<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: STATE OF NEVADA vs. LENDER PROCESSING SERVICES &#124; Lender Processing Services, Inc. (LPS) Files Motion to Dismiss Nevada Attorney General Complaint	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://4closurefraud.org/2012/01/31/state-of-nevada-vs-lender-processing-services-lender-processing-services-inc-lps-files-motion-to-dismiss-nevada-attorney-general-complaint/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2012/01/31/state-of-nevada-vs-lender-processing-services-lender-processing-services-inc-lps-files-motion-to-dismiss-nevada-attorney-general-complaint/</link>
	<description>- Fighting Foreclosure Fraud BY SHARING THE KNOWLEDGE</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 15:18:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.7</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Kat Torrenga		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2012/01/31/state-of-nevada-vs-lender-processing-services-lender-processing-services-inc-lps-files-motion-to-dismiss-nevada-attorney-general-complaint/#comment-318032</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kat Torrenga]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 15:18:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=41356#comment-318032</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Thank God for this site! I really need help here in MI.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank God for this site! I really need help here in MI.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: neidermeyer		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2012/01/31/state-of-nevada-vs-lender-processing-services-lender-processing-services-inc-lps-files-motion-to-dismiss-nevada-attorney-general-complaint/#comment-313380</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[neidermeyer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 22:52:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=41356#comment-313380</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[They want specificity? ,, They want more than 3 examples? ,, They want examples of how people were harmed? They have the balls to request a dismissal with prejudice? Forgery is OK in Georgia with the permission of the person whose name is being signed... Well then show us where for every signature approval was given... even in cases where they were using the name of an ex-employee... 

Sounds like LPS wants war.. but lately calls have outpaced put purchases... what do the insiders know?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They want specificity? ,, They want more than 3 examples? ,, They want examples of how people were harmed? They have the balls to request a dismissal with prejudice? Forgery is OK in Georgia with the permission of the person whose name is being signed&#8230; Well then show us where for every signature approval was given&#8230; even in cases where they were using the name of an ex-employee&#8230; </p>
<p>Sounds like LPS wants war.. but lately calls have outpaced put purchases&#8230; what do the insiders know?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: indio007		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2012/01/31/state-of-nevada-vs-lender-processing-services-lender-processing-services-inc-lps-files-motion-to-dismiss-nevada-attorney-general-complaint/#comment-313239</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[indio007]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 20:20:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=41356#comment-313239</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[surrogate signing is expressly permitted? 

Not by a notary.

Not to mention surrogate signing in place of an executive corporate officer has to be predicated on a corporate resolution changing the by-laws . It must be expressly authorized by a vote of the board of directors. We know this didn&#039;t happen.

LPS is so full of shit and desperate . I love reading them squirm.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>surrogate signing is expressly permitted? </p>
<p>Not by a notary.</p>
<p>Not to mention surrogate signing in place of an executive corporate officer has to be predicated on a corporate resolution changing the by-laws . It must be expressly authorized by a vote of the board of directors. We know this didn&#8217;t happen.</p>
<p>LPS is so full of shit and desperate . I love reading them squirm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
