<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Rule 1.110(b): Can Anyone Verify a Foreclosure Complaint?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://4closurefraud.org/2013/04/10/rule-1-110b-can-anyone-verify-a-foreclosure-complaint/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2013/04/10/rule-1-110b-can-anyone-verify-a-foreclosure-complaint/</link>
	<description>- Fighting Foreclosure Fraud BY SHARING THE KNOWLEDGE</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2025 14:56:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: solutions		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2013/04/10/rule-1-110b-can-anyone-verify-a-foreclosure-complaint/#comment-409727</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[solutions]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 20:01:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=58789#comment-409727</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://4closurefraud.org/2013/04/10/rule-1-110b-can-anyone-verify-a-foreclosure-complaint/#comment-409694&quot;&gt;BOBBI SWANN&lt;/a&gt;.

How about an attorney represent the pro se litigant on a Motion for Rehearing and/or...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://4closurefraud.org/2013/04/10/rule-1-110b-can-anyone-verify-a-foreclosure-complaint/#comment-409694">BOBBI SWANN</a>.</p>
<p>How about an attorney represent the pro se litigant on a Motion for Rehearing and/or&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: BOBBI SWANN		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2013/04/10/rule-1-110b-can-anyone-verify-a-foreclosure-complaint/#comment-409694</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[BOBBI SWANN]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 14:15:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=58789#comment-409694</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[@Mark Stopa - Certainly this is a joke?  If that is the case, then robosigning is all but accepted by a Court (not that it isn&#039;t already) but then there would be no challenging it further.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Mark Stopa &#8211; Certainly this is a joke?  If that is the case, then robosigning is all but accepted by a Court (not that it isn&#8217;t already) but then there would be no challenging it further.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
