<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Bank of America v. Casey: Paragraph 22 of Mortgage &#8211; Substantial Compliance Rejected, “Bring a court action” Language Does Not Substantially Comply	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://4closurefraud.org/2013/01/24/bank-of-america-v-casey-paragraph-22-of-mortgage-substantial-compliance-rejected-bring-a-court-action-language-does-not-substantially-comply/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2013/01/24/bank-of-america-v-casey-paragraph-22-of-mortgage-substantial-compliance-rejected-bring-a-court-action-language-does-not-substantially-comply/</link>
	<description>- Fighting Foreclosure Fraud BY SHARING THE KNOWLEDGE</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2025 18:20:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.7</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: sam		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2013/01/24/bank-of-america-v-casey-paragraph-22-of-mortgage-substantial-compliance-rejected-bring-a-court-action-language-does-not-substantially-comply/#comment-407263</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sam]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 00:03:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=57090#comment-407263</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[let&#039;s us know when you get a decision from one of the Appeals courts!!!!!!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>let&#8217;s us know when you get a decision from one of the Appeals courts!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
