<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Law Offices of Evan M. Rosen: Our Latest Appeal &#8211; Witness Does Not Know the Name of His Plaintiff	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://4closurefraud.org/2013/05/09/law-offices-of-evan-m-rosen-our-latest-appeal-witness-does-not-know-the-name-of-his-plaintiff/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2013/05/09/law-offices-of-evan-m-rosen-our-latest-appeal-witness-does-not-know-the-name-of-his-plaintiff/</link>
	<description>- Fighting Foreclosure Fraud BY SHARING THE KNOWLEDGE</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2015 22:30:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: BOBBI SWANN		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2013/05/09/law-offices-of-evan-m-rosen-our-latest-appeal-witness-does-not-know-the-name-of-his-plaintiff/#comment-412161</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[BOBBI SWANN]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 14:18:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=59542#comment-412161</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This is outrageous!  Mr. Rosen, despite the respect and admiration that you have for this Judge, you should have made an immediate appeal to the court to 1) have this Judge removed from the case for bias; or 2) challenged his decision asking what grounds the request was denied.  Case law and evidence was square in his face and still he side-stepped the law and ruled against the Rule of Evidence.  If that isn&#039;t bias I don&#039;t know what is....]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is outrageous!  Mr. Rosen, despite the respect and admiration that you have for this Judge, you should have made an immediate appeal to the court to 1) have this Judge removed from the case for bias; or 2) challenged his decision asking what grounds the request was denied.  Case law and evidence was square in his face and still he side-stepped the law and ruled against the Rule of Evidence.  If that isn&#8217;t bias I don&#8217;t know what is&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Andrew Jackson		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2013/05/09/law-offices-of-evan-m-rosen-our-latest-appeal-witness-does-not-know-the-name-of-his-plaintiff/#comment-411831</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Jackson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 19:55:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=59542#comment-411831</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[WOW!!!  The banks witness says I&#039;ve got nothing to show any authority to foreclose or even testify, and still, NO dismissal?!?!?  

Wait until HB 87 goes into effect and time for discovery is eliminated.  The banksters and their mill attorneys are going to go on a massive property theft spree.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WOW!!!  The banks witness says I&#8217;ve got nothing to show any authority to foreclose or even testify, and still, NO dismissal?!?!?  </p>
<p>Wait until HB 87 goes into effect and time for discovery is eliminated.  The banksters and their mill attorneys are going to go on a massive property theft spree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
