Comments on: RICHARD F. DAVET v. PAUL J. MIKHLI, et al | Ohio Courts’ Reluctance to Admit Fraud Causes 16 Years of Foreclosure Litigation

By: To Tell The Truth

To Tell The Truth — Tue, 28 Feb 2012 16:19:38 +0000

In reply to Fury.

Fury, isn’t that new bill that just passed to fast tracked foreclosure of so called abandoned property have in it to protect the new buyer? That was one of the issues we were up against…lets see how much tweaking it gets now that it is passed before it goes into effect…

By: FIGHTING IN OHIO

FIGHTING IN OHIO — Tue, 28 Feb 2012 01:23:01 +0000

I have been fighting an almost identical case for over two years. I am fighting a foreclosure case in Montgomery County Ohio. The bank (PNC Bank) in my case has used robo-signers, a fraudulent Note, and many other tatics. I was fighting pro se but I had to get an attorney. I will fight to the death before I let the ROBBERS/GANGSTER/THIEVES steal my home. The tried to take my home and my money. I paid them over $6000 before I found out they did not own the loan and the note filed was fake. Somehow this is still going thru the court system. I know if it was me filing fake paperwork and committing perjury I would be in jail as we speak. I SAY EDUCATE YOURSELF AND KEEP FIGHTING.

By: Bobbi Swann

Bobbi Swann — Sun, 26 Feb 2012 23:33:28 +0000

In reply to StuckinSoPa. Stuckinsopa: the problem lies in that you have missed the whole LEGAL point or issue. Foreclosure is a LEGAL remedy under the LAW. Telling the person to move on and get on with life is just plain WRONG! Having the party who claimed ownership walk with all of the owner's equity position as a remedy under law is outrageous! Under your own vision there should be no law at all with the banks always right! This is so problematic in that banks actually believe that THEY can control the courts and obviously have been successful in brainwashing you as well on this subject!

By: Ken Hansen

Ken Hansen — Sat, 25 Feb 2012 23:23:21 +0000

Davet vs Goliath – this really is an amazing post. The arrogance of the 1% is appalling, destructive and arrogant.

By: lvent

lvent — Fri, 24 Feb 2012 23:08:45 +0000

In reply to Fury.

Fury, you are being direct, correct, truthful and honest….and there is also PROOF OF ALL OF OUR CLAIMS…therefore all of this TRUTH AND PROOF THAT IS BEING REVEALED TO WHO EVER SEEKS THE TRUTH.. leaves WE THE PEOPLE, BEING AFFORDED THE KNOWEDGE AND THEREFORE WE THE PEOPLE CAN PROVE THE TRUTH…. and may leave WE THE PEOPLE with NO OTHER ALTERNATIVE.. because of all of their massive moral and criminal corruption ….which is all, unconstitutional and illegal…, and all born of ….secrets, lies and deceit in order for these criminals to commit massive FRAUD AND ROBBERY IN THE NAMES OF AMERICAN PEOPLE..INDEED THE ONLY ALTERNATIVE FOR WE THE PEOPLE MAY BE….. TO OCCUPY EVERYTHING…..WITH OUR RECORDED, STAMPED PAID DEEDS…OUR RECEIPTS..BACKED UP BY OUR CONSTITUTIONAL AND LEGAL RIGHT AS OWNERS AND CITIZENS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA TO IMPLEMENT THE — USE OF……. GUTS, GUNS AND GOD TO PROTECT OUR FREEDOM, OUR PROPERTY AND OUR LIBERTY UNDER THE LAWS THAT WERE CARVED IN STONE AND SWORN INTO LAW… BY WE THE PEOPLE VIA OUR U.S. CONSTITUTION AND OUR U.S. BILL OF RIGHTS….AND VERIFIED AND SWORN INTO LAW BY THE PEOPLES DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE…….!! GOD BLESS AMERICA…!! THEREFORE WE THE PEOPLE DO HAVE THE LEGAL POWER AND WILL EXERT IT IN ORDER TO OVERCOME THIS UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND ILLEGAL TYRANNY THAT IS ROBBING AND DEPRESSING WE THE PEOPLE AND WE THE PEOPLE WILL THEREFORE…. EXERT OUR CONSTITUTIONAL AND LEGAL RIGHTS THAT STATE THAT ALL MEN ARE CREATED EQUAL UNDER THE LAWS OF THIS LAND AS STATED AND SWORN IN TO LAW BY THE LEGAL DOCUMENTS…..AKA ..THE U.S. CONSTITUTION AND THE U.S. BILL OF RIGHTS AS WELL AS THE PROPERTY LAWS AND TRUST LAWS OF THIS GREAT LAND…WHICH WAS ALL FOUGHT FOR, DIED FOR, FOUNDED, FUNDED AND PAID FOR BY WE THE PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA…WHICH IS THE PEOPLES HO– USE…THE LAND OF THE FREE AND THE HOME OF THE BRAVE…..!!!!

By: Fury

Fury — Fri, 24 Feb 2012 22:49:31 +0000

In reply to David.

david.
sorry but you are wrong.
legally, there is no protection for a family who bought a home that was illegally seized.

just like if you bought a stolen piece of jewelry from a pawn shop.
you could sue the pawn shop, but you have no case against the rightful owner of the jewelry
who wants it back.

it is like families using the current day courts to get back jewelry and art stolen by the nazis that was later sold to collectors.

on almost all f/c homes and short sales
the title is broken., these homes that are being sold for next to nothing have been stolen.

check out youtube for real estate brokers warning people against short sales, especially w/ bank of america.

caveat emptor. BUYER BEWARE.

By: Fury

Fury — Fri, 24 Feb 2012 22:41:28 +0000

thank you, richard davet.

you are an inspiration. i know you post on our various boards and you gave us the courage
to fight these banking criminals. you welcomed me but i was too afraid to even respond to you at that time.

we are pro se also. it can be done but it is scary.

i wish f/c defense lawyers would really focus on suing these fraudsters for damages.

you cannot mod a fraud.
you can help homeowners navigate the courts and get back compensation including treble damages.

By: Barbra Orr

Barbra Orr — Fri, 24 Feb 2012 21:05:41 +0000

These judges did not pass the sissy test. is it ever going to end????? I would love to see BOA, , freddie, fannie,citi, wells fargo closed down by by the long arm of the law.

By: David

David — Fri, 24 Feb 2012 20:54:10 +0000

One of the main issues in Davit’s case is that he is suing the wrong entity. He has the notion that he will uproot a third party family from a home they bought as innocent by standers. A judge would never do that because housing costs would plummet if any home bought on what appears to be clear title may be lost to a previous owner. Davet should be suing the bank to get financial retribution and not after the physical property to seek judgement against an innocent 3rd party.

By: papergate

papergate — Fri, 24 Feb 2012 19:49:59 +0000

Were you ever in a rush, on a busy day, perhaps going to an appointment – you find a parking spot, park your car – get out and put hours worth of coins into a meter – you come out hours later to see your car being towed – with a ticket on it from a few hours’ earlier – the problem – you paid the wrong parking meter because you didn’t realize s the meter in front of your car – that appeared to be the correct parking meter – wasn’t – this entire scenario has been about paying the wrong parking meters but believing we were doing the right thing only to get ticketed and towed (foreclosed) away – not about paying – the good faith intentions were always about paying it was just the correct meters to deposit the payments were never clear and coins had already been lost in a meter that never mattered and merely benefited the guy who parked in front of your car after the fact and didn’t pay the meter because he was able to enjoy your couple of hours – the same applies to this mortgage mess – we are in rushes because society forces us to move at ridiculous paces keeping up with all the malarky going on – and now find ourselves trying to figure out who or what we are or were supposed to deal with – it should be apparent by now that we have been reluctant (since birth we’re taught to be so) to not pay money to a stranger – it will never amount or benefit anyone but the stranger running off with the money – with no considerations or exchanges – that’s the problem – paying into an unknown source to benefit an unknown entity that may not exist or even be able to re-convey our properties back to us – and in most cases – we simply have been fighting for the right to be paying – fairly and equitably to the right party – that’s all – it doesn’t make sense that judiciary are not taking the position of first and foremost determining exactly who the parties are – why they have crossed the judicial threshold – and what exactly is their entitlements – it is already known that the borrower is the owner – but who the other characters are in the mess need to be addressed and accounted for by the judiciary if they are not going to be responsible enough to be trusted. In this entire mess, what is the least apparent regard is why are the homeowner’s rarely ever given the benefit of perhaps they have a point – after all they have the most to lose and the least to defend – they possess 50% of the argument but yet their sides of the argument are regarded as having no more than 1% in value – this is wrong – a man’s (person’s) home is their shelter – why wouldn’t they do everything to protect it – we run across the oceans to protect those belonging to total strangers and their homes costing us billions but yet we cannot see or aid our own – karma must be piling up on the paybacks and it isn’t going to be the financial sector benefiting when she does come to collect. Their windfalls will be the very thing that will take their breaths away in the end – like a back draft in a fire – karma will most definitely suck out the air and incinerate those who wrongly benefited – it is inevitable as we’ve learned from history. The question is which side of the door will you (President, administration) be standing??