<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: The Monarchs Of Money &#8211; A Brief Documentary on the World&#8217;s Most Powerful Cabal	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://4closurefraud.org/2013/05/05/the-monarchs-of-money-a-brief-documentary-on-the-worlds-most-powerful-cabal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2013/05/05/the-monarchs-of-money-a-brief-documentary-on-the-worlds-most-powerful-cabal/</link>
	<description>- Fighting Foreclosure Fraud BY SHARING THE KNOWLEDGE</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 May 2013 14:50:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: JEHR		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2013/05/05/the-monarchs-of-money-a-brief-documentary-on-the-worlds-most-powerful-cabal/#comment-411614</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JEHR]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 May 2013 14:50:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=59435#comment-411614</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I understand that this is the first in a series of programs.  I was hoping it would be a little more hard-hitting by naming how the five largest banks in Canada were injected with &quot;liquidity&quot; after the 2008 crisis, some to the tune of 100% of their equity.  (See:  http://www.policyalternatives.ca/sites/default/files/uploads/publications/National%20Office/2012/04/Big%20Banks%20Big%20Secret.pdf chart on page 6) 

The series also did not mention that some Canadian banks borrowed funds in the billions from the US Federal Reserve Discount Window.  See:  page 14 in the above document.  One bank received money from TARP via AIG bail money to Goldman Sachs.

Now we see that Canadian banks are TOO BIG TO FAIL (  http://www.thestar.com/opinion/commentary/2013/04/03/all_of_canadas_major_banks_too_big_to_fail_goar.html  ) which just means when they become insolvent, the government will bail them out.  We should also mention that in the latest Harper/Flaherty budget, there is a bail-in provision which means depositor&#039;s funds can be used to make an insolvent bank whole.   

Do you feel that our banks are safe?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I understand that this is the first in a series of programs.  I was hoping it would be a little more hard-hitting by naming how the five largest banks in Canada were injected with &#8220;liquidity&#8221; after the 2008 crisis, some to the tune of 100% of their equity.  (See:  <a href="http://www.policyalternatives.ca/sites/default/files/uploads/publications/National%20Office/2012/04/Big%20Banks%20Big%20Secret.pdf" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.policyalternatives.ca/sites/default/files/uploads/publications/National%20Office/2012/04/Big%20Banks%20Big%20Secret.pdf</a> chart on page 6) </p>
<p>The series also did not mention that some Canadian banks borrowed funds in the billions from the US Federal Reserve Discount Window.  See:  page 14 in the above document.  One bank received money from TARP via AIG bail money to Goldman Sachs.</p>
<p>Now we see that Canadian banks are TOO BIG TO FAIL (  <a href="http://www.thestar.com/opinion/commentary/2013/04/03/all_of_canadas_major_banks_too_big_to_fail_goar.html" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.thestar.com/opinion/commentary/2013/04/03/all_of_canadas_major_banks_too_big_to_fail_goar.html</a>  ) which just means when they become insolvent, the government will bail them out.  We should also mention that in the latest Harper/Flaherty budget, there is a bail-in provision which means depositor&#8217;s funds can be used to make an insolvent bank whole.   </p>
<p>Do you feel that our banks are safe?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
