closing to the allonge transfers nothing.. MERS as assignee means nothing ……MERS is not a Bank..they cant own a loan…

@ Ivent – Thanks. We all know it is fraud and theft of our homes and our economy. I just pray that it doesn’t all end up swept under the rug.

Katheryn..they are screwed because of the Origination fraud…they had 90 days to deliver the loan file to the trust…..if the note is unindorsed it is bearer paper….they have to prove b and c…..the transfer….In Illinois they have 30 days from closing to record the transfer…it doesn’t matter how many times they pass the loan around…none of that fixes the Origination fraud…that is why they are robo-signing docs….trying to re-create a chain of title…..that is fraud…..there is no legal fix for the Origination fraud….It is confusing and they meant it to be that way…but, what is going on in foreclosures court is they are using what we don’t know against us…the fact that they do not have to prove standing to bring a foreclosures suit is incredibly deceptive..evil in fact…these are peoples homes for the love of God!…..

That’s where I’m confused. The original loan was satisfied and that did list MERS as the beneficiary. But that loan was finished with the refinance. Then 2010 a new loan BoA. It has been BoA and BAC where the note has gone back and forth..so it would be bank to bank – right? Of course I have requested all of this through discovery but they won’t answer. I understand what you’re saying about B to C and it started at origination the note from the mortgage was bifurcated which I also put in my complaint but I think that the assignment in May was right when we filed a chp.7 and they were trying to collect but all they were then was a debt collector. I don’t know. Thanks Ivent. It is still kind of muddled in my mind but I better get my Sh__ __ together before I go before “Thy Honor”.

Regardless of how many assignments and allonges they manufacture they still stand in the shoes of the original lender and have to prove the b and c transfers..

They bounce the loans back and forth to try and create the illusion of chain of title….they don’t have it…it is all a sham and a fraud…the fraud started at the Origination….that is where they broke the chain…that is what they are trying to hide….the origination fraud..

The original lender is trying to mask the fact they never sold your loan….just interests in the money flow ……the mortgage payment…that is the ORIGINATION FRAUD…and how they were able to hide the fact they oversold all of the mortgage payments…by 700 trillion dollars…that is why they don’t have the originals……the note is unindorsed because they never sold the loans…

Katherine….MERS is not a bank….a legal assignment to a trust can only go bank to bank…they have to sell the entire loan…those assignments are deceptive…buying a loan ……..a mortgage and a note ….requires delivery and confirmation..