Comments on: Office of Mortgage Settlement Oversight – Continued Progress: A Report from the Monitor of the National Mortgage Settlement

By: papergate

papergate — Wed, 21 Nov 2012 03:24:52 +0000

And why we are at it let’s get a list of all lenders, servicers (pretenders whatever) who used LPS from 2008 on – in every state – not just FL – let’s see who the players are for real from this indictment – a list please of every co-conspiring party – lender, servicer – whatever they call themselves these days – we need to create a cross-country thorough inventory of all the player’s names and related states since LPS has obviously been acting overtly in all states. . . and it is only going to come from homeowners because they are the ones with the docs and the names. Let’s begin with i.e., PHH Mortgage Corporation, ERA Mortgage, CoreLogic, for starts . . .

By: papergate

papergate — Wed, 21 Nov 2012 03:18:34 +0000

Yes, and how it is strictly the “five” – what about all the unknown entities that may or may not be veils for the big five – a homeowner may be part of the issue and not know about it due to disclosures or lack thereof of who is really behind their transactions – this needs to be part of the solution – official demands that these financial entities disclose who is behind the transactions – and may be part of this big five deal but because they do not have any way of an entity telling them that their mortgage transaction was really part of BofA or whatever, that is part of this mortgage settlement for example, there needs to be a cross checking on each of the ‘lenders’ because obviously they got the table funds from these big five but how would a homeowner know which one applied to their transaction? I agree this is just smoke and mirrors – as indicated in the charts there are no listings about how much was paid as ‘damages’ to wrongful foreclosures, etc., in this list . . . hmmm?? And what about a list of all the servicers being reported by consumers and attorneys defending – let’s get a list going so we can see what the names of the pretenders are doing with this so-called monitoring program – see if our cases are starting to show up by way of pretender lender names??

By: Sarah

Sarah — Mon, 19 Nov 2012 21:01:23 +0000

Does consumer relief mean homelessness? Sure, sometimes. Why won’t Katherine Porter advocate for treating mortgage debt like all other debt? Taboo? She’d get fired? Too many people make money off of the suffering of others ergo we can’t change anything that’s spectacularly unfair? The dishonest Bankster “moral hazard” argument?

By: bobbi swann

bobbi swann — Mon, 19 Nov 2012 16:00:48 +0000

I am truly amazed when I read this crap! Joseph Smith states he puts this report together for the benefit of the consumer via communication. But where is his contact information? His phone number or his email? Fax number? Where is he getting these so-called facts? Surely not from the consumer….OH betcha it’s coming from the lenders, the trustworthy, faithful and forever honest banksters! BTW who is paying this Joseph Smith for this ‘wonderful’ enlightening report? With all the graphs and suppositions and forecasts? More smoke and mirrors. Just another bankster phoney who is making $$$$ off the backs of the middle class who has suffered immensely from the crooked and corrupt politicians with hands raised to line their pockets. And if any one citizen believes in this garbage, well now they have another 4 years of more lies and deceit coming from Washington!