<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Neighbors Seek City&#8217;s Help to Remove Unwelcome Guests from a Foreclosed Home Now Owned By Chase	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://4closurefraud.org/2012/10/07/neighbors-seek-citys-help-to-remove-unwelcome-guests-from-a-foreclosed-home-now-owned-by-chase/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2012/10/07/neighbors-seek-citys-help-to-remove-unwelcome-guests-from-a-foreclosed-home-now-owned-by-chase/</link>
	<description>- Fighting Foreclosure Fraud BY SHARING THE KNOWLEDGE</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Oct 2012 14:32:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Stupendous Man - Defender of Liberty, Foe of Tyranny		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2012/10/07/neighbors-seek-citys-help-to-remove-unwelcome-guests-from-a-foreclosed-home-now-owned-by-chase/#comment-403752</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stupendous Man - Defender of Liberty, Foe of Tyranny]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Oct 2012 14:32:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=54148#comment-403752</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The city should first issue citations, a notice to cure, and fines upon the homeowner, which is alleged to be JPMC.  The city should then contract with a local beekeeper to remove the hive.  The city should seek compensation from JPMC for the cost of the contract.  If JPMC doesn&#039;t pay it should be sued for collection.  Most civil rules allow for the prevailing to recover costs.  Whether the city can recover costs I can&#039;t say.  Someone needs to dig into the case law on that.  If it can just imagine the hourly rate the city could/would charge for such actions.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The city should first issue citations, a notice to cure, and fines upon the homeowner, which is alleged to be JPMC.  The city should then contract with a local beekeeper to remove the hive.  The city should seek compensation from JPMC for the cost of the contract.  If JPMC doesn&#8217;t pay it should be sued for collection.  Most civil rules allow for the prevailing to recover costs.  Whether the city can recover costs I can&#8217;t say.  Someone needs to dig into the case law on that.  If it can just imagine the hourly rate the city could/would charge for such actions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
