Comments on: Daniel Fisher | Finding Little Evidence Of Foreclosure Fraud, Feds Give Up

By: Tricia

Tricia — Sun, 16 Feb 2014 23:53:06 +0000

I have been doing some research on Pearl M Burch, and found her in Monroe LA still living. http://www.whitepages.com/name/Pearl-M-Burch/Monroe-LA/2d0kjcc

By: shelleystotalbodyworks

shelleystotalbodyworks — Wed, 04 Sep 2013 18:47:45 +0000

In reply to Tricia.

I have docs with Pearl Burch on them. Email me at Shelleystotalbodyworks@comcast.net

By: Tricia

Tricia — Tue, 03 Sep 2013 00:33:10 +0000

In reply to Shelley Erickson. Does anyone have a document with Pearl M Burch and Angel Ruth Payne as the notary. I am trying to figure out how to prove Angel Ruth Payne is a robo-signer. If anyone has a link with her name on it showing she is a one, it would be greatly appreciated.

By: Shelley Erickson

Shelley Erickson — Wed, 05 Jun 2013 00:35:58 +0000

In reply to Glen. Pearl Burch is on pdf on my email i dont know how to send it anyway but that way and it is a doc of a close friend of mine that would like a copy of yours also to help her.

By: Shelley Erickson

Shelley Erickson — Wed, 05 Jun 2013 00:22:39 +0000

In reply to Glen.

I have a document with Pearl Burch and an obituary of her death two years before she signed this doc. Email me at Shelleystotalbodyworks@comcast.net

By: Glen

Glen — Tue, 04 Jun 2013 23:02:23 +0000

In reply to Danny Drain. Danny, I have a document with Pearl Burch, too. Contact me if you are interested.

By: Danny Drain

Danny Drain — Fri, 05 Apr 2013 02:38:13 +0000

In reply to Shelley Erickson. Can you contact me please regarding the Pearl M. Burch document?. Thanks.

By: Mark Clark

Mark Clark — Wed, 09 Jan 2013 23:29:21 +0000

Foreclosure cases in Florida are not tried before a jury for two reasons 1:) Florida law only allows foreclosure cases of equity to be tried by a judge. 2.) Most notes contain a waiver of trail by jury clause.

Beyond all of that, current case law has limited available affirmative defenses. By that I mean, all the bank has to do is to “allege” that they are the holder of the note. For a fixed fee a lawyer will draft fraudulent affidavits attesting that they hold the note. Unless you can prove that the note is not the original, by having a competent fraud examiner testify, then the bank’s allegation of “holder” of the note will stick. Judges really do not want to go beyond the legal theory of “holder” of the note in deciding cases. Sad but true. We need more appeals in order to create more case law.

By: Tim

Tim — Wed, 09 Jan 2013 04:47:12 +0000

In reply to Stan Galyean.

i feel your pain with the indymac stuff. im in same boat…..i decided to stop trying to reason with them because it was v clear to me they wanted my property. One Worst Bank threw all of Indymacs agreements out the window. I stopped paying and started saving…..have a top=notch lawyer……this is f war!

By: Stan Galyean

Stan Galyean — Wed, 09 Jan 2013 04:20:00 +0000

Now, you will have to take my word for it, my loan was preditory right from the start Loan originator: IndyMac. Took about two weeks to put the loan together in December of 2007. Signed on the 28th. Promised a 4.75% fixed 30yrs, at the closing table, it was about 8% five year arm. Called the lending agent from escrow to find out why the change. Said it was the best “they” could do right now but if I signed he guaranteed he would get me a better deal after the one year per pay ran out. Guess what? Market collapsed in 2008. IndyMac taken over by FDIC and sold to One West in March 2009. Called IndyMac Servicing in October and asked what kind of loan mod I could get.Guess what? We have nothing for you because you are current on your payments. We can help you unless you are 90 days behind in your payments! I think, that’s not hard to fix. don’t make my payments for 90 days. I get Notice of Default. I send a QWR to verify the debt and see who holds the note so I can negotiate with the proper party. Bullshit response with a bunch of computer run sheets with a loan number that doesn’t match my loan docs. Sent a lot of affidavits to a lot of people and got little or no response or a response that said they wouldn’t respond to my mailings. So, you see wee have IndyMac Federal bank foreclosing on my property. Assignment of Deed filed with county on 4/20/2009 by a Roger Stotts, VP of MERS assigning deed ti IndyMac, which was sold to One West on 3/19/2009. Bethany Hood signs a Substitution of Trustee on 4/20/2009 naming Northwest Trustee Services as new trustee. Bains v. MERS (WA) says MERS can’t legally assign anything. Who cares? Is it legal for an entity that does not exist to do anything legally? Is this what they call “Dead Corporation Walking.” Someone should make a movies of these zombie corporation walking through American cities destoying everything in their path. One things for sure, you can’t kill them. They only come back to life in a different form. Come to think of it, I probably have more of a chance being made right by selling the movie rights then winning in court! You would think this one would be a no brainer. Well look at the bright side for the bank (even if they were dead!), they got me to default on my payments for the 90 days so I’m sure they collected their default swips?Enough of this shit. I’m going to smoke some weed. I don’t smoke but its legal in Washington State now and I may have to start so I can forget why I’m wasting my time fighting this.