<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: FL Homeowners Hit a Bump in Suit Over &#8216;Reprehensible&#8217; Fraudclosure Court Filing Fees but Case Can Go Forward	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://4closurefraud.org/2011/12/12/fl-homeowners-hit-a-bump-in-suit-over-reprehensible-fraudclosure-court-filing-fees-but-case-can-go-forward/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2011/12/12/fl-homeowners-hit-a-bump-in-suit-over-reprehensible-fraudclosure-court-filing-fees-but-case-can-go-forward/</link>
	<description>- Fighting Foreclosure Fraud BY SHARING THE KNOWLEDGE</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 17:25:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Bobbi Swann		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2011/12/12/fl-homeowners-hit-a-bump-in-suit-over-reprehensible-fraudclosure-court-filing-fees-but-case-can-go-forward/#comment-251182</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bobbi Swann]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 17:25:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=38036#comment-251182</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://4closurefraud.org/2011/12/12/fl-homeowners-hit-a-bump-in-suit-over-reprehensible-fraudclosure-court-filing-fees-but-case-can-go-forward/#comment-249627&quot;&gt;Tee&lt;/a&gt;.

You got that right!!!!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://4closurefraud.org/2011/12/12/fl-homeowners-hit-a-bump-in-suit-over-reprehensible-fraudclosure-court-filing-fees-but-case-can-go-forward/#comment-249627">Tee</a>.</p>
<p>You got that right!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: JamesM		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2011/12/12/fl-homeowners-hit-a-bump-in-suit-over-reprehensible-fraudclosure-court-filing-fees-but-case-can-go-forward/#comment-250396</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JamesM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 06:55:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=38036#comment-250396</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It would seem compulsory counterclaims are a necessary part of the answer, the rule requiring them to be filed with the answer or waved. 
Since the Defendant did not choose to litigate, nor set the date of litigation, and is required to file a timely answer, the fees may force the defendant or file an incomplete response, (the cost means defendant may have to wave the compulsory counterclaims). Therefore limiting the defendants ability to assert all the defenses possible and denying fair access.  The counterclaims being an offset to the orignal claim.

I think it would be good to ask, are the fees for foreclosure counterclaims:

(a) diffrent from other counterclaims in other actions ?  
(b) diffrent from the fee if the same had been filed as an orignal complaint ? 
(c) forcing defendants to chose between asserting the compulsory counterclaims, as is their legal right, or pay for competent counsel ?   Most people in foreclosure have difficulty with the latter and have to waive the former, even though by doing so they lose their right to assert any compulsorily counterclaims.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would seem compulsory counterclaims are a necessary part of the answer, the rule requiring them to be filed with the answer or waved.<br />
Since the Defendant did not choose to litigate, nor set the date of litigation, and is required to file a timely answer, the fees may force the defendant or file an incomplete response, (the cost means defendant may have to wave the compulsory counterclaims). Therefore limiting the defendants ability to assert all the defenses possible and denying fair access.  The counterclaims being an offset to the orignal claim.</p>
<p>I think it would be good to ask, are the fees for foreclosure counterclaims:</p>
<p>(a) diffrent from other counterclaims in other actions ?<br />
(b) diffrent from the fee if the same had been filed as an orignal complaint ?<br />
(c) forcing defendants to chose between asserting the compulsory counterclaims, as is their legal right, or pay for competent counsel ?   Most people in foreclosure have difficulty with the latter and have to waive the former, even though by doing so they lose their right to assert any compulsorily counterclaims.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Paul McLaughlin		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2011/12/12/fl-homeowners-hit-a-bump-in-suit-over-reprehensible-fraudclosure-court-filing-fees-but-case-can-go-forward/#comment-249658</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul McLaughlin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 20:37:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=38036#comment-249658</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Reprehensible fees are another way to disminish the likelihood of the slave class gaining any leverage against powerful crooks.   &#039;One set of laws for the Bankster ilk, another for the rest of us&#039;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reprehensible fees are another way to disminish the likelihood of the slave class gaining any leverage against powerful crooks.   &#8216;One set of laws for the Bankster ilk, another for the rest of us&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: John		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2011/12/12/fl-homeowners-hit-a-bump-in-suit-over-reprehensible-fraudclosure-court-filing-fees-but-case-can-go-forward/#comment-249645</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 20:24:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=38036#comment-249645</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Be nice if the mortgage co or bank had to put up the amount of the suit and if it lost in court to a jury or judge the amount on deposit or escrow would be paid immediately to the homeowner.

 Holding a party responsible for losses obtained by going to court should cut both ways and not be borne by only the homeowner!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Be nice if the mortgage co or bank had to put up the amount of the suit and if it lost in court to a jury or judge the amount on deposit or escrow would be paid immediately to the homeowner.</p>
<p> Holding a party responsible for losses obtained by going to court should cut both ways and not be borne by only the homeowner!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Tee		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2011/12/12/fl-homeowners-hit-a-bump-in-suit-over-reprehensible-fraudclosure-court-filing-fees-but-case-can-go-forward/#comment-249627</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tee]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 20:03:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=38036#comment-249627</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Seems like Florida is mobster Head Quarters eh?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems like Florida is mobster Head Quarters eh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
