https://4closurefraud.org/2012/05/10/affidavits-are-not-a-substitute-for-evidence-of-debt-ownership/ - Fighting Foreclosure Fraud BY SHARING THE KNOWLEDGE Mon, 01 Dec 2025 17:05:39 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.2 https://4closurefraud.org/2012/05/10/affidavits-are-not-a-substitute-for-evidence-of-debt-ownership/#comment-374710 Mon, 14 May 2012 14:35:45 +0000 https://4closurefraud.org/?p=46717#comment-374710 Well, we have the same type of law here in Florida. How many times do you see “affidavit of lost note” in a foreclosure case? And how many times will a judge accept that affidavit and issue a final judgement in favor of the bank and set a sheriff’s sale? I am fighting my case now on just that same premise. 3 years later the lender all of a sudden finds the note but only submits a “copy” to the courts – not the original as is mandated by the Florida Statutes. They never ammended the original complaint; just filed a Notice of Filing…WTF? Then, because it was Florida Default Group (yea, you know them) they filed another notice to change the name of the law firm from Florida Default Group to Ronald R. Wolfe & Assoc. Very good because this same group is now being investigated for FRAUD by the elustrious Bondi. To make matters even better the note was supposedly assigned from the original lender to Chase Bank but the plaintiff in my case is Chase Home Finance LLC, which turns out was not even registered with the State of Florida as a lender. There is no assignment of record from Chase Bank to Chase Home Finance LLC but here they claim (3 years after the fact) that Chase Bank merged with Chase Home Finance in May 2011 – 3 years after the initial filing of my foreclosure! Talk about fraud!!! So, here I go again with another filing to the courts……

]]>