https://4closurefraud.org/2013/02/16/the-first-circuit-strikes-again-in-culhane-v-aurora-servicing-grants-borrowers-legal-standing-to-challenge-mortgage-assignments-but-upholds-mers-system/ - Fighting Foreclosure Fraud BY SHARING THE KNOWLEDGE Mon, 08 Dec 2025 14:32:32 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.2 https://4closurefraud.org/2013/02/16/the-first-circuit-strikes-again-in-culhane-v-aurora-servicing-grants-borrowers-legal-standing-to-challenge-mortgage-assignments-but-upholds-mers-system/#comment-408171 Sun, 17 Feb 2013 16:16:49 +0000 https://4closurefraud.org/?p=57845#comment-408171 Does Bain and Culhane set up the situation we need for the U.S. SCt to decide Carpenter v. Longan in light of these cases????? Does Culhane set aside Carpenter v. Longan? Does Bain uphold Carpnetere v Longan?

]]> https://4closurefraud.org/2013/02/16/the-first-circuit-strikes-again-in-culhane-v-aurora-servicing-grants-borrowers-legal-standing-to-challenge-mortgage-assignments-but-upholds-mers-system/#comment-408159 Sun, 17 Feb 2013 04:03:52 +0000 https://4closurefraud.org/?p=57845#comment-408159 Perhaps the three judges should read this article!
http://deadlyclear.wordpress.com/2013/02/16/the-3-stooges-of-mers-disorder-in-the-court/#more-3402

]]> https://4closurefraud.org/2013/02/16/the-first-circuit-strikes-again-in-culhane-v-aurora-servicing-grants-borrowers-legal-standing-to-challenge-mortgage-assignments-but-upholds-mers-system/#comment-408138 Sat, 16 Feb 2013 22:19:22 +0000 https://4closurefraud.org/?p=57845#comment-408138 The Carpenter V Longan 1872, U.S. Supreme Court decision is standing case law that the note and the deed of trust can not be separated. WA Supreme Court Bains V MERS is pursuasive casel law in other states. For the law to allow the note to be separated from each other is like Soloman tring to decide who really was the mother of the child and slpitting the child in half for each mother. In the state of Washington MERS did not go through policy channelsby policy makers to legally be able to privately record the land records. It is the law of the state of Wa for ;and records to be filed.It appears MERS and the banks that put MERS together made their own policy law and they are not policy makers. Purhaps polcy buyer but not makers. It is the law to file land records in this state? Or does this state allow any entity to set the laws in place without policy makers. And have the policy enforcers judges now become policy makers like kings on thrones using their case law for policy and ignor policy maker statutes? If statutes call for recording land title then would MERS be legal if MERS does not record the titlle and assignments? And if there is law to record the land titles is MERS a rouge law maker making policy makers law lawless?

]]>