By: Ken Hansen

Ken Hansen — Mon, 12 Nov 2012 00:59:38 +0000

“issued defective mortgages and sold them to Fannie Mae ” This happened in one form or another by a multitude of actors, including those on the inside and the outside. Clearly Fannie Mae must have known giving 400K or more to people who may have been unemployed a month earlier was probably a bad idea, but they gave preference to the get rich quick scheme. They know it, we know it, everyone knows it. The fact a whistleblower is needed to mount an effective action suggests the action will fail, and that Justice isn’t really the end goal. After Enron, WorldCom, Tyco and all the crap that happened less than a decade before THIS crisis clearly shows this country has some catastrophically serious problems. Incidentally, the Banksters knew all about those theft riddled corporate disasters from the .com era. And then housing came along..

By: bobbi swann

bobbi swann — Sun, 11 Nov 2012 15:55:05 +0000

Curujious, what was the outcome of the suit against this whistleblower by the investor? Was he found to be guilty? Did he lose the suit or was it dismissed? I fail to see where a suit filed means ‘guilty’. This post would hold far more integrity if the result of that suit were identified. Otherwise, it’s just another one of the bankster’s plots to discredit the facts.

Comments on: BofA $1 Billion Whistleblower Also Faced Fraud Claims

By: Ken Hansen

By: bobbi swann