<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: What We in the 1 Percent Don’t Want the 99 Percent To Know	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://4closurefraud.org/2013/01/15/what-we-in-the-1-percent-dont-want-the-99-percent-to-know/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2013/01/15/what-we-in-the-1-percent-dont-want-the-99-percent-to-know/</link>
	<description>- Fighting Foreclosure Fraud BY SHARING THE KNOWLEDGE</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2025 19:29:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Bobbi Swann		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2013/01/15/what-we-in-the-1-percent-dont-want-the-99-percent-to-know/#comment-407356</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bobbi Swann]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2013 05:26:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=56766#comment-407356</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[@ Pamela - it&#039;s not meant for us to understand but it&#039;s all mathematically based.  All in the numbers!  If you really read what is written you can see that there is not a lot of conjecture.  Think about one situation where we have such high unemployment.  An employer can now hire &quot;new&quot; employees at a much lower rate and at the same time use the leverage of unemployment to more or less threaten an existing employee to do more work, more responsibility and for the same pay or even lower pay just because of the threat of loss of their job and the &#039;belief&#039; conjured by the elitist that the probability of a new job is alost non-existant.  Now with Obamacare coming to fruition, employers are dropping full timers to part timers as a cost-saving means because they don&#039;t have to spend the (per full time employee) costs under Obamacare but in fact place that burden now on the shoulders of the (once) full timer now part timer.  They will hire more &quot;new&quot; employees at the part time rate and all the while it will be reported that new jobs have been created due to this increase in part time jobs.  The goods and services that are produced by that employer do not fall one iota....but the cost is reduced and therefore the profit margin is increased.  It is the standard of living for the 99% that will change; not the 1%.  Get it?????]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Pamela &#8211; it&#8217;s not meant for us to understand but it&#8217;s all mathematically based.  All in the numbers!  If you really read what is written you can see that there is not a lot of conjecture.  Think about one situation where we have such high unemployment.  An employer can now hire &#8220;new&#8221; employees at a much lower rate and at the same time use the leverage of unemployment to more or less threaten an existing employee to do more work, more responsibility and for the same pay or even lower pay just because of the threat of loss of their job and the &#8216;belief&#8217; conjured by the elitist that the probability of a new job is alost non-existant.  Now with Obamacare coming to fruition, employers are dropping full timers to part timers as a cost-saving means because they don&#8217;t have to spend the (per full time employee) costs under Obamacare but in fact place that burden now on the shoulders of the (once) full timer now part timer.  They will hire more &#8220;new&#8221; employees at the part time rate and all the while it will be reported that new jobs have been created due to this increase in part time jobs.  The goods and services that are produced by that employer do not fall one iota&#8230;.but the cost is reduced and therefore the profit margin is increased.  It is the standard of living for the 99% that will change; not the 1%.  Get it?????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Pamela Edwards		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2013/01/15/what-we-in-the-1-percent-dont-want-the-99-percent-to-know/#comment-406904</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pamela Edwards]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2013 13:17:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=56766#comment-406904</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[An interesting little ditty something we sub humans could not possibly understand.I mean Really?Seriously?What planet are these people from?Even Star Wars showed more imagination.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An interesting little ditty something we sub humans could not possibly understand.I mean Really?Seriously?What planet are these people from?Even Star Wars showed more imagination.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
