<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: BAM! &#124;  PATTERSON v. GMAC MORTGAGE, LLC JUDGMENT VACATED No Assignment = GMAC Mortgage did not own any interest in the house	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://4closurefraud.org/2012/01/24/bam-patterson-v-gmac-mortgage-llc-judgment-vacated-no-assignment-gmac-mortgage-did-not-own-any-interest-in-the-house/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2012/01/24/bam-patterson-v-gmac-mortgage-llc-judgment-vacated-no-assignment-gmac-mortgage-did-not-own-any-interest-in-the-house/</link>
	<description>- Fighting Foreclosure Fraud BY SHARING THE KNOWLEDGE</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 20:27:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: lvent		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2012/01/24/bam-patterson-v-gmac-mortgage-llc-judgment-vacated-no-assignment-gmac-mortgage-did-not-own-any-interest-in-the-house/#comment-303290</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lvent]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 20:27:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=40904#comment-303290</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://4closurefraud.org/2012/01/24/bam-patterson-v-gmac-mortgage-llc-judgment-vacated-no-assignment-gmac-mortgage-did-not-own-any-interest-in-the-house/#comment-303273&quot;&gt;Katheryn&lt;/a&gt;.

If the pretender lender has the Original unindorsed note..with no legal assignment..that is proof of fraud..there is no legal fix for the ORIGINATION FRAUD..!  They never delivered the loans to the trust..or sold the loans...just interests in the notes...that is what they are trying to hide..]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://4closurefraud.org/2012/01/24/bam-patterson-v-gmac-mortgage-llc-judgment-vacated-no-assignment-gmac-mortgage-did-not-own-any-interest-in-the-house/#comment-303273">Katheryn</a>.</p>
<p>If the pretender lender has the Original unindorsed note..with no legal assignment..that is proof of fraud..there is no legal fix for the ORIGINATION FRAUD..!  They never delivered the loans to the trust..or sold the loans&#8230;just interests in the notes&#8230;that is what they are trying to hide..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: lvent		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2012/01/24/bam-patterson-v-gmac-mortgage-llc-judgment-vacated-no-assignment-gmac-mortgage-did-not-own-any-interest-in-the-house/#comment-303280</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lvent]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 20:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=40904#comment-303280</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://4closurefraud.org/2012/01/24/bam-patterson-v-gmac-mortgage-llc-judgment-vacated-no-assignment-gmac-mortgage-did-not-own-any-interest-in-the-house/#comment-303273&quot;&gt;Katheryn&lt;/a&gt;.

They cant comply with those requests for discovery or they would have to reveal the fact they committed massive mortgage fraud with our signatures...they never sold the loans..they oversold interests in the notes..that is what they are trying to cover up and why they are robo-signing docs..! They are criminals!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://4closurefraud.org/2012/01/24/bam-patterson-v-gmac-mortgage-llc-judgment-vacated-no-assignment-gmac-mortgage-did-not-own-any-interest-in-the-house/#comment-303273">Katheryn</a>.</p>
<p>They cant comply with those requests for discovery or they would have to reveal the fact they committed massive mortgage fraud with our signatures&#8230;they never sold the loans..they oversold interests in the notes..that is what they are trying to cover up and why they are robo-signing docs..! They are criminals!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: lvent		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2012/01/24/bam-patterson-v-gmac-mortgage-llc-judgment-vacated-no-assignment-gmac-mortgage-did-not-own-any-interest-in-the-house/#comment-303277</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lvent]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 20:07:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=40904#comment-303277</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://4closurefraud.org/2012/01/24/bam-patterson-v-gmac-mortgage-llc-judgment-vacated-no-assignment-gmac-mortgage-did-not-own-any-interest-in-the-house/#comment-303233&quot;&gt;readdocs&lt;/a&gt;.

There is no discovery....they never sold the loans to a trust....they held the originals and only sold an interest in the notes...hundreds of times...that is why they are insolvent!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://4closurefraud.org/2012/01/24/bam-patterson-v-gmac-mortgage-llc-judgment-vacated-no-assignment-gmac-mortgage-did-not-own-any-interest-in-the-house/#comment-303233">readdocs</a>.</p>
<p>There is no discovery&#8230;.they never sold the loans to a trust&#8230;.they held the originals and only sold an interest in the notes&#8230;hundreds of times&#8230;that is why they are insolvent!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Katheryn		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2012/01/24/bam-patterson-v-gmac-mortgage-llc-judgment-vacated-no-assignment-gmac-mortgage-did-not-own-any-interest-in-the-house/#comment-303273</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Katheryn]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 20:05:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=40904#comment-303273</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://4closurefraud.org/2012/01/24/bam-patterson-v-gmac-mortgage-llc-judgment-vacated-no-assignment-gmac-mortgage-did-not-own-any-interest-in-the-house/#comment-303233&quot;&gt;readdocs&lt;/a&gt;.

readdocs - that&#039;s true if they will comply and turn over any information.  I&#039;ve had to file a motion to compel discovery and then they threatened me with scare tactics.  They brazenly will spit in your face and that of the court.  They follow no rules period. There are no Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.  They have been repaced with the Bank of America Corporation Rules of Uncivil Procedure and by which most judges carefully adhere to.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://4closurefraud.org/2012/01/24/bam-patterson-v-gmac-mortgage-llc-judgment-vacated-no-assignment-gmac-mortgage-did-not-own-any-interest-in-the-house/#comment-303233">readdocs</a>.</p>
<p>readdocs &#8211; that&#8217;s true if they will comply and turn over any information.  I&#8217;ve had to file a motion to compel discovery and then they threatened me with scare tactics.  They brazenly will spit in your face and that of the court.  They follow no rules period. There are no Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.  They have been repaced with the Bank of America Corporation Rules of Uncivil Procedure and by which most judges carefully adhere to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: lvent		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2012/01/24/bam-patterson-v-gmac-mortgage-llc-judgment-vacated-no-assignment-gmac-mortgage-did-not-own-any-interest-in-the-house/#comment-303271</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lvent]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 20:04:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=40904#comment-303271</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://4closurefraud.org/2012/01/24/bam-patterson-v-gmac-mortgage-llc-judgment-vacated-no-assignment-gmac-mortgage-did-not-own-any-interest-in-the-house/#comment-303233&quot;&gt;readdocs&lt;/a&gt;.

Readdocs...the original lender was the U.S. TAXPAYER....the note was a check we gave them to cash...they used that note as a poker chip and were gambling with the house money....the peoples money...they committed $700 trillion dollars in mortgage fraud selling interests in our notes to investors hundreds of times using our electronic signatures ...!  the banks and Wall Street committed exponential collateral mortgage fraud in our names!!  They owe the U.S. TAXPAYERS HUNDREDS OF TRILLIONS OF DOLLARS IN ILL GOTTEN GAINS....The investors invested in the notes...they did not invest in the loans because the bank never sold the loan to the trusts...just interests in the money flow...the mortgage payments..!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://4closurefraud.org/2012/01/24/bam-patterson-v-gmac-mortgage-llc-judgment-vacated-no-assignment-gmac-mortgage-did-not-own-any-interest-in-the-house/#comment-303233">readdocs</a>.</p>
<p>Readdocs&#8230;the original lender was the U.S. TAXPAYER&#8230;.the note was a check we gave them to cash&#8230;they used that note as a poker chip and were gambling with the house money&#8230;.the peoples money&#8230;they committed $700 trillion dollars in mortgage fraud selling interests in our notes to investors hundreds of times using our electronic signatures &#8230;!  the banks and Wall Street committed exponential collateral mortgage fraud in our names!!  They owe the U.S. TAXPAYERS HUNDREDS OF TRILLIONS OF DOLLARS IN ILL GOTTEN GAINS&#8230;.The investors invested in the notes&#8230;they did not invest in the loans because the bank never sold the loan to the trusts&#8230;just interests in the money flow&#8230;the mortgage payments..!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Richard		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2012/01/24/bam-patterson-v-gmac-mortgage-llc-judgment-vacated-no-assignment-gmac-mortgage-did-not-own-any-interest-in-the-house/#comment-303234</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 19:38:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=40904#comment-303234</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://4closurefraud.org/2012/01/24/bam-patterson-v-gmac-mortgage-llc-judgment-vacated-no-assignment-gmac-mortgage-did-not-own-any-interest-in-the-house/#comment-303217&quot;&gt;Michael&lt;/a&gt;.

What happens if the &quot;banksters&quot; get another assignment and sue to foreclose again??? Was the dismissal with prejudice?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://4closurefraud.org/2012/01/24/bam-patterson-v-gmac-mortgage-llc-judgment-vacated-no-assignment-gmac-mortgage-did-not-own-any-interest-in-the-house/#comment-303217">Michael</a>.</p>
<p>What happens if the &#8220;banksters&#8221; get another assignment and sue to foreclose again??? Was the dismissal with prejudice?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: readdocs		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2012/01/24/bam-patterson-v-gmac-mortgage-llc-judgment-vacated-no-assignment-gmac-mortgage-did-not-own-any-interest-in-the-house/#comment-303233</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[readdocs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 19:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=40904#comment-303233</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The borrowers need to make an extreme effort to discover who the REAL lender is.  Discovery
will allow them to know if the lender is still viable, or defunct.  It will allow them to know if they still
owe a debt and to whom.  This is just good common sense in covering their butts.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The borrowers need to make an extreme effort to discover who the REAL lender is.  Discovery<br />
will allow them to know if the lender is still viable, or defunct.  It will allow them to know if they still<br />
owe a debt and to whom.  This is just good common sense in covering their butts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Michael		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2012/01/24/bam-patterson-v-gmac-mortgage-llc-judgment-vacated-no-assignment-gmac-mortgage-did-not-own-any-interest-in-the-house/#comment-303217</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 19:12:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=40904#comment-303217</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Rename that state!

From now on--it&#039;s alaBAMa, to me....

Way to go, AlaBAMa!

I&#039;m impressed......]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rename that state!</p>
<p>From now on&#8211;it&#8217;s alaBAMa, to me&#8230;.</p>
<p>Way to go, AlaBAMa!</p>
<p>I&#8217;m impressed&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
