@ Mr. Rice.

Here’s a question I have and I am only asking for your opinion. We refinanced through a mortgage broker. In a conversation with him, he informed me that he has investors. MERS on DOT. So on the DOT and Note the mortgage broker is listed as “Lender” as well on other docs. On the top of DOT it says after recording please return to Bank O. In the paperwork at signing Bank O was assigned to be the servicer. Where we were to make the payments. Now on my HUD-1 statement it lists Bank O as the “Lender”. This may not mean anyrhing but on a doc titled “Itemization of Amount Financed” the creditor is listed as the Mortgage Broker. On that doc they list Prepaid Finance Charges in which they have a “loan set up fee paid to Bank O and also a “table funding fee to Bank O. Bank O is no longer. Who in your opinion would be my lender? I have not been able to find anything for either in the SEC. Anyone any input?

I have the original papers from when I purchased my home?

YOU HAVE A CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO BE PROTECTED, AND IF YOU HAVE YOUR PROOF AND THE TRUTH BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT THEN THE JUDGE IS VIOLATING YOUR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT THAT HE’S SWORN UNDER OATH TO PROTECT. THEN HE’S VIOLATED HIS OATH…

Oath of Office for Federal Officials

Employees of the United States Government including all members of Congress are required to take the following oath before assuming elected or appointed office.

5 U.S.C. 3331:

“An individual, except the President, elected or appointed to an office of honor or profit in the civil service or uniformed services shall take the following oath: ‘I, AB, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.'”

United States Constitution

Article VI, Section 3

The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the members of the several state legislatures, and all executive and judicial officers, both of the United States and of the several states, shall be bound by oath or affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States.

5 U.S.C. 3333:

“…an individual who accepts office or employment in the Government of the United states…shall execute an affidavit within 60 days after accepting the office or employment that his acceptance and holding of the office or employment does not or will not violate section 7311 of this title. The affidavit is prima facie evidence that the acceptance and holding of office or employment by the affiant does not or will not violate section 7311 of this title.”

Federal Law Prohibiting Federal Officials

From Advocating Overthrow of Government

Federal law specifically prohibits any individual from accepting or holding any position (including elected office) in the United States Government if he advocates the overthrow of our constitutional form of government.

5 U.S.C. 7311 (1):

“An individual may not accept or hold a position in the Government of the United States of the government of the District of Columbia if he (1) advocates the overthrow of our constitutional form of government…”

Advocate:

advocate: To plead in favor of : defend by argument before a tribunal or the public : support or recommend publicly. Webster’s Third New International Dictionary

Advocate: To speak in favor of or defend by argument. To support, vindicate, or recommend publicly. Black’s Law Dictionary

Federal Criminal Penalty for Violation of Oath of Office

Federal criminal law is explicit and direct regarding a violation of oath of office by federal officials which includes all members of Congress. The law requires the removal of the office holder as well a prison term or fine for the offender.

18 U.S.C. 1918:

“Whoever violates the provisions of section 7311 of title 5 that an individual may not accept or hold a position in the Government of the United States or the government of the District of Columbia if he (1) advocates the overthrow of our constitutional form of government [and] shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year and a day or both.”

Executive Order 10450

In order to instruct investigating federal officials such as the FBI as to what is a violation of the oath of office under 5 U.S.C. 3331 and 5 U.S.C. 7311, Executive Order 10450 was issued to serve as a guideline for determining what actions constituted a criminal violation of the oath of office by federal officials. The order affirms thelaw of 5 U.S.C. 7311 that is a criminal violation under 18 U.S.C. 1918 for a member of the government, which includes members of Congress, to “advocate the overthrow of our constitutional form of government.”

Executive Order 10450 states (in part): “Whereas the interest of the national security require that all persons privileged to be employed in…the Government shall be reliable, trustworthy, of good conduct and character, and of complete and unswerving loyalty to the United States… it is hereby ordered as follows:

(a) The investigations conducted pursuant to this order shall be designed to develop information as to whether the employment or retention in employment…of the person being investigated is clearly consistent with the interests of the national security. Such information shall relate, but shall not be limited, to the following:

(4) Advocacy of use of force or violence to overthrow the government of the United States, or of the alteration of the form of the government of the United States by unconstitutional means.”

§ 241. Conspiracy against rights

How Current is This?

If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or because of his having so exercised the same; or

If two or more persons go in disguise on the highway, or on the premises of another, with intent to prevent or hinder his free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege so secured-

They shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, they shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.

§ 242. Deprivation of rights under color of law

How Current is This?

Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or to different punishments, pains, or penalties, on account of such person being an alien, or by reason of his color, or race, than are prescribed for the punishment of citizens, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.

GET YOUR EVIDENCE TOGETHER AND FILE YOUR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT…

THEN THE JUDGE IS VIOLATING HIS OATH… THAT’S FRAUD

YOU HAVE TO GATHER YOUR EVIDENCE, AND PUT THE JUDGE ON NOTICE THAT HE’S UNDER OATH TO PROTECT YOU.

IF YOU HAVE YOUR PROOF OF YOUR HOME IN THE CHAIN OF SECURITIZATION BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT, AND YOUR LENDER SOLD YOUR MORTGAGE TO WALL STREET AND THE DEED AND NOTE WAS DESTROYED…

THEN IT BECAME A STOCK OPTION, AND IT CAN NOT BE REVERSED BACK INTO A MORTGAGE LOAN DEBT.

YOUR LENDER IS THE ONLY ONE THAT CAN ASSIGN A SUBSTITUTE TRUSTEE, AND FORECLOSE ON YOU… NO ONE ELSE.

IN YOUR DEED OF TRUST IT WILL SAY MERS IS ONLY ASSIGNED AS A NOMINEE.

THE LENDER HAS TO GIVE THE POWER FOR IT MERS TO ASSIGN. IT NEVER DID…
IT’S FRAUD…

IF ANY BANK CLAIMS THAT THEY HAVE YOUR DEED AND PROMISE NOTE THEN IT’S FRAUD BECA– USE IT SHOULD BE IN THE HANDS OF THE PSA, AND NOW THE BANKS ARE DOUBLE DIPPING ON A SECURITIZED PROPERTY WHICH IS FRAUD.

THE BANKS ARE NOT THE REAL PARTY OF INTEREST…

YOUR MORTGAGE IS SECURITIZED IN A TRUST WITH 2000 to 5000 HOMES AND THE TRUST IS NOT INTERESTED IN FORECLOSING.

GOOGLE DOWN LOAD “THE EXPLANATION OF SECURITIZATION” SUBMIT YOUR EVIDENCE TO THE JUDGE SO HE CAN UNDERSTAND WITH YOUR CASES TO ARGUE.

Just quoting Leonard Cohen to say that I concur that the judges don’t give a shit. They don’t follow the law. They are partial and compromised. They could be saving us from the banks, but instead they are feeding us to the banks.

It would be great to see some of these Banksters and judges go to jail for not following the law. Then I know this country might have a chance. For now it seems we are getting owned everyday more and more by the banks. Our civil rights are also going down the tubes. TSA Thanks to Bush. NDAA thanks to Obama.
Our money being printed and worth nothing, Bernanki. Buy gold and head for the hills!

Wrong! When two notes exist it is presumed both a frauds until it can be figured out. The only reason a the state court judge would do that is because he or she is a bank lover, like most state judges. I doubt this will be ignored and even if, the Federal Bankruptcy court can give and order to the state court removing the Summary judgement and sale. The state court will have to do what the federal court says or the judge will be in contempt. The courts need to put these people in jail. I would be very impressed to see that.