Comments on: I-Team: Nevada Supreme Court Case Could Impact Homeowners

By: lvent

lvent — Sat, 31 Dec 2011 07:49:11 +0000

In reply to talktotennessee. I viewed this video on the Kindle..they can't block that..

By: lvent

lvent — Sat, 31 Dec 2011 07:47:22 +0000

In reply to talktotennessee. I read a good bumper sticker tonite...STOP AND SMELL THE TYRANNY!

By: lvent

lvent — Sat, 31 Dec 2011 07:45:44 +0000

In reply to talktotennessee.

All you tube videos have been muted on my computer..I will post this video anyway:

By: lvent

lvent — Sat, 31 Dec 2011 07:37:29 +0000

In reply to talktotennessee. I saw an interesting you tube video where a woman discusses when you have a MERS mortgage you always win in a quiet title suit...because MERS does not own the mortgage or note..!

By: John McCormick

John McCormick — Sat, 31 Dec 2011 07:08:12 +0000

In reply to Tee.

Fact: That MERS was instrumental in changing state law in some locations to effect their scheme. A look at the deposition of Mr. Arnold will confirm at least one such instance. Our Nevada law, as I read it, states that a property interest “may” be recorded with the county recorder. It should shine all sorts of light on the situation if anyone has time to research which assemblymen voted that one in!
See Circuit Court Montgomery Alabama CV-08-900.805.00 Debera Henderson v Merscorp
Deposition of AK Arnold
September 25, 2009

MERS is a member corporation. It is not for profit. The US has an extensive history of corporations formulating both state and national law. In fact it was a corporation, the PENN RR that was instrumental in having restrictions on corporate ownership removed through the work of Tom Scott. The US has a long history of its congress selling out to corporate interests. While we watch the score at the football game and argue about Democrat v Republican, our heritage is stolen from us by corporate interests including the world banking interests.
What is the answer?

By: Tee

Tee — Thu, 29 Dec 2011 02:18:07 +0000

How did MERS ever get approval in being able to record without the use of County Registrar? Did they just take it upon themselves to interupt the traditional means of recording? Who let them get away with this? Must be one of those I have so much money we can do what we want issues eh?

By: talktotennessee

talktotennessee — Wed, 28 Dec 2011 23:12:12 +0000

In reply to talktotennessee. Money reaches all levels, however. Everyone will be watching this case.

By: talktotennessee

talktotennessee — Wed, 28 Dec 2011 23:11:20 +0000

It will depend on whether the judiciary is conservative to the law or activists. In this case, conservative to the law would see MERS without legal standing, I would think.