<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: COMPLAINT &#124; DOUG WELBORN AS CLERK OF COURT v BANK OF NY MELLON, BOA, CHASE, CITI, GMAC et al	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://4closurefraud.org/2012/04/18/complaint-doug-welborn-as-clerk-of-court-v-bank-of-ny-mellon-boa-chase-citi-gmac-et-al/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2012/04/18/complaint-doug-welborn-as-clerk-of-court-v-bank-of-ny-mellon-boa-chase-citi-gmac-et-al/</link>
	<description>- Fighting Foreclosure Fraud BY SHARING THE KNOWLEDGE</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2025 16:57:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: zurenarrh		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2012/04/18/complaint-doug-welborn-as-clerk-of-court-v-bank-of-ny-mellon-boa-chase-citi-gmac-et-al/#comment-371062</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[zurenarrh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 05:56:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=45897#comment-371062</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Wow!  This was my argument exactly to a district judge in Mississippi.  That judge never even considered my argument and granted summary judgment to BoA, MERS, Fannie Mae, etc.  I would love to see how this turns out.  Go get &#039;em, Louisiana!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow!  This was my argument exactly to a district judge in Mississippi.  That judge never even considered my argument and granted summary judgment to BoA, MERS, Fannie Mae, etc.  I would love to see how this turns out.  Go get &#8217;em, Louisiana!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: leapfrog		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2012/04/18/complaint-doug-welborn-as-clerk-of-court-v-bank-of-ny-mellon-boa-chase-citi-gmac-et-al/#comment-370995</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[leapfrog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 22:40:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=45897#comment-370995</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://4closurefraud.org/2012/04/18/complaint-doug-welborn-as-clerk-of-court-v-bank-of-ny-mellon-boa-chase-citi-gmac-et-al/#comment-370962&quot;&gt;Hell No - No More Bleeping Bankster Bailouts&lt;/a&gt;.

Qui Tam?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://4closurefraud.org/2012/04/18/complaint-doug-welborn-as-clerk-of-court-v-bank-of-ny-mellon-boa-chase-citi-gmac-et-al/#comment-370962">Hell No &#8211; No More Bleeping Bankster Bailouts</a>.</p>
<p>Qui Tam?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Hell No - No More Bleeping Bankster Bailouts		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2012/04/18/complaint-doug-welborn-as-clerk-of-court-v-bank-of-ny-mellon-boa-chase-citi-gmac-et-al/#comment-370962</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hell No - No More Bleeping Bankster Bailouts]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 20:04:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=45897#comment-370962</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I note that the law firm views this as a test case. The complaint filed shows the Louisiana court clerks seem to have joined together in this action.

What would be interesting to see is an analysis of this suit to see if it is more likely to progress than some other suits in other states where the clerks were viewed as not being the proper parties to bring suit.

Also, it would be interesting to have an analysis done of which states this type of suit could possibly work in. 

In the states where the clerks are not allowed to sue, is there any ability for any appropriate party other than the clerks to bring suit? I presume that normally only the AGs can otherwise bring suit unless somehow a group of citizens can claim to be the ones who have been harmed?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I note that the law firm views this as a test case. The complaint filed shows the Louisiana court clerks seem to have joined together in this action.</p>
<p>What would be interesting to see is an analysis of this suit to see if it is more likely to progress than some other suits in other states where the clerks were viewed as not being the proper parties to bring suit.</p>
<p>Also, it would be interesting to have an analysis done of which states this type of suit could possibly work in. </p>
<p>In the states where the clerks are not allowed to sue, is there any ability for any appropriate party other than the clerks to bring suit? I presume that normally only the AGs can otherwise bring suit unless somehow a group of citizens can claim to be the ones who have been harmed?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
