<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Fight Club Attorney George Attorney Babcock to Argue Defining Foreclosure Case in Front of Retired United States Supreme Court Justice	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://4closurefraud.org/2013/01/08/fight-club-attorney-george-attorney-babcock-to-argue-defining-foreclosure-case-in-front-of-retired-united-states-supreme-court-justice/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2013/01/08/fight-club-attorney-george-attorney-babcock-to-argue-defining-foreclosure-case-in-front-of-retired-united-states-supreme-court-justice/</link>
	<description>- Fighting Foreclosure Fraud BY SHARING THE KNOWLEDGE</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2025 19:26:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: trillionsofdollarsinfraud		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2013/01/08/fight-club-attorney-george-attorney-babcock-to-argue-defining-foreclosure-case-in-front-of-retired-united-states-supreme-court-justice/#comment-406676</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[trillionsofdollarsinfraud]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2013 16:20:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=56528#comment-406676</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Quote (&quot;MERS(the original mortgagee&quot;)) is not the mortgagee so this expert blows it write off the bat with this confusion about what MERS is as explained otherwise in the brief. For MERS to be the mortgagee, MERS would have to have been the original lender that loaned the principal.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quote (&#8220;MERS(the original mortgagee&#8221;)) is not the mortgagee so this expert blows it write off the bat with this confusion about what MERS is as explained otherwise in the brief. For MERS to be the mortgagee, MERS would have to have been the original lender that loaned the principal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: stripes		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2013/01/08/fight-club-attorney-george-attorney-babcock-to-argue-defining-foreclosure-case-in-front-of-retired-united-states-supreme-court-justice/#comment-406673</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[stripes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2013 15:32:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=56528#comment-406673</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It is all about the credit default swap insurance money for the FED shareholders (the banks) and their investors, the 4 large institutional investors controlled by the 8 largesse banking families. This was never about the money, this was about the theft of our property rights for these crooks. They forced default and told you to stop paying until the loan mod paperwork came in the mail. When you are in default for 2 months, they all collect the cds insurance money....both the shareholders of the banks and their investors were insured against the risk Wall Street was told to create by them. That one deception, telling you not to pay.. set the wheels of fraudclosure in motion, and proves deceit with intent to harm. This story also can be cooberated by millions of Americans. Their deceit was criminal, intentional  and is well documented.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is all about the credit default swap insurance money for the FED shareholders (the banks) and their investors, the 4 large institutional investors controlled by the 8 largesse banking families. This was never about the money, this was about the theft of our property rights for these crooks. They forced default and told you to stop paying until the loan mod paperwork came in the mail. When you are in default for 2 months, they all collect the cds insurance money&#8230;.both the shareholders of the banks and their investors were insured against the risk Wall Street was told to create by them. That one deception, telling you not to pay.. set the wheels of fraudclosure in motion, and proves deceit with intent to harm. This story also can be cooberated by millions of Americans. Their deceit was criminal, intentional  and is well documented.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
