<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Eviction Halted &#124; Judge Orders Discovery To Establish Legitimacy Of Dubious &#8216;Linda Green&#8217; Mortgage Assignment	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://4closurefraud.org/2012/04/26/eviction-halted-judge-orders-discovery-to-establish-legitimacy-of-dubious-linda-green-mortgage-assignment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2012/04/26/eviction-halted-judge-orders-discovery-to-establish-legitimacy-of-dubious-linda-green-mortgage-assignment/</link>
	<description>- Fighting Foreclosure Fraud BY SHARING THE KNOWLEDGE</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 16:28:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Bobbi Swann		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2012/04/26/eviction-halted-judge-orders-discovery-to-establish-legitimacy-of-dubious-linda-green-mortgage-assignment/#comment-372874</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bobbi Swann]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 16:28:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=46273#comment-372874</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[What I don&#039;t get is why 1) if the assignment is produced to be forged and 2) thus, rendered useless in proving ownership then 3) why would there be any standing to foreclose when the original mortgagee is now ceased in operations?  If no standing is proven in court that would make the note/mortgage unenforceable and thus null and void.   I have a mortgage with Chase that is in foreclosure but not one of the WAMU loans.  Actually the plaintiff was showing Chase Home Finance LLC which I found was not even a registered business in the state of Florida and submitted as such in my Motion To Dismiss and proving no standing to foreclose.  They tried to &#039;fix&#039; it by a merger of Chase Home Finance LLC to Chase Bank in May 2011 but you can&#039;t fix merging a company that was not authorized to do business with a parent company and then still claim you have standing.  And the so-called Assignment of Mortgage filed of record clearly indicates from the recorder on the face of the document  that the &quot;recording information was not sufficient&quot;.  They didn&#039;t even note the recording of the mortgage on my property within the body of the assignment.  Chase is scum.....pure and simple!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I don&#8217;t get is why 1) if the assignment is produced to be forged and 2) thus, rendered useless in proving ownership then 3) why would there be any standing to foreclose when the original mortgagee is now ceased in operations?  If no standing is proven in court that would make the note/mortgage unenforceable and thus null and void.   I have a mortgage with Chase that is in foreclosure but not one of the WAMU loans.  Actually the plaintiff was showing Chase Home Finance LLC which I found was not even a registered business in the state of Florida and submitted as such in my Motion To Dismiss and proving no standing to foreclose.  They tried to &#8216;fix&#8217; it by a merger of Chase Home Finance LLC to Chase Bank in May 2011 but you can&#8217;t fix merging a company that was not authorized to do business with a parent company and then still claim you have standing.  And the so-called Assignment of Mortgage filed of record clearly indicates from the recorder on the face of the document  that the &#8220;recording information was not sufficient&#8221;.  They didn&#8217;t even note the recording of the mortgage on my property within the body of the assignment.  Chase is scum&#8230;..pure and simple!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ronald Williams		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2012/04/26/eviction-halted-judge-orders-discovery-to-establish-legitimacy-of-dubious-linda-green-mortgage-assignment/#comment-372589</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ronald Williams]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 22:22:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=46273#comment-372589</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The biggest fraudulent scheme nationwide is being practiced by JPMorgan Chase Bank pertaining to the loans originated by Washington Mutual Bank before Washington Mutual Bank was placed in receivership. Chase Bank has acheived remarkable success acquiring and maintaining receivership status over mortgage notes originated by WaMu but not part of its portfolio when the FDIC closed WaMu. Unfortunately judges both state and federal all over the nation are complicit in all of this. Judges are ruling in favor of Chase Bank based only on evidence consisting of &quot;selective&quot; parts of the Purchase and Assumption Agreement between Chase and the FDIC. The part mysteriously not produced by Chase in courts all over is the schedule that lists the notes and trust deeds actually placed in receivership by the FDIC. The FDIC is complicit for not making readily available the schedule of the notes it placed in receivership. Whenever you see a lawsuit against Chase where Chase represents only being the servicer appointed by the FDIC where the FDIC had not joined as a defendant, you know that Chase has been fraudulently misrepresenting itself as FDIC&#039;s mortgage collector. (servicer) Under the Federal Deposit Insurance Act if the FDIC had placed a particular mortgage note in receivership, it was bound by law to have notified the borrower. The ACT also requires the borrower prior to suing to present their claims directly to the FDIC. Chase has been defending lawsuits where it feigns being assigned to service a note on behalf of the FDIC without making any effort (in most cases) to join the FDIC in the lawsuit. That is because if they do, it would expose the FDIC as not having placed the note in receivership, thus Chase&#039;s lie of claiming that it had. Finally, it is hard to believe that judges - particularly federal judges are not aware of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act and how it would expose Chase when it lies about collecting mortgage payments as servicer for the FDIC.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The biggest fraudulent scheme nationwide is being practiced by JPMorgan Chase Bank pertaining to the loans originated by Washington Mutual Bank before Washington Mutual Bank was placed in receivership. Chase Bank has acheived remarkable success acquiring and maintaining receivership status over mortgage notes originated by WaMu but not part of its portfolio when the FDIC closed WaMu. Unfortunately judges both state and federal all over the nation are complicit in all of this. Judges are ruling in favor of Chase Bank based only on evidence consisting of &#8220;selective&#8221; parts of the Purchase and Assumption Agreement between Chase and the FDIC. The part mysteriously not produced by Chase in courts all over is the schedule that lists the notes and trust deeds actually placed in receivership by the FDIC. The FDIC is complicit for not making readily available the schedule of the notes it placed in receivership. Whenever you see a lawsuit against Chase where Chase represents only being the servicer appointed by the FDIC where the FDIC had not joined as a defendant, you know that Chase has been fraudulently misrepresenting itself as FDIC&#8217;s mortgage collector. (servicer) Under the Federal Deposit Insurance Act if the FDIC had placed a particular mortgage note in receivership, it was bound by law to have notified the borrower. The ACT also requires the borrower prior to suing to present their claims directly to the FDIC. Chase has been defending lawsuits where it feigns being assigned to service a note on behalf of the FDIC without making any effort (in most cases) to join the FDIC in the lawsuit. That is because if they do, it would expose the FDIC as not having placed the note in receivership, thus Chase&#8217;s lie of claiming that it had. Finally, it is hard to believe that judges &#8211; particularly federal judges are not aware of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act and how it would expose Chase when it lies about collecting mortgage payments as servicer for the FDIC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: incognito123		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2012/04/26/eviction-halted-judge-orders-discovery-to-establish-legitimacy-of-dubious-linda-green-mortgage-assignment/#comment-372548</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[incognito123]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 17:02:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=46273#comment-372548</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Nice, a judge actually took the time to READ what was put in front of them, different!!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice, a judge actually took the time to READ what was put in front of them, different!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: talktotennessee		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2012/04/26/eviction-halted-judge-orders-discovery-to-establish-legitimacy-of-dubious-linda-green-mortgage-assignment/#comment-372543</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[talktotennessee]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 16:49:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=46273#comment-372543</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://4closurefraud.org/2012/04/26/eviction-halted-judge-orders-discovery-to-establish-legitimacy-of-dubious-linda-green-mortgage-assignment/#comment-372456&quot;&gt;OhioFRAUDclosure&lt;/a&gt;.

No prosecution? The banks LEGALLY hung out the people who executed the forgery (the Linda Greens) as that was the intent; to pass the buck. Who authorized the signing? These are the people who need criminal charges of forgery to avoid paying transfer fees and legal chain of title.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://4closurefraud.org/2012/04/26/eviction-halted-judge-orders-discovery-to-establish-legitimacy-of-dubious-linda-green-mortgage-assignment/#comment-372456">OhioFRAUDclosure</a>.</p>
<p>No prosecution? The banks LEGALLY hung out the people who executed the forgery (the Linda Greens) as that was the intent; to pass the buck. Who authorized the signing? These are the people who need criminal charges of forgery to avoid paying transfer fees and legal chain of title.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: talktotennessee		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2012/04/26/eviction-halted-judge-orders-discovery-to-establish-legitimacy-of-dubious-linda-green-mortgage-assignment/#comment-372542</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[talktotennessee]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 16:45:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=46273#comment-372542</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://4closurefraud.org/2012/04/26/eviction-halted-judge-orders-discovery-to-establish-legitimacy-of-dubious-linda-green-mortgage-assignment/#comment-372386&quot;&gt;Barbra Orr&lt;/a&gt;.

None of them are real!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://4closurefraud.org/2012/04/26/eviction-halted-judge-orders-discovery-to-establish-legitimacy-of-dubious-linda-green-mortgage-assignment/#comment-372386">Barbra Orr</a>.</p>
<p>None of them are real!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: OhioFRAUDclosure		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2012/04/26/eviction-halted-judge-orders-discovery-to-establish-legitimacy-of-dubious-linda-green-mortgage-assignment/#comment-372456</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[OhioFRAUDclosure]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 02:45:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=46273#comment-372456</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Watch the Confessions to Criminal Acts - by ALL 3 Linda Greens

http://ohiofraudclosure.blogspot.com/2011/08/linda-green-fraudclosure-crime-scene.html]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Watch the Confessions to Criminal Acts &#8211; by ALL 3 Linda Greens</p>
<p><a href="http://ohiofraudclosure.blogspot.com/2011/08/linda-green-fraudclosure-crime-scene.html" rel="nofollow ugc">http://ohiofraudclosure.blogspot.com/2011/08/linda-green-fraudclosure-crime-scene.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: neidermeyer		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2012/04/26/eviction-halted-judge-orders-discovery-to-establish-legitimacy-of-dubious-linda-green-mortgage-assignment/#comment-372398</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[neidermeyer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 20:02:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=46273#comment-372398</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://4closurefraud.org/2012/04/26/eviction-halted-judge-orders-discovery-to-establish-legitimacy-of-dubious-linda-green-mortgage-assignment/#comment-372386&quot;&gt;Barbra Orr&lt;/a&gt;.

According to Linda Green even if she did in fact sign a particular paper it has no legal weight as she never had knowledge of what she was attesting to.. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eUYMAGWJkz0]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://4closurefraud.org/2012/04/26/eviction-halted-judge-orders-discovery-to-establish-legitimacy-of-dubious-linda-green-mortgage-assignment/#comment-372386">Barbra Orr</a>.</p>
<p>According to Linda Green even if she did in fact sign a particular paper it has no legal weight as she never had knowledge of what she was attesting to.. <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eUYMAGWJkz0" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eUYMAGWJkz0</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Barbra Orr		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2012/04/26/eviction-halted-judge-orders-discovery-to-establish-legitimacy-of-dubious-linda-green-mortgage-assignment/#comment-372386</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Barbra Orr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 19:01:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=46273#comment-372386</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[THANK YOU FOR THE EXAMPLES. I CAN SEE WHY IT IS SUCH A BIG DEAL. LINDA GREEN SIGNED ALL OF THOSE? WHICH IS THE REAL SIGNATURE?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>THANK YOU FOR THE EXAMPLES. I CAN SEE WHY IT IS SUCH A BIG DEAL. LINDA GREEN SIGNED ALL OF THOSE? WHICH IS THE REAL SIGNATURE?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
