<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Verification of Foreclosure Complaint: Is a Foreclosure Plaintiff “likely” to prevail merely by filing suit?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://4closurefraud.org/2013/03/14/verification-of-foreclosure-complaint-is-a-foreclosure-plaintiff-likely-to-prevail-merely-by-filing-suit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2013/03/14/verification-of-foreclosure-complaint-is-a-foreclosure-plaintiff-likely-to-prevail-merely-by-filing-suit/</link>
	<description>- Fighting Foreclosure Fraud BY SHARING THE KNOWLEDGE</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2025 13:23:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Hillary		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2013/03/14/verification-of-foreclosure-complaint-is-a-foreclosure-plaintiff-likely-to-prevail-merely-by-filing-suit/#comment-417563</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hillary]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jul 2013 18:38:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=58244#comment-417563</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I really didn&#039; t know that a corporation could give POA.  I though they had to file an amendment.  A person can give POA, but not a corporation.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really didn&#8217; t know that a corporation could give POA.  I though they had to file an amendment.  A person can give POA, but not a corporation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: BOBBI SWANN		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2013/03/14/verification-of-foreclosure-complaint-is-a-foreclosure-plaintiff-likely-to-prevail-merely-by-filing-suit/#comment-411428</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[BOBBI SWANN]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 17:16:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=58244#comment-411428</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://4closurefraud.org/2013/03/14/verification-of-foreclosure-complaint-is-a-foreclosure-plaintiff-likely-to-prevail-merely-by-filing-suit/#comment-411426&quot;&gt;robert wade&lt;/a&gt;.

Amen to Robert Wade! (You do have an industrial dust pan, right?)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://4closurefraud.org/2013/03/14/verification-of-foreclosure-complaint-is-a-foreclosure-plaintiff-likely-to-prevail-merely-by-filing-suit/#comment-411426">robert wade</a>.</p>
<p>Amen to Robert Wade! (You do have an industrial dust pan, right?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: robert wade		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2013/03/14/verification-of-foreclosure-complaint-is-a-foreclosure-plaintiff-likely-to-prevail-merely-by-filing-suit/#comment-411426</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[robert wade]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 16:53:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=58244#comment-411426</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://4closurefraud.org/2013/03/14/verification-of-foreclosure-complaint-is-a-foreclosure-plaintiff-likely-to-prevail-merely-by-filing-suit/#comment-408891&quot;&gt;Bobbi Swann&lt;/a&gt;.

you keep sweeping and I&#039;ll hold the dust pan and maybe, maybe just maybe the clean up job will be accomplished. Robert Wade Pro Se Litigant.....................]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://4closurefraud.org/2013/03/14/verification-of-foreclosure-complaint-is-a-foreclosure-plaintiff-likely-to-prevail-merely-by-filing-suit/#comment-408891">Bobbi Swann</a>.</p>
<p>you keep sweeping and I&#8217;ll hold the dust pan and maybe, maybe just maybe the clean up job will be accomplished. Robert Wade Pro Se Litigant&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mike Drouin		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2013/03/14/verification-of-foreclosure-complaint-is-a-foreclosure-plaintiff-likely-to-prevail-merely-by-filing-suit/#comment-409063</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike Drouin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2013 16:59:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=58244#comment-409063</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m in Federal Court  ,District of NH and I &#039;m being  &quot; Railroaded !! &quot; I have complaints into the Justice Department and have paid nearly thirty grand in Lawyer&#039;s fees . I asked my Lawyer to withdraw because he wanted us to concede when I&#039;m being told by a forensic Foreclosure expert that they are using documents ( PSA ) that are fraudulent in nature , and thats beside the assignment of mortgage by Sand Canyon that was recorded in the land record that violates the PSA  !?!? I even had a buyer for my house two years ago and because of the assignment of mortgage being slanderous to the Title of our home , I couldn&#039;t sell the house !?!? I even have a signed and notorized statement from the buyer . I hope all the facts come out on this one , it will definetly make you shake your head and disgust you.......]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m in Federal Court  ,District of NH and I &#8216;m being  &#8221; Railroaded !! &#8221; I have complaints into the Justice Department and have paid nearly thirty grand in Lawyer&#8217;s fees . I asked my Lawyer to withdraw because he wanted us to concede when I&#8217;m being told by a forensic Foreclosure expert that they are using documents ( PSA ) that are fraudulent in nature , and thats beside the assignment of mortgage by Sand Canyon that was recorded in the land record that violates the PSA  !?!? I even had a buyer for my house two years ago and because of the assignment of mortgage being slanderous to the Title of our home , I couldn&#8217;t sell the house !?!? I even have a signed and notorized statement from the buyer . I hope all the facts come out on this one , it will definetly make you shake your head and disgust you&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: BOBBI SWANN		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2013/03/14/verification-of-foreclosure-complaint-is-a-foreclosure-plaintiff-likely-to-prevail-merely-by-filing-suit/#comment-408918</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[BOBBI SWANN]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 14:28:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=58244#comment-408918</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://4closurefraud.org/2013/03/14/verification-of-foreclosure-complaint-is-a-foreclosure-plaintiff-likely-to-prevail-merely-by-filing-suit/#comment-408912&quot;&gt;vince faulkner&lt;/a&gt;.

The Attorney Registration &#038; Disciplinary Commission (www.iardc.org) lists President Obama&#039;s registration status as &quot;voluntarily retired.&quot; It lists Michelle Obama&#039;s status as &quot;voluntarily inactive.&quot; @ Vince Faulkner can spin the word &quot;voluntarily&quot; as much as you want.  For an annual fee of less than $300 to keep the license(s) active ???.....some electric bills are more than that.  As far as snopes, fastcheck, etc. I personally don&#039;t trust any of them.  And if you think that conspiracies or ponzi schemes don&#039;t exist, why do you post on this site?  Enough of this discussion &#038; waste of my time on Obama.  He&#039;s on his last term and that&#039;s my only consolation.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://4closurefraud.org/2013/03/14/verification-of-foreclosure-complaint-is-a-foreclosure-plaintiff-likely-to-prevail-merely-by-filing-suit/#comment-408912">vince faulkner</a>.</p>
<p>The Attorney Registration &amp; Disciplinary Commission (www.iardc.org) lists President Obama&#8217;s registration status as &#8220;voluntarily retired.&#8221; It lists Michelle Obama&#8217;s status as &#8220;voluntarily inactive.&#8221; @ Vince Faulkner can spin the word &#8220;voluntarily&#8221; as much as you want.  For an annual fee of less than $300 to keep the license(s) active ???&#8230;..some electric bills are more than that.  As far as snopes, fastcheck, etc. I personally don&#8217;t trust any of them.  And if you think that conspiracies or ponzi schemes don&#8217;t exist, why do you post on this site?  Enough of this discussion &amp; waste of my time on Obama.  He&#8217;s on his last term and that&#8217;s my only consolation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: vince faulkner		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2013/03/14/verification-of-foreclosure-complaint-is-a-foreclosure-plaintiff-likely-to-prevail-merely-by-filing-suit/#comment-408912</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[vince faulkner]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 12:47:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=58244#comment-408912</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://4closurefraud.org/2013/03/14/verification-of-foreclosure-complaint-is-a-foreclosure-plaintiff-likely-to-prevail-merely-by-filing-suit/#comment-408891&quot;&gt;Bobbi Swann&lt;/a&gt;.

Your statement about both the President and First Lady losing their license to practice law is incorrect and irresponsible. Please check the facts before making claims.
factcheck.org/2012/06/the-obamas-law-licenses/]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://4closurefraud.org/2013/03/14/verification-of-foreclosure-complaint-is-a-foreclosure-plaintiff-likely-to-prevail-merely-by-filing-suit/#comment-408891">Bobbi Swann</a>.</p>
<p>Your statement about both the President and First Lady losing their license to practice law is incorrect and irresponsible. Please check the facts before making claims.<br />
factcheck.org/2012/06/the-obamas-law-licenses/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: robert wade		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2013/03/14/verification-of-foreclosure-complaint-is-a-foreclosure-plaintiff-likely-to-prevail-merely-by-filing-suit/#comment-408898</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[robert wade]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 23:51:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=58244#comment-408898</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[it seems that the proper paper must be prior to a foreclousure. The filiing of a suit must be before the foreclosure begins if a 3rd party is involved (usually does) to hold up the standing in court to foreclosing on home PSA to have validity.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it seems that the proper paper must be prior to a foreclousure. The filiing of a suit must be before the foreclosure begins if a 3rd party is involved (usually does) to hold up the standing in court to foreclosing on home PSA to have validity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Emilia Fariday		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2013/03/14/verification-of-foreclosure-complaint-is-a-foreclosure-plaintiff-likely-to-prevail-merely-by-filing-suit/#comment-408894</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Emilia Fariday]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 18:03:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=58244#comment-408894</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The true issue is a lack of knowledge.  You can claim your own property bu acknolwledging your deed sitting in a file somewhere collecting dust.  You will bypass FRAUDULENT mortgages and land taxes and become the true owner of the property. Stop pointing the finger about who is supposed to do what for you, when you do it yourself, you will find that y ou yeild the power to stop the entire system.  ACKNOWLEDGE is one letter away from LACKNOWLEDGE.  And you currently lack.  Get in on the &quot; ACKNOWLEDGE YOUR DEED&quot; game and stop the siezures.  If you have a mortgage you are a TENANT.  Wake up folks, the shit is in plain sight!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The true issue is a lack of knowledge.  You can claim your own property bu acknolwledging your deed sitting in a file somewhere collecting dust.  You will bypass FRAUDULENT mortgages and land taxes and become the true owner of the property. Stop pointing the finger about who is supposed to do what for you, when you do it yourself, you will find that y ou yeild the power to stop the entire system.  ACKNOWLEDGE is one letter away from LACKNOWLEDGE.  And you currently lack.  Get in on the &#8221; ACKNOWLEDGE YOUR DEED&#8221; game and stop the siezures.  If you have a mortgage you are a TENANT.  Wake up folks, the shit is in plain sight!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: bobbi swann		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2013/03/14/verification-of-foreclosure-complaint-is-a-foreclosure-plaintiff-likely-to-prevail-merely-by-filing-suit/#comment-408893</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bobbi swann]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 17:32:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=58244#comment-408893</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[My name is not Hey Honey.  It&#039;s Bobbi Swann and I am not afraid of disclosing my name on any site!  As far as &#039;intact&#039; so I added a space!  Editing my posting does not change the facts, NO NAME.  And if you read the comments from the entire post you would be able to define and relate on what I was posting in reference.  It sometimes pays to read.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My name is not Hey Honey.  It&#8217;s Bobbi Swann and I am not afraid of disclosing my name on any site!  As far as &#8216;intact&#8217; so I added a space!  Editing my posting does not change the facts, NO NAME.  And if you read the comments from the entire post you would be able to define and relate on what I was posting in reference.  It sometimes pays to read.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: no names, please		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2013/03/14/verification-of-foreclosure-complaint-is-a-foreclosure-plaintiff-likely-to-prevail-merely-by-filing-suit/#comment-408892</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[no names, please]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 16:08:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=58244#comment-408892</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://4closurefraud.org/2013/03/14/verification-of-foreclosure-complaint-is-a-foreclosure-plaintiff-likely-to-prevail-merely-by-filing-suit/#comment-408891&quot;&gt;Bobbi Swann&lt;/a&gt;.

Hey, honey, you don&#039;t even know how to spell intact or know that the plural of homeowners doesn&#039;t have an apostrophe, so why should we believe anything YOU say.  
This is a bi-partisan situation; this is bi-partisan fraud.  
All I know is that if this is bad, REPUBLICAN rule would have been WORSE.  And, it&#039;s pretty damn bad.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://4closurefraud.org/2013/03/14/verification-of-foreclosure-complaint-is-a-foreclosure-plaintiff-likely-to-prevail-merely-by-filing-suit/#comment-408891">Bobbi Swann</a>.</p>
<p>Hey, honey, you don&#8217;t even know how to spell intact or know that the plural of homeowners doesn&#8217;t have an apostrophe, so why should we believe anything YOU say.<br />
This is a bi-partisan situation; this is bi-partisan fraud.<br />
All I know is that if this is bad, REPUBLICAN rule would have been WORSE.  And, it&#8217;s pretty damn bad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
