Comments on: Ruiz v. 1st Fidelity Loan Servicing, LLC | Minnesota Appeals Court: Foreclosure By Advertisement Is Void Unless Strict Statutory Compliance Is Met https://4closurefraud.org/2012/03/14/ruiz-v-1st-fidelity-loan-servicing-llc-minnesota-appeals-court-foreclosure-by-advertisement-is-void-unless-strict-statutory-compliance-is-met/ - Fighting Foreclosure Fraud BY SHARING THE KNOWLEDGE Wed, 07 Nov 2012 21:33:44 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.2 By: Jonathan Drewes https://4closurefraud.org/2012/03/14/ruiz-v-1st-fidelity-loan-servicing-llc-minnesota-appeals-court-foreclosure-by-advertisement-is-void-unless-strict-statutory-compliance-is-met/#comment-404776 Wed, 07 Nov 2012 21:33:44 +0000 https://4closurefraud.org/?p=44371#comment-404776 Oral argument today on this case in front of the Minnesota Supreme Court! Video of the argument likely available either tonight or tomorrow on the court’s website: http://www.tpt.org/courts/

]]> By: To Tell The Truth https://4closurefraud.org/2012/03/14/ruiz-v-1st-fidelity-loan-servicing-llc-minnesota-appeals-court-foreclosure-by-advertisement-is-void-unless-strict-statutory-compliance-is-met/#comment-360151 Wed, 14 Mar 2012 17:53:27 +0000 https://4closurefraud.org/?p=44371#comment-360151 In reply to Joe Gaffney.

Florida is still a judicial state…that has not changed…

]]> By: Joe Gaffney https://4closurefraud.org/2012/03/14/ruiz-v-1st-fidelity-loan-servicing-llc-minnesota-appeals-court-foreclosure-by-advertisement-is-void-unless-strict-statutory-compliance-is-met/#comment-360134 Wed, 14 Mar 2012 16:53:47 +0000 https://4closurefraud.org/?p=44371#comment-360134 I wonder how many other States have substantially similar State supreme court rulings? Florida, for example, is a non-judicial State but its summary foreclosure process is similar to Minnisota’s foreclosure by advertisement process, in many respects, in my opinion, but, I could be wrong. However, iof I am right, I’ll bet that the State also has something substantially similar to Minnisota’s “strict compliance” rules.

It’s worth checking up on, I think.

]]>