<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: BONY V PINO &#124; Florida Supreme Court Oral Arguments Live Thursday May 10, 2012 @ 9:00AM EST	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://4closurefraud.org/2012/05/10/bony-v-pino-florida-supreme-court-oral-arguments-live-thursday-may-10-2012-900am-est/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2012/05/10/bony-v-pino-florida-supreme-court-oral-arguments-live-thursday-may-10-2012-900am-est/</link>
	<description>- Fighting Foreclosure Fraud BY SHARING THE KNOWLEDGE</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2025 13:52:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: j Alonzo		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2012/05/10/bony-v-pino-florida-supreme-court-oral-arguments-live-thursday-may-10-2012-900am-est/#comment-374287</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[j Alonzo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 15:30:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=46668#comment-374287</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://4closurefraud.org/2012/05/10/bony-v-pino-florida-supreme-court-oral-arguments-live-thursday-may-10-2012-900am-est/#comment-374277&quot;&gt;thisblows&lt;/a&gt;.

Yes your are correct. It was making me so mad! I hope it was just a strong case of wanting the truth. I then noticed most of judges stayed quite for the Banksters attorneys. Maybe it was because one judge was already giving him a hard time, or it was because the other justices already made up their mind, to rule in favor of the banks. If this is the case. This proves are whole judicial system in Florida is CORRUPT! I hope something good comes from this, but I dont know if that will be the case.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://4closurefraud.org/2012/05/10/bony-v-pino-florida-supreme-court-oral-arguments-live-thursday-may-10-2012-900am-est/#comment-374277">thisblows</a>.</p>
<p>Yes your are correct. It was making me so mad! I hope it was just a strong case of wanting the truth. I then noticed most of judges stayed quite for the Banksters attorneys. Maybe it was because one judge was already giving him a hard time, or it was because the other justices already made up their mind, to rule in favor of the banks. If this is the case. This proves are whole judicial system in Florida is CORRUPT! I hope something good comes from this, but I dont know if that will be the case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Equity Free		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2012/05/10/bony-v-pino-florida-supreme-court-oral-arguments-live-thursday-may-10-2012-900am-est/#comment-374279</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Equity Free]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 14:07:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=46668#comment-374279</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Bravo ,  Amanda !]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bravo ,  Amanda !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: thisblows		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2012/05/10/bony-v-pino-florida-supreme-court-oral-arguments-live-thursday-may-10-2012-900am-est/#comment-374277</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[thisblows]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 14:02:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=46668#comment-374277</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Notice how these Supreme Court judges constantly interrupted the Ice&#039;s attorney yet kept very quiet while the sheister old fart attorney for the bank spoke. Canady was especially quiet for the bank&#039;s attorney. 

This will go no where. Changing the law would mean more work for the court and these judges look like they do not want to work nor care too much for the homeowner.

Only Judge Pariente seemed to be fair and somewhat sympathetic to the homeowner, that can not afford legal counsel.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Notice how these Supreme Court judges constantly interrupted the Ice&#8217;s attorney yet kept very quiet while the sheister old fart attorney for the bank spoke. Canady was especially quiet for the bank&#8217;s attorney. </p>
<p>This will go no where. Changing the law would mean more work for the court and these judges look like they do not want to work nor care too much for the homeowner.</p>
<p>Only Judge Pariente seemed to be fair and somewhat sympathetic to the homeowner, that can not afford legal counsel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: pat sullivan		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2012/05/10/bony-v-pino-florida-supreme-court-oral-arguments-live-thursday-may-10-2012-900am-est/#comment-374273</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[pat sullivan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 13:29:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=46668#comment-374273</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[817.54 Obtaining of mortgage, mortgage note, promissory note, etc., by false representation.—Any person who, with intent to defraud, obtains any mortgage, mortgage note, promissory note or other instrument evidencing a debt from any person or obtains the signature of any person to any mortgage, mortgage note, promissory note or other instrument evidencing a debt by color or aid of fraudulent or false representation or pretenses, or obtains the signature of any person to a mortgage, mortgage note, promissory note, or other instrument evidencing a debt, the false making whereof would be punishable as forgery, shall be guilty of a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>817.54 Obtaining of mortgage, mortgage note, promissory note, etc., by false representation.—Any person who, with intent to defraud, obtains any mortgage, mortgage note, promissory note or other instrument evidencing a debt from any person or obtains the signature of any person to any mortgage, mortgage note, promissory note or other instrument evidencing a debt by color or aid of fraudulent or false representation or pretenses, or obtains the signature of any person to a mortgage, mortgage note, promissory note, or other instrument evidencing a debt, the false making whereof would be punishable as forgery, shall be guilty of a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
