Comments on: Chris Whalen (Bank Shill) on Lien State vs Title State (VIDEO)

By: Carlos Dehesa

Carlos Dehesa — Fri, 06 Apr 2012 22:20:40 +0000

There is no trick: What this guy is saying is that unless we give up our individual constitucional rights we’ll have more investment; the equation is simple: let’s deliver all of our rights for the economy to recover.

By: DolleyMadison

DolleyMadison — Wed, 04 Apr 2012 20:47:36 +0000

Yeah the investors just love those stupid rednecks – easy pickins aren’t they?. Well the tide is changing you fat Yankee piece of excrement. Just try knocking down someone’s door in the South….more than the judgement will be voided, I guarantee it.

By: John

John — Wed, 04 Apr 2012 15:26:05 +0000

I had to play the video a couple of times to determine what it was that he was saying…Creditor’s has rights, secured lenders and be nice to Investors. I’m sorry, did anyone see anything about debtors and their rights. The government has not demanded any accounting for all of our money that was given to them. WHERE THE HELL IS IT?

Non-judicial foreclosures were meant to be an administrative process when a debtor and a creditor agreed to the foreclosure. If there is a disagreement then someone has to file a lawsuit. The law is rigged to that of the Creditor in the non-judicial states.

Thanks for the history lesson which reminds us that no one owns their land, we are all mere tenants to the many States.

Forensic Mortgage Audits and Foreclosure Defense
Student Audits / Auto Loan Audits
oliver@ipa.net

By: Mark Bowen

Mark Bowen — Wed, 04 Apr 2012 14:58:01 +0000

In reply to To Tell The Truth. No, we should all be Super Lien States. Title theory gives rights to the purported lender via Deed of Trust (non-judicial). Lien Theory gives that purported lender only lien rights that must be adjudicated to foreclose (judicial). This guy is very confused.

By: Randy Frodsham

Randy Frodsham — Wed, 04 Apr 2012 13:18:28 +0000

Well this guy isn’t the sharpest tool in the shed. So Harris wants Feinstein’s US Senate seat. What’s that got to do with California law. If Harris wants to change California’s law, she’d have a shot in either the Assembly or State Senate, but could only be a lobbyist for change from a US Senate seat.

By: Charles Fetters

Charles Fetters — Wed, 04 Apr 2012 01:49:13 +0000

Maybe if AG Karmala Harris unseats Senator Dianne Feinstein she will tell how Feinsteinblum took $25 billion of the TARP money to buy foreclosed properties. This would be a smart move if she showed how Feinstein managed to ripped off the tax payers, as she has many times over.
I’m for getting rid of Feinstein. Also if she gets rid of MERS and changes the title of property process before she campaigns for Senate seat.

By: Bobbi Swann

Bobbi Swann — Tue, 03 Apr 2012 21:21:36 +0000

Maybe we should send him a message. His email address is: info@institutionalriskanalytics.com
He sure did a turn-around from his show with Dylan Ratigan back in Jan 2011. A “true bank schill” as I would bet his pockets have now been lined with the swindled funds from the US citizens!

By: Mark Bowen

Mark Bowen — Tue, 03 Apr 2012 21:10:59 +0000

He’s totally confused Title theory and Lien theory. If you watch the video, when this brain-dead says Title theory, he’s really describing Lien Theory, and vice versa. What a D*pSh*t.

By: Ken Hansen

Ken Hansen — Tue, 03 Apr 2012 21:01:56 +0000

These bloated think tankers discuss foreclosure abuses and foreclosure itself as if it is a benign process that needs to take place. Needless to say, the harm on health, families and the entire country is immeasurable.
Not many people,. not the press, not talking heads for think tanks like this guy, will ever consider the fact that Banks intentionally preyed on people, and by doing so, there are few valid contracts to begin with.

By: Faith

Faith — Tue, 03 Apr 2012 20:47:51 +0000

Where is the Chris Whalen that spoke of all the fraud happening at Bear Stearns?

Turncoat