<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: CASE COMPILATION &#8211; FORECLOSURES BY TRUSTS CASES DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://4closurefraud.org/2012/11/19/case-compilation-foreclosures-by-trusts-cases-dismissed-with-prejudice/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2012/11/19/case-compilation-foreclosures-by-trusts-cases-dismissed-with-prejudice/</link>
	<description>- Fighting Foreclosure Fraud BY SHARING THE KNOWLEDGE</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2012 15:02:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: 4closureFraud		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2012/11/19/case-compilation-foreclosures-by-trusts-cases-dismissed-with-prejudice/#comment-405080</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[4closureFraud]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2012 15:02:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=55365#comment-405080</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://4closurefraud.org/2012/11/19/case-compilation-foreclosures-by-trusts-cases-dismissed-with-prejudice/#comment-405078&quot;&gt;Jason Werner&lt;/a&gt;.

Jason,

I suggest you research the cases sited above before making such a blanket statement about the information being totally false. Cases are being dismissed both with and without prejudice, however rare, along with many others that &quot;settle&quot; under a confidentiality agreement.

Yes, ALL cases are different as you stated, with some being dismissed w/ prejudice. Do they come back under a different bank or trust later? It&#039;s possible.

Don&#039;t get me wrong, a few wins vs millions of losses is no victory but the info provided above is to assist others to possibly succeed, at least until the next foreclosure comes.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://4closurefraud.org/2012/11/19/case-compilation-foreclosures-by-trusts-cases-dismissed-with-prejudice/#comment-405078">Jason Werner</a>.</p>
<p>Jason,</p>
<p>I suggest you research the cases sited above before making such a blanket statement about the information being totally false. Cases are being dismissed both with and without prejudice, however rare, along with many others that &#8220;settle&#8221; under a confidentiality agreement.</p>
<p>Yes, ALL cases are different as you stated, with some being dismissed w/ prejudice. Do they come back under a different bank or trust later? It&#8217;s possible.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t get me wrong, a few wins vs millions of losses is no victory but the info provided above is to assist others to possibly succeed, at least until the next foreclosure comes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jason Werner		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2012/11/19/case-compilation-foreclosures-by-trusts-cases-dismissed-with-prejudice/#comment-405078</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Werner]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2012 14:40:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=55365#comment-405078</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The information provided is totally false.  Cases are truly not getting dismissed like that with prejudice; I know because I&#039;ve been in cases andreviewed thousands.

I have found that ALL cases are a different, rarely anything gets dismissed for any circumstance for the victim&#039;s (borrower&#039;s favor) because it is the criminal (bank) attorney bringing the loot (case) to the whorehouse (courthouse).  Whores (judges) do not care about law; judges care about sex, drugs, and getting paid cash; this is a fact.  I explained all this to the FBI in 2008 and they did not deny it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The information provided is totally false.  Cases are truly not getting dismissed like that with prejudice; I know because I&#8217;ve been in cases andreviewed thousands.</p>
<p>I have found that ALL cases are a different, rarely anything gets dismissed for any circumstance for the victim&#8217;s (borrower&#8217;s favor) because it is the criminal (bank) attorney bringing the loot (case) to the whorehouse (courthouse).  Whores (judges) do not care about law; judges care about sex, drugs, and getting paid cash; this is a fact.  I explained all this to the FBI in 2008 and they did not deny it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
