<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: BAR FIGHT!!! Rare Dispute Within Florida Bar Over Quickie Foreclosure Bills Heats Up	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://4closurefraud.org/2013/04/12/bar-fight-rare-dispute-within-florida-bar-over-quickie-foreclosure-bills-heats-up/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2013/04/12/bar-fight-rare-dispute-within-florida-bar-over-quickie-foreclosure-bills-heats-up/</link>
	<description>- Fighting Foreclosure Fraud BY SHARING THE KNOWLEDGE</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2025 14:57:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: PJ		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2013/04/12/bar-fight-rare-dispute-within-florida-bar-over-quickie-foreclosure-bills-heats-up/#comment-410034</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[PJ]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2013 21:42:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=58861#comment-410034</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Though each foreclosure case may be slightly different, most are pretty black and white. A contract is entered into and the terms are either upheld or they’re not. The lender either abides by contract, real estate, consumer protection, and securities laws, or it does not; and the loan is either paid timely or its not.

Instead of burdening the court system with millions of foreclosure cases, why not create ATMs for justice?  They could be called AJMs.  Feed all real estate, UCC and consumer protection laws into a computer program (not court decisions–I’m not fond of judges writing laws), making sure that all laws comport themselves with the US Constitution. 

Require that those who want to challenge a foreclosure get a forensic audit of their loan and its path, mindful that this would not be necessary if transparency were available, as it was when proper records were recorded in the county where the property is located.

Feed the particulars into the computer program. Let the program decide whether the title is clouded, whether securitization and/or bifurcation have taken place, whether proper and timely assignments have been attested to and recorded, whether the consumer protection and contract laws have been followed, whether the loan has been paid (sometimes many times over), the bank or servicer instituting the foreclosure action has standing to do so. Let the program decide on damages relative to the extent of the bankers’ malfeasance. Currently, the law allows for a “free” home, plus treble damages, plus attorney fees and costs.

Such an impartial computer program would take pressure off those overworked, and dare I say compromised, judges.

It would be technology put to its highest use.This sort of computer application would also work well with discovering fraud in foreclosure actions that have already taken place.

Further, another like application could be written for Title 26, subsection A, income tax, considering that the liability for income tax is rather limited to say the least.  

Of course, these computer programs would be moot if money, or actually, federal reserve notes (notes are debt instruments) were simply eradicated, which is probably the best idea of all. Eliminating federal reserve notes entirely would certainly pull the rug out from under those who have been in control.

For more on that, see http://www.gaiamtv.com/video/michael-tellinger-utopia]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Though each foreclosure case may be slightly different, most are pretty black and white. A contract is entered into and the terms are either upheld or they’re not. The lender either abides by contract, real estate, consumer protection, and securities laws, or it does not; and the loan is either paid timely or its not.</p>
<p>Instead of burdening the court system with millions of foreclosure cases, why not create ATMs for justice?  They could be called AJMs.  Feed all real estate, UCC and consumer protection laws into a computer program (not court decisions–I’m not fond of judges writing laws), making sure that all laws comport themselves with the US Constitution. </p>
<p>Require that those who want to challenge a foreclosure get a forensic audit of their loan and its path, mindful that this would not be necessary if transparency were available, as it was when proper records were recorded in the county where the property is located.</p>
<p>Feed the particulars into the computer program. Let the program decide whether the title is clouded, whether securitization and/or bifurcation have taken place, whether proper and timely assignments have been attested to and recorded, whether the consumer protection and contract laws have been followed, whether the loan has been paid (sometimes many times over), the bank or servicer instituting the foreclosure action has standing to do so. Let the program decide on damages relative to the extent of the bankers’ malfeasance. Currently, the law allows for a “free” home, plus treble damages, plus attorney fees and costs.</p>
<p>Such an impartial computer program would take pressure off those overworked, and dare I say compromised, judges.</p>
<p>It would be technology put to its highest use.This sort of computer application would also work well with discovering fraud in foreclosure actions that have already taken place.</p>
<p>Further, another like application could be written for Title 26, subsection A, income tax, considering that the liability for income tax is rather limited to say the least.  </p>
<p>Of course, these computer programs would be moot if money, or actually, federal reserve notes (notes are debt instruments) were simply eradicated, which is probably the best idea of all. Eliminating federal reserve notes entirely would certainly pull the rug out from under those who have been in control.</p>
<p>For more on that, see <a href="http://www.gaiamtv.com/video/michael-tellinger-utopia" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.gaiamtv.com/video/michael-tellinger-utopia</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: J. Alonzo		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2013/04/12/bar-fight-rare-dispute-within-florida-bar-over-quickie-foreclosure-bills-heats-up/#comment-409902</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[J. Alonzo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Apr 2013 14:57:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=58861#comment-409902</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This is just the start. This bill will not pass this time because its just to out there, but in time it will look normal and ok. They will surely but slowly get everyone use to the ideas these changes. Laws that are made for the sheeple to loose their rights. We already have corrupt judges in our state courts that dont even want to hear defense attorneys for foreclosures. Rather they ignore them and side with the banksters. These judges are criminals who work for the banks and the 
elite that own us. Their are still a few who still follow the law. Very Few! This will surely change as  time goes by for the worst.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is just the start. This bill will not pass this time because its just to out there, but in time it will look normal and ok. They will surely but slowly get everyone use to the ideas these changes. Laws that are made for the sheeple to loose their rights. We already have corrupt judges in our state courts that dont even want to hear defense attorneys for foreclosures. Rather they ignore them and side with the banksters. These judges are criminals who work for the banks and the<br />
elite that own us. Their are still a few who still follow the law. Very Few! This will surely change as  time goes by for the worst.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: neidermeyer		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2013/04/12/bar-fight-rare-dispute-within-florida-bar-over-quickie-foreclosure-bills-heats-up/#comment-409901</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[neidermeyer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Apr 2013 14:29:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=58861#comment-409901</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://4closurefraud.org/2013/04/12/bar-fight-rare-dispute-within-florida-bar-over-quickie-foreclosure-bills-heats-up/#comment-409876&quot;&gt;triumphant&lt;/a&gt;.

Triumphant , 

You know very well that the bar has only the purest intentions and is working for the greater profits of all lawyers ... the bill will fail not because it is illegal and immoral but because by giving the banks all the ammunition it will REDUCE the money received by the bars members when people and banks no longer have an incentive to hire lawyers to fight for or against what will become a pre-ordained outcome.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://4closurefraud.org/2013/04/12/bar-fight-rare-dispute-within-florida-bar-over-quickie-foreclosure-bills-heats-up/#comment-409876">triumphant</a>.</p>
<p>Triumphant , </p>
<p>You know very well that the bar has only the purest intentions and is working for the greater profits of all lawyers &#8230; the bill will fail not because it is illegal and immoral but because by giving the banks all the ammunition it will REDUCE the money received by the bars members when people and banks no longer have an incentive to hire lawyers to fight for or against what will become a pre-ordained outcome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: pat farrell		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2013/04/12/bar-fight-rare-dispute-within-florida-bar-over-quickie-foreclosure-bills-heats-up/#comment-409881</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[pat farrell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Apr 2013 01:17:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=58861#comment-409881</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT-MIDDLE DISTRICT-FORT MYERS DIVISION

PATRICK LORNE FARRELL©,Plaintiff,	vs.STATE OF FLORIDA REPUBLICANSRICK SCOTT, PAM BONDI;JOHN STUMPF, BRIAN MOYNIHAN,THOMAS MARANO,COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS,COUNTRYWIDE FINANCIAL,RICHARD JOHNSON,JOSEPH TOMKINSON,WILLIAM ERBEY, OCWEN LOAN SERVICING,BANK OF AMERICA,IMPAC SECURED ASSETS,IMPAC FUNDING CORP.,GMACM, WELLS FARGO BANK,LEE COUNTY SHERIFF,STATE ATTORNEY and CIRCUITJUDGES OF THE 20TH CIRCUIT,Defendants	CASE NO. 2:13-cv-140-FTm-29DNF
COMPLAINT FOR FRAUD,QUI TAM, QUIET TITLE AND SUBSEQUENT DAMAGES
1.	SUMMARILY, Plaintiff PATRICK FARRELL a Democrat, states defendant [SOF] STATE OF FLORIDA REPUBLICANS falsely arrested and maliciously prosecuted him [case 94-2430CF] for 3 felonies, to “make money” by a fraudulent PROBABLE CA-- USE AFFIDAVIT, made by the Lee Co. Sheriff, who procured an Arrest Warrant, which caused the 20th Circuit STATE ATTORNEY to fabricate a criminal charge, stealing $20,000 from Plaintiff, under color of law. 
2.	S.O.F. took bribes and statements from ISKCON child molesters, who had IRS 501C3 status. 
3.	SECONDLY, Plaintiff filed case 07-CA-14942, a case of Mortgage Fraud into the [R] 20th Circuit, against [R] parties of the MBS; IMPAC SECURED ASSETS-2005-2, who also had bogus IRS tax exempt status, only to have the Republican judges refuse to grant Plaintiff relief of any kind, despite Federal Court Orders to do so, and allow WELLS FARGO to file case 07-CA-16767, based upon a false AFFIDAVIT, and sustain said case, based entirely on false pretenses.
4.	All [R] lawyers and judges are merely Corporate Franchise Court, Revenue Collection Agents, working for the REPUBLICAN C.E.O.’s  JOHN STUMPF-WFB; THOMAS MARANO-GMACM BRIAN MOYNIHAN- B.O.A., who are agencies of the private FEDERAL RESERVE BANK.
5.	In both and all cases, [R] lawyers and judges violate the UCC, Constitution and statutes to facilitate the taking of equity, property, credit and money by bias, prejudice and phony AFFIDAVITS.
ALL YOU SHEEP NEED TO RECLAIM YOUR SOVEREIGNTY AND DESTROY THE THIEVES]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT-MIDDLE DISTRICT-FORT MYERS DIVISION</p>
<p>PATRICK LORNE FARRELL©,Plaintiff,	vs.STATE OF FLORIDA REPUBLICANSRICK SCOTT, PAM BONDI;JOHN STUMPF, BRIAN MOYNIHAN,THOMAS MARANO,COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS,COUNTRYWIDE FINANCIAL,RICHARD JOHNSON,JOSEPH TOMKINSON,WILLIAM ERBEY, OCWEN LOAN SERVICING,BANK OF AMERICA,IMPAC SECURED ASSETS,IMPAC FUNDING CORP.,GMACM, WELLS FARGO BANK,LEE COUNTY SHERIFF,STATE ATTORNEY and CIRCUITJUDGES OF THE 20TH CIRCUIT,Defendants	CASE NO. 2:13-cv-140-FTm-29DNF<br />
COMPLAINT FOR FRAUD,QUI TAM, QUIET TITLE AND SUBSEQUENT DAMAGES<br />
1.	SUMMARILY, Plaintiff PATRICK FARRELL a Democrat, states defendant [SOF] STATE OF FLORIDA REPUBLICANS falsely arrested and maliciously prosecuted him [case 94-2430CF] for 3 felonies, to “make money” by a fraudulent PROBABLE CA&#8211; USE AFFIDAVIT, made by the Lee Co. Sheriff, who procured an Arrest Warrant, which caused the 20th Circuit STATE ATTORNEY to fabricate a criminal charge, stealing $20,000 from Plaintiff, under color of law.<br />
2.	S.O.F. took bribes and statements from ISKCON child molesters, who had IRS 501C3 status.<br />
3.	SECONDLY, Plaintiff filed case 07-CA-14942, a case of Mortgage Fraud into the [R] 20th Circuit, against [R] parties of the MBS; IMPAC SECURED ASSETS-2005-2, who also had bogus IRS tax exempt status, only to have the Republican judges refuse to grant Plaintiff relief of any kind, despite Federal Court Orders to do so, and allow WELLS FARGO to file case 07-CA-16767, based upon a false AFFIDAVIT, and sustain said case, based entirely on false pretenses.<br />
4.	All [R] lawyers and judges are merely Corporate Franchise Court, Revenue Collection Agents, working for the REPUBLICAN C.E.O.’s  JOHN STUMPF-WFB; THOMAS MARANO-GMACM BRIAN MOYNIHAN- B.O.A., who are agencies of the private FEDERAL RESERVE BANK.<br />
5.	In both and all cases, [R] lawyers and judges violate the UCC, Constitution and statutes to facilitate the taking of equity, property, credit and money by bias, prejudice and phony AFFIDAVITS.<br />
ALL YOU SHEEP NEED TO RECLAIM YOUR SOVEREIGNTY AND DESTROY THE THIEVES</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: triumphant		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2013/04/12/bar-fight-rare-dispute-within-florida-bar-over-quickie-foreclosure-bills-heats-up/#comment-409876</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[triumphant]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 23:04:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=58861#comment-409876</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Oh, and Mr. Belcher and the Florida Bar is looking out for the interests of &quot;the lender.&quot; Now that&#039;s a laugh. How about the Florida Bar sticks to worrying allowing the actual parties to mortgage contracts - once upon a time called MORTGAGORS and MORTGAGEES - get a fair adjudication of their disputes in Court while weighing the rights of actual property OWNERS. I&#039;d bet there are very few foreclosures initiated in Florida by &quot;lenders&quot; whoever Mr. Belcher thinks they are...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and Mr. Belcher and the Florida Bar is looking out for the interests of &#8220;the lender.&#8221; Now that&#8217;s a laugh. How about the Florida Bar sticks to worrying allowing the actual parties to mortgage contracts &#8211; once upon a time called MORTGAGORS and MORTGAGEES &#8211; get a fair adjudication of their disputes in Court while weighing the rights of actual property OWNERS. I&#8217;d bet there are very few foreclosures initiated in Florida by &#8220;lenders&#8221; whoever Mr. Belcher thinks they are&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: triumphant		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2013/04/12/bar-fight-rare-dispute-within-florida-bar-over-quickie-foreclosure-bills-heats-up/#comment-409875</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[triumphant]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 22:57:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=58861#comment-409875</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Mr. Belcher sez:

&quot;The section has remained keenly aware that foreclosure reform must fairly balance the competing interests of the property owner, the lender, and the good faith purchaser of foreclosed property. Consistent with that goal, the section has vigorously opposed any amendments to existing Florida law governing real property foreclosures unless they preserve and protect the property and due process rights of those parties in a fundamentally fair way.&quot;

Say what!?! Wellll, if that was actually true, then why are all the bill provisions that are blatently bankster-friendly - i.e., 702.036 (&quot;finality&quot; of foreclosures), 702.10 (&quot;show cause,&quot; requirement for payments to &quot;plaintiff,&quot; etc. b.s.) proposed to apply to all PENDING actions effective IMMEDIATELY, while the pro-homeower provisions, such as the so-called &quot;pleading&quot; requirements of 702.015 (which actually are already law and mandated by Florida Rules, and yet are routinely ignored by the courts) proposed to ONLY apply to actions brought AFTER July 1, 2013? 

WAKE UP PEOPLE! Take note that the bankster-owned politicians are selling you out!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Belcher sez:</p>
<p>&#8220;The section has remained keenly aware that foreclosure reform must fairly balance the competing interests of the property owner, the lender, and the good faith purchaser of foreclosed property. Consistent with that goal, the section has vigorously opposed any amendments to existing Florida law governing real property foreclosures unless they preserve and protect the property and due process rights of those parties in a fundamentally fair way.&#8221;</p>
<p>Say what!?! Wellll, if that was actually true, then why are all the bill provisions that are blatently bankster-friendly &#8211; i.e., 702.036 (&#8220;finality&#8221; of foreclosures), 702.10 (&#8220;show cause,&#8221; requirement for payments to &#8220;plaintiff,&#8221; etc. b.s.) proposed to apply to all PENDING actions effective IMMEDIATELY, while the pro-homeower provisions, such as the so-called &#8220;pleading&#8221; requirements of 702.015 (which actually are already law and mandated by Florida Rules, and yet are routinely ignored by the courts) proposed to ONLY apply to actions brought AFTER July 1, 2013? </p>
<p>WAKE UP PEOPLE! Take note that the bankster-owned politicians are selling you out!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: charley rice		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2013/04/12/bar-fight-rare-dispute-within-florida-bar-over-quickie-foreclosure-bills-heats-up/#comment-409870</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[charley rice]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 18:05:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=58861#comment-409870</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[People ASK yourself,
&quot;WHERE IS THERE A LAW THAT SAYS YOU CAN&#039;T HAVE YOUR HOME BACK FROM A FRAUDULENT FORECLOSURE that was conspired by these DOUBLE DIPPING 2008 TARP NON-LENDER BANKS that NEVER HAD NO STANDING?&quot;
NOW the PEOPLE should tell them to BAILOUT them selves and NOT TO FALL INTO their DECEPTIONS anyMORE or EVER AGAIN of giving your hard earn tax dollars for their DEBT.
DID YOU KNOW THAT THE BANKS are FORBIDDEN under their CHARTERS and TITLE 12 to loan YOU MONEY?
A loan may be defined as the delivery by one party to, and the receipt by another of a sum of money. See: Kirkland v. Bailes, 155 S.E. 2d 701. (Yet the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago says in Modern Money Mechanics that banks make loans by promising to lend.) (However a promise to lend cannot be enforced. In order to constitute a loan, money must be loaned, but banks make loans by promising to lend, and promises to lend cannot be enforced.) 5 MRSA. 
 
This is their illusion of the SMOKE SCREEN which is CREATED to make you think that they loaned YOU money but they NEVER DID...
SO why ARE they STEALING our HOMES?
Wait a minute, THEY HAVE NO STANDING, NO JURISDICTION, NO VENUE!
GOOGLE IT and ASK yourself that QUESTION.
What is wrong with this picture, and why are they steam rolling over the PEOPLES HOMES that they DID NOT lend a SINGLE PENNY to? 
DID YOU EVER SEE THE MONEY?
The PEOPLE that CREATED the money based upon the 1933 Signature Act and THEY always had the POWER ARE the CREDITOR. GOOGLE IT read it for yourself.
WHO ever IS LETTING the TARP BANKS do this to the PEOPLE, and get away with this ACT is AN ENEMY OF WAR and CREATING WAR UPON THE PEOPLE.
“THIS IS TREASON!”
THE COURTS are Obstructing Justice.
&quot;YOU ARE NOW PUT ON NOTICE&quot; to STOP doing HOSTILE takeover of the PEOPLE’S LAND and RESCIND the peoples homes.
You CAN’T steal a HOME and KEEP it just to blame it on ERROR.
THE PRIME BANK NEVER HAD NO STANDING, AND THEY ALL BROKE THE LAWS by ROBOSIGNING on zombie SUBPRIME BANKS that HAD been out of business for over (5) five YEARS that had CREATED and now had CANCELLED your DEFECTIVE INSTRUMENT ASSETS which are UNENFORCEABLE.
&quot;THE COURTS ONLY DEAL WITH CONTRACTS,&quot; and EVERY HOMEOWNER SUBPRIME so called LENDER that went out business has given them A CANCELLED CONTRACT.  &quot;YOU CAN only have ONE LENDER.&quot;
THEREFORE THE COURTS, JUDGES, CANNOT ENFORCE A CANCELLED DEED OF TRUST CONTRACT.  
NOW THE COURTS HAVE MADE SERIOUS ERRORS!
TO NOT GIVE BACK the PEOPLES HOME is BREAKING the TEN COMMANDMENT LAW, the HIGHEST LAW upon the LAND.
” THOU SHALL NOT STEAL”
THE PEOPLE WILL WAKE UP and NOT be the Sheepie no more.
GOD DOESN’T LIKE EVIL and SOON YOU WILL FEEL his MIGHTY HAND upon YOU for YOU CAN’T NO LONGER HIDE and your days are numbered.
WAKE UP PEOPLE!  First they stole the GOLD, SILVER, now your HOMES next will be YOUR hard earned MONEY.

&quot;GET READY BECA-- USE THE HO-- USE OF CARDS ARE ABOUT TO CRUMBLE.&quot;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People ASK yourself,<br />
&#8220;WHERE IS THERE A LAW THAT SAYS YOU CAN&#8217;T HAVE YOUR HOME BACK FROM A FRAUDULENT FORECLOSURE that was conspired by these DOUBLE DIPPING 2008 TARP NON-LENDER BANKS that NEVER HAD NO STANDING?&#8221;<br />
NOW the PEOPLE should tell them to BAILOUT them selves and NOT TO FALL INTO their DECEPTIONS anyMORE or EVER AGAIN of giving your hard earn tax dollars for their DEBT.<br />
DID YOU KNOW THAT THE BANKS are FORBIDDEN under their CHARTERS and TITLE 12 to loan YOU MONEY?<br />
A loan may be defined as the delivery by one party to, and the receipt by another of a sum of money. See: Kirkland v. Bailes, 155 S.E. 2d 701. (Yet the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago says in Modern Money Mechanics that banks make loans by promising to lend.) (However a promise to lend cannot be enforced. In order to constitute a loan, money must be loaned, but banks make loans by promising to lend, and promises to lend cannot be enforced.) 5 MRSA. </p>
<p>This is their illusion of the SMOKE SCREEN which is CREATED to make you think that they loaned YOU money but they NEVER DID&#8230;<br />
SO why ARE they STEALING our HOMES?<br />
Wait a minute, THEY HAVE NO STANDING, NO JURISDICTION, NO VENUE!<br />
GOOGLE IT and ASK yourself that QUESTION.<br />
What is wrong with this picture, and why are they steam rolling over the PEOPLES HOMES that they DID NOT lend a SINGLE PENNY to?<br />
DID YOU EVER SEE THE MONEY?<br />
The PEOPLE that CREATED the money based upon the 1933 Signature Act and THEY always had the POWER ARE the CREDITOR. GOOGLE IT read it for yourself.<br />
WHO ever IS LETTING the TARP BANKS do this to the PEOPLE, and get away with this ACT is AN ENEMY OF WAR and CREATING WAR UPON THE PEOPLE.<br />
“THIS IS TREASON!”<br />
THE COURTS are Obstructing Justice.<br />
&#8220;YOU ARE NOW PUT ON NOTICE&#8221; to STOP doing HOSTILE takeover of the PEOPLE’S LAND and RESCIND the peoples homes.<br />
You CAN’T steal a HOME and KEEP it just to blame it on ERROR.<br />
THE PRIME BANK NEVER HAD NO STANDING, AND THEY ALL BROKE THE LAWS by ROBOSIGNING on zombie SUBPRIME BANKS that HAD been out of business for over (5) five YEARS that had CREATED and now had CANCELLED your DEFECTIVE INSTRUMENT ASSETS which are UNENFORCEABLE.<br />
&#8220;THE COURTS ONLY DEAL WITH CONTRACTS,&#8221; and EVERY HOMEOWNER SUBPRIME so called LENDER that went out business has given them A CANCELLED CONTRACT.  &#8220;YOU CAN only have ONE LENDER.&#8221;<br />
THEREFORE THE COURTS, JUDGES, CANNOT ENFORCE A CANCELLED DEED OF TRUST CONTRACT.<br />
NOW THE COURTS HAVE MADE SERIOUS ERRORS!<br />
TO NOT GIVE BACK the PEOPLES HOME is BREAKING the TEN COMMANDMENT LAW, the HIGHEST LAW upon the LAND.<br />
” THOU SHALL NOT STEAL”<br />
THE PEOPLE WILL WAKE UP and NOT be the Sheepie no more.<br />
GOD DOESN’T LIKE EVIL and SOON YOU WILL FEEL his MIGHTY HAND upon YOU for YOU CAN’T NO LONGER HIDE and your days are numbered.<br />
WAKE UP PEOPLE!  First they stole the GOLD, SILVER, now your HOMES next will be YOUR hard earned MONEY.</p>
<p>&#8220;GET READY BECA&#8211; USE THE HO&#8211; USE OF CARDS ARE ABOUT TO CRUMBLE.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: yvonne		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2013/04/12/bar-fight-rare-dispute-within-florida-bar-over-quickie-foreclosure-bills-heats-up/#comment-409868</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[yvonne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 16:37:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=58861#comment-409868</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://4closurefraud.org/2013/04/12/bar-fight-rare-dispute-within-florida-bar-over-quickie-foreclosure-bills-heats-up/#comment-409865&quot;&gt;no names, please&lt;/a&gt;.

I agree with you on this...they are making a difference....]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://4closurefraud.org/2013/04/12/bar-fight-rare-dispute-within-florida-bar-over-quickie-foreclosure-bills-heats-up/#comment-409865">no names, please</a>.</p>
<p>I agree with you on this&#8230;they are making a difference&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Rob Harrington		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2013/04/12/bar-fight-rare-dispute-within-florida-bar-over-quickie-foreclosure-bills-heats-up/#comment-409866</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rob Harrington]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 16:22:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=58861#comment-409866</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[http://www.floridabar.org/DIVCOM/JN/jnnews01.nsf/8c9f13012b96736985256aa900624829/d9c272af13597c7585257b470042644a!OpenDocument

And what is the response to Wm. Fletcher Belcher, Chair
Real Property, Probate and Trust Law Section of The Florida Bar? 

What say you our Florida defenders?
Roy Oppenheim
Mark P. Stopa
Evan M. Rosen
Jacquelyn Trask
Thomas Ice
Matthew D. Weidner
Christopher D. Forrest
Charles R. Gallagher III
Chip Parker
Geoffrey Sherman
Lynn Szymoniak
Margery Golant
Ellen Pilelsky
Marc Marra
Matthew Bavaro
Darin Lentner
Jon Coats
Carmen Dellutri
Jonathan Kline
Stephanie Taylor
Joshua Strudwick
J. Wil Morris
Chae duPont
Dominick Salfi
C. Michael Duncan
Manny Singh
Jaitegh Singh
Sergio Cabanas]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.floridabar.org/DIVCOM/JN/jnnews01.nsf/8c9f13012b96736985256aa900624829/d9c272af13597c7585257b470042644a!OpenDocument" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.floridabar.org/DIVCOM/JN/jnnews01.nsf/8c9f13012b96736985256aa900624829/d9c272af13597c7585257b470042644a!OpenDocument</a></p>
<p>And what is the response to Wm. Fletcher Belcher, Chair<br />
Real Property, Probate and Trust Law Section of The Florida Bar? </p>
<p>What say you our Florida defenders?<br />
Roy Oppenheim<br />
Mark P. Stopa<br />
Evan M. Rosen<br />
Jacquelyn Trask<br />
Thomas Ice<br />
Matthew D. Weidner<br />
Christopher D. Forrest<br />
Charles R. Gallagher III<br />
Chip Parker<br />
Geoffrey Sherman<br />
Lynn Szymoniak<br />
Margery Golant<br />
Ellen Pilelsky<br />
Marc Marra<br />
Matthew Bavaro<br />
Darin Lentner<br />
Jon Coats<br />
Carmen Dellutri<br />
Jonathan Kline<br />
Stephanie Taylor<br />
Joshua Strudwick<br />
J. Wil Morris<br />
Chae duPont<br />
Dominick Salfi<br />
C. Michael Duncan<br />
Manny Singh<br />
Jaitegh Singh<br />
Sergio Cabanas</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: no names, please		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2013/04/12/bar-fight-rare-dispute-within-florida-bar-over-quickie-foreclosure-bills-heats-up/#comment-409865</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[no names, please]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 15:49:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=58861#comment-409865</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s nice to know there are still some honorable attorneys who are interested in the integrity of their profession; most have gone over to the dark side and are unworthy of our respect.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s nice to know there are still some honorable attorneys who are interested in the integrity of their profession; most have gone over to the dark side and are unworthy of our respect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
