<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Former Deutsche Bank Employee Claims Bank Took Big Libor Bets During Crisis Because It Could Influence Rates	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://4closurefraud.org/2013/01/10/former-deutsche-bank-employee-claims-bank-took-big-libor-bets-during-crisis-because-it-could-influence-rates/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2013/01/10/former-deutsche-bank-employee-claims-bank-took-big-libor-bets-during-crisis-because-it-could-influence-rates/</link>
	<description>- Fighting Foreclosure Fraud BY SHARING THE KNOWLEDGE</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 18:38:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: TheHutMaster		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2013/01/10/former-deutsche-bank-employee-claims-bank-took-big-libor-bets-during-crisis-because-it-could-influence-rates/#comment-406795</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TheHutMaster]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 18:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=56591#comment-406795</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Douche Bag Bank is getting away with unbelieavable crimes. Is it time for US to admin their demize? I sure do.

&quot;Fight the Good Fight&quot;
Every Minute, Every Day.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Douche Bag Bank is getting away with unbelieavable crimes. Is it time for US to admin their demize? I sure do.</p>
<p>&#8220;Fight the Good Fight&#8221;<br />
Every Minute, Every Day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: kate		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2013/01/10/former-deutsche-bank-employee-claims-bank-took-big-libor-bets-during-crisis-because-it-could-influence-rates/#comment-406767</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kate]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 01:00:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=56591#comment-406767</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Douche Bag (oops, Deutsche Bank) found &quot;mostly&quot; innocent.  Soooo does that mean &quot;somewhat&quot; guilty?  It is all too much to believe.  Money Laundering, fraud, forgery, money funneling to terrorists and drug cartels, theft, deceit, racketeering, unlawful foreclosures, robo-signing, bribes, rate steering, predatory lending, tax evasion, rate manipulation, false information to SEC, blatantly fraudulent appraisals, altering loan applications, perjury, alteration of legal documents just to name a few.  Yet we watch in horror and utter disbelief as our DOJ goes on TV and states they can&#039;t find any actual fraud or violations that break the law........SAY WHAT.  We have judges that won&#039;t even listen or let a homeowner speak based on just the fact of owing someone money so the laws that the servicers break don&#039;t count.....SAY WHAT.  Can these same justices answer me this one question which is:  a killer is arrested and brought to trial for murder.  Killer does not deny the murder and actually admits it.  There were 20 witnesses that saw the murder take place.  Problem - the suspect was not read his/her miranda rights when arrested.  This murder walks away based on a legal technicality.  When people are outraged by this, the defense legal eagles, judges and our justice system tell us this is how it must be to make sure a defendant gets due process and that our legal processes are followed to the letter of the law.  Fairness or lack thereof is not the issue. A judge should not be concerned with who does or does not get a free house or what is fair or not fair; the judge is there for one purpose and one purpose only...to see that the letter of the law is carried out.  It is all like something out of the twilight zone.  Just plain crazy.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Douche Bag (oops, Deutsche Bank) found &#8220;mostly&#8221; innocent.  Soooo does that mean &#8220;somewhat&#8221; guilty?  It is all too much to believe.  Money Laundering, fraud, forgery, money funneling to terrorists and drug cartels, theft, deceit, racketeering, unlawful foreclosures, robo-signing, bribes, rate steering, predatory lending, tax evasion, rate manipulation, false information to SEC, blatantly fraudulent appraisals, altering loan applications, perjury, alteration of legal documents just to name a few.  Yet we watch in horror and utter disbelief as our DOJ goes on TV and states they can&#8217;t find any actual fraud or violations that break the law&#8230;&#8230;..SAY WHAT.  We have judges that won&#8217;t even listen or let a homeowner speak based on just the fact of owing someone money so the laws that the servicers break don&#8217;t count&#8230;..SAY WHAT.  Can these same justices answer me this one question which is:  a killer is arrested and brought to trial for murder.  Killer does not deny the murder and actually admits it.  There were 20 witnesses that saw the murder take place.  Problem &#8211; the suspect was not read his/her miranda rights when arrested.  This murder walks away based on a legal technicality.  When people are outraged by this, the defense legal eagles, judges and our justice system tell us this is how it must be to make sure a defendant gets due process and that our legal processes are followed to the letter of the law.  Fairness or lack thereof is not the issue. A judge should not be concerned with who does or does not get a free house or what is fair or not fair; the judge is there for one purpose and one purpose only&#8230;to see that the letter of the law is carried out.  It is all like something out of the twilight zone.  Just plain crazy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
