Comments on: Passidomo’s Foreclosure Reform Proposal Passes Legislature

By: 1fothemany

1fothemany — Mon, 06 May 2013 01:04:27 +0000

even more reason for ALLLLLLL to step up together and make a suit tort/damages!!!!demand restitution NOW, they can not fit all ripped off people into a judges chambers, this is not good, playing with the english language again!! they know what they did!!! AND they have been caught.. the damn check being sent is proof…period ……the creator will damn these people but not soon enough for me

By: Reina

Reina — Mon, 06 May 2013 00:47:54 +0000

Well, you know who not to elect next time; hopefully the governor will see the intent of Ms. Passidomo’s who can be inferred that she works for the banks and not for those who elected her and trusted that she follows the constitution of the USA. I hope someday in her life she realizes that due process is important in our Amend, 14th. However, I trust the governor will read between the lines and realize that just because you are Republican does not make you make the wrong choices to benefit only the rich (banks) who have fraudulently foreclosed the houses. I am a Republican and a shame of Ms. Passidomo’s which discredit the Republican party conception of the citizens rights and respect the Constitution of the United State of American.

By: Mystify

Mystify — Sat, 04 May 2013 16:49:19 +0000

Kathleen will get hers one day….karma

By: Sue Em

Sue Em — Fri, 03 May 2013 21:48:51 +0000

Gotta love that “the homeowner can still sue”! Like homeowners in distress have the money for that. Oh wait – may be you got a $ 300 check from the settlement – that would just almost pay for the filing fee in court…..

By: Mark Bowen

Mark Bowen — Fri, 03 May 2013 17:55:53 +0000

Borrower? Lender? In civil litigation, who is the “borrower” and who is the “lender”? I always thought a “Plaintiff” brought an action against a “Defendant”. You want to pass legislation that is “consumer friendly”? How about proposing a Bill that requires the Court to demand the “Plaintiff” show a cause of action (proof of loss). This Bill is an act of treason against “the State” (constitutionally defined as “the people”).