<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: In an F.H.A. Checkup, a Startling Number	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://4closurefraud.org/2012/12/03/in-an-f-h-a-checkup-a-startling-number/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2012/12/03/in-an-f-h-a-checkup-a-startling-number/</link>
	<description>- Fighting Foreclosure Fraud BY SHARING THE KNOWLEDGE</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2025 17:49:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Sarah		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2012/12/03/in-an-f-h-a-checkup-a-startling-number/#comment-405578</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarah]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2012 17:08:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=55754#comment-405578</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In fact, GM implied that principle reduction on unaffordable liars loans would be a &quot;bailout for banks&quot;. Why? If these losses are coming from people who can&#039;t pay  let&#039;s reduce their burden. And no, there is no moral hazard here,  regardless of writers who dishonestly claim there is, the hazard exists in not helping people who are suffereing! We know what TBTF did - or have we conveniently forgotten about this? This blame the Gummint crap is expected from politicians, but G ain&#039;t no academic, and propaganda is useful in hiding the fact that these are captive elements.
Taboo, can&#039;t go there!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In fact, GM implied that principle reduction on unaffordable liars loans would be a &#8220;bailout for banks&#8221;. Why? If these losses are coming from people who can&#8217;t pay  let&#8217;s reduce their burden. And no, there is no moral hazard here,  regardless of writers who dishonestly claim there is, the hazard exists in not helping people who are suffereing! We know what TBTF did &#8211; or have we conveniently forgotten about this? This blame the Gummint crap is expected from politicians, but G ain&#8217;t no academic, and propaganda is useful in hiding the fact that these are captive elements.<br />
Taboo, can&#8217;t go there!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Sarah		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2012/12/03/in-an-f-h-a-checkup-a-startling-number/#comment-405560</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarah]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2012 01:41:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=55754#comment-405560</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[...which amounts to a Bank bailout, as it was with Fannie+Freddie. How about bailing out the affected homeowners or is housing really that low of a priority?  A principle reduction would save the taxpayers money, something Gretchen can&#039;t say, either she doesn&#039;t know or isn&#039;t permitted to say it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;which amounts to a Bank bailout, as it was with Fannie+Freddie. How about bailing out the affected homeowners or is housing really that low of a priority?  A principle reduction would save the taxpayers money, something Gretchen can&#8217;t say, either she doesn&#8217;t know or isn&#8217;t permitted to say it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
