<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Serrano v. HSBC &#124; FL 4th DCA – Summary Judgment REVERSED: Dispute Related to Paragraph 22 Condition Precedent to Foreclosure	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://4closurefraud.org/2013/02/23/serrano-v-hsbc-fl-4th-dca-summary-judgment-reversed-dispute-related-to-paragraph-22-condition-precedent-to-foreclosure/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2013/02/23/serrano-v-hsbc-fl-4th-dca-summary-judgment-reversed-dispute-related-to-paragraph-22-condition-precedent-to-foreclosure/</link>
	<description>- Fighting Foreclosure Fraud BY SHARING THE KNOWLEDGE</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2013 19:39:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.6</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Shelley Erickson		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2013/02/23/serrano-v-hsbc-fl-4th-dca-summary-judgment-reversed-dispute-related-to-paragraph-22-condition-precedent-to-foreclosure/#comment-408362</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shelley Erickson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2013 19:39:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=58013#comment-408362</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This witness states they sometimes endorse copies (screen shots) of notes. And he testifies the court can rely on their screen shots of being true copies of the originals. However obviously they are not. and he never produced thier original notes.  
http://stopforeclosurefraud.com/2013/02/24/kaboom-mcdonald-v-onewest-evidentiary-hearing-we-have-discovered-today-that-there-are-two-versions-of-the-original-note-are-you-now-aware-of-that/]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This witness states they sometimes endorse copies (screen shots) of notes. And he testifies the court can rely on their screen shots of being true copies of the originals. However obviously they are not. and he never produced thier original notes.<br />
<a href="http://stopforeclosurefraud.com/2013/02/24/kaboom-mcdonald-v-onewest-evidentiary-hearing-we-have-discovered-today-that-there-are-two-versions-of-the-original-note-are-you-now-aware-of-that/" rel="nofollow ugc">http://stopforeclosurefraud.com/2013/02/24/kaboom-mcdonald-v-onewest-evidentiary-hearing-we-have-discovered-today-that-there-are-two-versions-of-the-original-note-are-you-now-aware-of-that/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Herman Vergara		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2013/02/23/serrano-v-hsbc-fl-4th-dca-summary-judgment-reversed-dispute-related-to-paragraph-22-condition-precedent-to-foreclosure/#comment-408335</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Herman Vergara]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2013 16:36:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=58013#comment-408335</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[*FANTASTIC*. If you go to: www.RollingStone.com/ And on the right side of the RED LETTERS, with the title RollingStone, you write: *HSBC*, you will find information about the dirty business of HSBC Bank.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*FANTASTIC*. If you go to: <a href="http://www.RollingStone.com/" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.RollingStone.com/</a> And on the right side of the RED LETTERS, with the title RollingStone, you write: *HSBC*, you will find information about the dirty business of HSBC Bank.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
