<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: In re: DANIEL JOSEPH SUTTER &#124; Bankers are tagged by court with &#8220;unclean hands&#8221; and mortgage is adjudicated &#8220;void ab initio&#8221;	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://4closurefraud.org/2012/01/04/in-re-daniel-joseph-sutter-bankers-are-tagged-by-court-with-unclean-hands-and-mortgage-is-adjudicated-void-ab-initio/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2012/01/04/in-re-daniel-joseph-sutter-bankers-are-tagged-by-court-with-unclean-hands-and-mortgage-is-adjudicated-void-ab-initio/</link>
	<description>- Fighting Foreclosure Fraud BY SHARING THE KNOWLEDGE</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2015 20:11:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Sheryl L. Sutter		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2012/01/04/in-re-daniel-joseph-sutter-bankers-are-tagged-by-court-with-unclean-hands-and-mortgage-is-adjudicated-void-ab-initio/#comment-579409</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheryl L. Sutter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2015 20:11:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=39536#comment-579409</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Here&#039;s email it is three years later.  We have secured new legal representation and have since discovered fraud with the rest of the documentation as well...in fact...&quot;their&quot; note happens to be a copy of our duplicate note with endorsements...and the note that they tried to pass off as the &quot;blue ink&quot; note has failed miserably seeing we signed in black ink, as demonstrated by the rest of our duplicate packet...which, by the way, are the same documents the bank has tried to make thier own...only problem...we hold the original duplicates....Eleven years and they have never had standing...ever....shame on them...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s email it is three years later.  We have secured new legal representation and have since discovered fraud with the rest of the documentation as well&#8230;in fact&#8230;&#8221;their&#8221; note happens to be a copy of our duplicate note with endorsements&#8230;and the note that they tried to pass off as the &#8220;blue ink&#8221; note has failed miserably seeing we signed in black ink, as demonstrated by the rest of our duplicate packet&#8230;which, by the way, are the same documents the bank has tried to make thier own&#8230;only problem&#8230;we hold the original duplicates&#8230;.Eleven years and they have never had standing&#8230;ever&#8230;.shame on them&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Sheryl Sutter		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2012/01/04/in-re-daniel-joseph-sutter-bankers-are-tagged-by-court-with-unclean-hands-and-mortgage-is-adjudicated-void-ab-initio/#comment-280160</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheryl Sutter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 00:45:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=39536#comment-280160</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[As the plaintiffs in this case I can honestly say it&#039;s been a long road.  It took us six years to get to this point...with the bank treating us like we were the criminals the whole way.  We accept the fact that due to the economy and our own financial situation, we most likely would have lost our home.  It is not our fault that the banks took it upon themselves to sign our names to the mortgage document.  It was in our right for public trust that this should have never occurred.  I am glad that the courts (and I don&#039;t mean the bankruptcy court, which in my opinion, are pro-creditor even when the creditor is the criminal) saw through their smoke screen and did what was correct in this case,]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As the plaintiffs in this case I can honestly say it&#8217;s been a long road.  It took us six years to get to this point&#8230;with the bank treating us like we were the criminals the whole way.  We accept the fact that due to the economy and our own financial situation, we most likely would have lost our home.  It is not our fault that the banks took it upon themselves to sign our names to the mortgage document.  It was in our right for public trust that this should have never occurred.  I am glad that the courts (and I don&#8217;t mean the bankruptcy court, which in my opinion, are pro-creditor even when the creditor is the criminal) saw through their smoke screen and did what was correct in this case,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: readdocs		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2012/01/04/in-re-daniel-joseph-sutter-bankers-are-tagged-by-court-with-unclean-hands-and-mortgage-is-adjudicated-void-ab-initio/#comment-278659</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[readdocs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 20:07:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=39536#comment-278659</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[http://livinglies.wordpress.com/2012/01/04/why-do-we-call-them-banks/

Why do we call them banks?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://livinglies.wordpress.com/2012/01/04/why-do-we-call-them-banks/" rel="nofollow ugc">http://livinglies.wordpress.com/2012/01/04/why-do-we-call-them-banks/</a></p>
<p>Why do we call them banks?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: lvent		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2012/01/04/in-re-daniel-joseph-sutter-bankers-are-tagged-by-court-with-unclean-hands-and-mortgage-is-adjudicated-void-ab-initio/#comment-278600</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lvent]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 19:13:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=39536#comment-278600</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[FOX Business reporting.... MF GLOBAL SOLD MILLIONS OF DOLLARS OF SECURITIES TO GOLDMAN SACHS...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FOX Business reporting&#8230;. MF GLOBAL SOLD MILLIONS OF DOLLARS OF SECURITIES TO GOLDMAN SACHS&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: lvent		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2012/01/04/in-re-daniel-joseph-sutter-bankers-are-tagged-by-court-with-unclean-hands-and-mortgage-is-adjudicated-void-ab-initio/#comment-278592</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lvent]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 19:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=39536#comment-278592</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://4closurefraud.org/2012/01/04/in-re-daniel-joseph-sutter-bankers-are-tagged-by-court-with-unclean-hands-and-mortgage-is-adjudicated-void-ab-initio/#comment-278587&quot;&gt;lvent&lt;/a&gt;.

FOX Business reporting that Bernanke blaming the housing market again for the slow economic recovery...Maybe it is time the Fed stopped bankrupting the people by feeding the Banks and maybe it is about time that the Federal Regulators audited the BANKS and then shut them down because they are insolvent.....!  Problem solved!!!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://4closurefraud.org/2012/01/04/in-re-daniel-joseph-sutter-bankers-are-tagged-by-court-with-unclean-hands-and-mortgage-is-adjudicated-void-ab-initio/#comment-278587">lvent</a>.</p>
<p>FOX Business reporting that Bernanke blaming the housing market again for the slow economic recovery&#8230;Maybe it is time the Fed stopped bankrupting the people by feeding the Banks and maybe it is about time that the Federal Regulators audited the BANKS and then shut them down because they are insolvent&#8230;..!  Problem solved!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: lvent		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2012/01/04/in-re-daniel-joseph-sutter-bankers-are-tagged-by-court-with-unclean-hands-and-mortgage-is-adjudicated-void-ab-initio/#comment-278587</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lvent]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 18:58:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=39536#comment-278587</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Everyone should Google and read Adam Levitin&#039;s Congressional Written Report Regarding Securitization And Foreclosure Of November 18, 2010.  In it he explains the crimes of the banks to Congress in simple terms that most could understand. Mr. Levitin also explains that most homeowners do not have attorneys to rep them in court and that is not the homeowner in most cases who are deadbeats but the servicers who are at fault.. Mr. Levitin stated that there could very well be a large systemic risk to the largest banks something along the lines of 2008 and  that the review on compliance by the banks and fraud in the foreclosures needs to be conducted by Federal Regulators. Mr. Levitin stated is not within the ability of the Federal Reserve or the Banking Regulators to review this risk...
Mr. Levin also used CEO of JP MORGAN CHASE, JAMIE DIMON&#039;S remark that &quot;for the most part, by the time you get to the end of the process wer&#039;re not evicting people who deserve to stay in their house.&quot; and that Mr. Dimon&#039;s logic condones vigilante foreclosures: so long as the debtor is delinquent, it does not matter who evicts them or how.  (And it doesn&#039;t matter if there are some innocents who lose their homes in wrongful foreclosure as long as &quot;for the most part&quot; the borrowers are in default.) But Mr Levitin argues, BUT THAT IS NOT HOW THE LEGAL SYSTEM WORKS...ANY OLD STRANGER CANNOT TAKE THE LAW INTO HIS OWN HANDS AND KICK SOMEONE OUT OF THEIR HOME..THAT RIGHT IS RESERVED SOLELY FOR THE MORTGAGEE...Mr. Levitin said that ultimately, the &quot;No Harm, No Foul.&quot; argument is a claim that rule of law should yield to bank&#039;s convenience  and to argue that problems in the foreclosure process are irrelevant because the homeowner owes someone a debt is to declare that the banks are above the law....
Thank you Mr. Levitin...and Jamie Dimon...shouldn&#039;t you be in prison by now?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everyone should Google and read Adam Levitin&#8217;s Congressional Written Report Regarding Securitization And Foreclosure Of November 18, 2010.  In it he explains the crimes of the banks to Congress in simple terms that most could understand. Mr. Levitin also explains that most homeowners do not have attorneys to rep them in court and that is not the homeowner in most cases who are deadbeats but the servicers who are at fault.. Mr. Levitin stated that there could very well be a large systemic risk to the largest banks something along the lines of 2008 and  that the review on compliance by the banks and fraud in the foreclosures needs to be conducted by Federal Regulators. Mr. Levitin stated is not within the ability of the Federal Reserve or the Banking Regulators to review this risk&#8230;<br />
Mr. Levin also used CEO of JP MORGAN CHASE, JAMIE DIMON&#8217;S remark that &#8220;for the most part, by the time you get to the end of the process wer&#8217;re not evicting people who deserve to stay in their house.&#8221; and that Mr. Dimon&#8217;s logic condones vigilante foreclosures: so long as the debtor is delinquent, it does not matter who evicts them or how.  (And it doesn&#8217;t matter if there are some innocents who lose their homes in wrongful foreclosure as long as &#8220;for the most part&#8221; the borrowers are in default.) But Mr Levitin argues, BUT THAT IS NOT HOW THE LEGAL SYSTEM WORKS&#8230;ANY OLD STRANGER CANNOT TAKE THE LAW INTO HIS OWN HANDS AND KICK SOMEONE OUT OF THEIR HOME..THAT RIGHT IS RESERVED SOLELY FOR THE MORTGAGEE&#8230;Mr. Levitin said that ultimately, the &#8220;No Harm, No Foul.&#8221; argument is a claim that rule of law should yield to bank&#8217;s convenience  and to argue that problems in the foreclosure process are irrelevant because the homeowner owes someone a debt is to declare that the banks are above the law&#8230;.<br />
Thank you Mr. Levitin&#8230;and Jamie Dimon&#8230;shouldn&#8217;t you be in prison by now?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Pamela Edwards		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2012/01/04/in-re-daniel-joseph-sutter-bankers-are-tagged-by-court-with-unclean-hands-and-mortgage-is-adjudicated-void-ab-initio/#comment-278473</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pamela Edwards]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 16:02:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=39536#comment-278473</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Unclean hands well thats fairly mild compared to what I would say.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unclean hands well thats fairly mild compared to what I would say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Beth A.		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2012/01/04/in-re-daniel-joseph-sutter-bankers-are-tagged-by-court-with-unclean-hands-and-mortgage-is-adjudicated-void-ab-initio/#comment-278472</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Beth A.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 16:02:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=39536#comment-278472</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Yeah - judges who get it are our only chance.

Thank you so much for posting this as portions of this are relevant in our situation!!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah &#8211; judges who get it are our only chance.</p>
<p>Thank you so much for posting this as portions of this are relevant in our situation!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
