Comments on: Matt Weidner | Florida’s 2012 Foreclosure Reforms are A Pandora’s Box That Must Not Pass (VIDEO) https://4closurefraud.org/2012/02/18/matt-weidner-floridas-2012-foreclosure-reforms-are-a-pandoras-box-that-must-not-pass-video/ - Fighting Foreclosure Fraud BY SHARING THE KNOWLEDGE Sat, 07 Dec 2013 06:01:22 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.8 By: Mr Rocck https://4closurefraud.org/2012/02/18/matt-weidner-floridas-2012-foreclosure-reforms-are-a-pandoras-box-that-must-not-pass-video/#comment-430129 Sat, 07 Dec 2013 06:01:22 +0000 https://4closurefraud.org/?p=42627#comment-430129 A year and a half later and I would like to know the answer to that questions as well.

]]> By: Michelle https://4closurefraud.org/2012/02/18/matt-weidner-floridas-2012-foreclosure-reforms-are-a-pandoras-box-that-must-not-pass-video/#comment-349113 Sun, 04 Mar 2012 14:40:59 +0000 https://4closurefraud.org/?p=42627#comment-349113 How was or is it even possible for us as a borrower to GRANT to MERS as Nominee for bankster. What gives us that right? That is like saying Michelle GRANTS to MARK STOPA as Nominee for Mat Weidner. What if Mat Weidner does not want MARK STOPA to be his nominee?

Can we REVOKE our Grant to MERS? Why not? As MERS would say, there is no law prohibiting it. Again, I ask, can we REVOKE the language “Borrowere, herby GRANTS “”” In essence revoking whatever nominee means.

]]>