<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Why Did the OCC Let HSBC Off For $249 Million?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://4closurefraud.org/2013/01/19/why-did-the-occ-let-hsbc-off-for-249-million/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2013/01/19/why-did-the-occ-let-hsbc-off-for-249-million/</link>
	<description>- Fighting Foreclosure Fraud BY SHARING THE KNOWLEDGE</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2013 03:51:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: deanna1966		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2013/01/19/why-did-the-occ-let-hsbc-off-for-249-million/#comment-408695</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[deanna1966]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2013 03:51:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=56913#comment-408695</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[So lets say you are smarter than a 5th grader and know for a fact that your home was 1 of the millions that were transferred (or at least they attempted to make it look as though it was) into one of the trusts HSBC acted as trustee for, does the homeowner get to file some kind of claim for a portion of the settlement?  I am sure the answer is no!  So why call it a settlement?  Is the OCC acting as advocate for the homeowners? NO!  So what good has any of it done?  More importantly, when does the fraud stop?!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So lets say you are smarter than a 5th grader and know for a fact that your home was 1 of the millions that were transferred (or at least they attempted to make it look as though it was) into one of the trusts HSBC acted as trustee for, does the homeowner get to file some kind of claim for a portion of the settlement?  I am sure the answer is no!  So why call it a settlement?  Is the OCC acting as advocate for the homeowners? NO!  So what good has any of it done?  More importantly, when does the fraud stop?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: stripes		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2013/01/19/why-did-the-occ-let-hsbc-off-for-249-million/#comment-407129</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[stripes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2013 19:56:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=56913#comment-407129</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A check for a cool million to each American and clear title to every American would be justice. CNBC reported last week, these maniacs at the FED have stolen $60.4 dollars from us since 2008....It would have been cheaper to write 300 million checks....for a million to each American and give clear title to all than bailout these crooks. That proves this was all manufactured and about our robbery by this Foreign Corp AKA ....THE U.S. GOVERNMENT...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A check for a cool million to each American and clear title to every American would be justice. CNBC reported last week, these maniacs at the FED have stolen $60.4 dollars from us since 2008&#8230;.It would have been cheaper to write 300 million checks&#8230;.for a million to each American and give clear title to all than bailout these crooks. That proves this was all manufactured and about our robbery by this Foreign Corp AKA &#8230;.THE U.S. GOVERNMENT&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Beth A.		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2013/01/19/why-did-the-occ-let-hsbc-off-for-249-million/#comment-407123</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Beth A.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2013 17:13:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=56913#comment-407123</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[HSBC for JP Morgan Chase, as well.....amongst others.  Talk about a DEN O&#039; THIEVES!!!!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HSBC for JP Morgan Chase, as well&#8230;..amongst others.  Talk about a DEN O&#8217; THIEVES!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Tim Bryant (@trident90)		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2013/01/19/why-did-the-occ-let-hsbc-off-for-249-million/#comment-407069</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim Bryant (@trident90)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2013 06:41:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=56913#comment-407069</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The &quot;Independent&quot; Reviewer for HSBC was Ernst &#038; Young. Ernst &#038; Young is a registered lobbyist for HSBC....connect the dots !!!  

http://soprweb.senate.gov/index.cfm?event=getFilingDetails&#038;filingID=567AF796-8545-4F6E-9779-6E0474C853E4]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8220;Independent&#8221; Reviewer for HSBC was Ernst &amp; Young. Ernst &amp; Young is a registered lobbyist for HSBC&#8230;.connect the dots !!!  </p>
<p><a href="http://soprweb.senate.gov/index.cfm?event=getFilingDetails&#038;filingID=567AF796-8545-4F6E-9779-6E0474C853E4" rel="nofollow ugc">http://soprweb.senate.gov/index.cfm?event=getFilingDetails&#038;filingID=567AF796-8545-4F6E-9779-6E0474C853E4</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Sarah		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2013/01/19/why-did-the-occ-let-hsbc-off-for-249-million/#comment-407063</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarah]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2013 01:33:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=56913#comment-407063</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Why did the OCC wrist slap Capital One last summer for extensively ripping people (including servicemembers)?   The OCC employs the same people who are in the industry, and vice versa, they don&#039;t regulate - they accomodate.  HSBC epitomizes scandal and non-enforcement, you&#039;d think some careerist stiff at the OCC would be charged with looking for laundering, but to assume anything gets in the way of TBTF might be a mistake.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why did the OCC wrist slap Capital One last summer for extensively ripping people (including servicemembers)?   The OCC employs the same people who are in the industry, and vice versa, they don&#8217;t regulate &#8211; they accomodate.  HSBC epitomizes scandal and non-enforcement, you&#8217;d think some careerist stiff at the OCC would be charged with looking for laundering, but to assume anything gets in the way of TBTF might be a mistake.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: bobbi swann		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2013/01/19/why-did-the-occ-let-hsbc-off-for-249-million/#comment-407062</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bobbi swann]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2013 01:27:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=56913#comment-407062</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Obviously the OCC has full knowledge of this fraud otherwise why attempt to be &#039;consistant&#039; with all the other banksters.  So tell me where is this $249 Mil going?  Any accountability for this or are we going to send it off to the various states and let them pair it up with their defunct county, city and state budgets?  Where&#039;s the lion share of this going?  To the OCC?  Who suffers the consequences of HSBC&#039;s actions?  Surely not the OCC.  Oh, but yeah, I nearly forgot - it was those deadbeat homeowners who got in way over their head and spent far too much in excess of incoming funds!  Wow!  Does not our present government been doing the same damn thing for the last 4+ years?  OH!  Again, I keep forgetting - Obama is going to get another &quot;chance&quot; at &quot;change&quot;.  Well, he already started.  He changed his presidential portrait from last year with a little bit more of a smile.  I just wonder what brought on the &#039;change&#039; in his smile?  Maybe because he now knows he has 4 more years to screw the citizens.  Aren&#039;t you tired of footing the bills?  (you deadbeats, you!)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obviously the OCC has full knowledge of this fraud otherwise why attempt to be &#8216;consistant&#8217; with all the other banksters.  So tell me where is this $249 Mil going?  Any accountability for this or are we going to send it off to the various states and let them pair it up with their defunct county, city and state budgets?  Where&#8217;s the lion share of this going?  To the OCC?  Who suffers the consequences of HSBC&#8217;s actions?  Surely not the OCC.  Oh, but yeah, I nearly forgot &#8211; it was those deadbeat homeowners who got in way over their head and spent far too much in excess of incoming funds!  Wow!  Does not our present government been doing the same damn thing for the last 4+ years?  OH!  Again, I keep forgetting &#8211; Obama is going to get another &#8220;chance&#8221; at &#8220;change&#8221;.  Well, he already started.  He changed his presidential portrait from last year with a little bit more of a smile.  I just wonder what brought on the &#8216;change&#8217; in his smile?  Maybe because he now knows he has 4 more years to screw the citizens.  Aren&#8217;t you tired of footing the bills?  (you deadbeats, you!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: usedkarguy		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2013/01/19/why-did-the-occ-let-hsbc-off-for-249-million/#comment-407052</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[usedkarguy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2013 16:46:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=56913#comment-407052</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[HSBC also serves as trustee for most Wells Fargo private label securitizations as well.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HSBC also serves as trustee for most Wells Fargo private label securitizations as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
