So John You Work for MERS ??????? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ByfDDUl52rk&list=UUbxC1jCRE-fAgx48ExIAsbg

THESE ASSHOLES DON’T CARE THEY’RE ON “KICK-BACKS” & “ORGANIZED-CRIME ”

YOU HAVE A BETTER CHANCE DEALING W/ THE “M-O-B”

THERE IS “NO” JUSTICE” ONLY MORE “INJUSTICE” MAY GOD GET ALL THESE CORRUPT JUDGES,

ATTY,’S W/ “NO” CLIENTS & BANKS & I HOPE THEY ALL DIE A LONG SLOW & MISERABLE DEATH LIKE

WE’VE BEEN TORTURED TO LOSE EVERTHING ILLEGALLY …PAYBACK’S A BITCH BUT REVENGE IS

AN ORGASM….THE JUDGE’S ALL SUCK THEY RE PATHETIC THEY ARE SADISTIC

THESE ASSHOLES DON’T CARE THEY’RE ON “KICK-BACKS” & “ORGANIZED-CRIME ”

YOU HAVE A BETTER CHANCE DEALING W/ THE “M-O-B”

THERE IS “NO” JUSTICE” ONLY MORE “INJUSTICE” MAY GOD GET ALL THESE CORRUPT JUDGES,

ATTY,’S W/ “NO” CLIENTS & BANKS & I HOPE THEY ALL DIE A LONG SLOW & MISERABLE DEATH LIKE

WE’VE BEEN TORTURED TO LOSE EVERTHING ILLEGALLY …PAYBACK’S A BITCH BUT REVENGE IS

AN ORGASM….THE JUDGE’S ALL SUCK THEY RE PATHETIC THEY ARE SADIST IC

It seems pretty clear that a mortgage owner’s rights are different than a mortgage holder’s rights vis a vis right to foreclose. As I was reading another great article from Abigail, I thought of this analogy. Let’s say I walking down the street and I find a car title. Does that mean I can go “take” the car associated with the title? What if I falsified a chain of title making it appear as though I was the “legitimate” owner of the title. Of course, I would go to jail but let’s assume I am a financial institution and therefore immune from the responsibility of breaking common law against fraud. I’m sure I am not the first to think of this analogy…

I would love to hear from someone in the trenches on this most meaningful decision. Like Abigail said: only those that fight this fraud have an opportunity to challenge note ownership vs. note holder.

I disagree with Ms. Field’s statement that she felt the SJC’s ruling is “doctrinally reasonable and arguably protects many innocent third parties”… fraud is Fraud is FRAUD… it’s NOT reasonable nor arguable to continue to shield this far-reaching and explicit fraud so blatently committed by the mega-banksters, their servicers, and their lapdog lawyers… what of the many innocent first party homeowner victims harmed by this wild web of deceit and defrauding?? Any “innocent third parties” wronged still have their rightful recourses too… let them sue the fraud-makers, not simply reap the rewards of foreclosure fraud! They have title insurance (which, as you may recall, Uncle Scam already helped underwrite with past bailouts such as to AIM)… so where is their harm? They could and should recover any damages or financial harm by suing the fraud-makers and likewise by submitting their legitimate claims with their title insurers, etc.