<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: FORECLOSURE CASE BOMBSHELL &#8211; A JUDGE EXPLAINS WHY FORECLOSURE IS A FRAUD!	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://4closurefraud.org/2013/07/09/foreclosure-case-bombshell-a-judge-explains-why-foreclosure-is-a-fraud/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2013/07/09/foreclosure-case-bombshell-a-judge-explains-why-foreclosure-is-a-fraud/</link>
	<description>- Fighting Foreclosure Fraud BY SHARING THE KNOWLEDGE</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2025 15:17:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: stanbsch		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2013/07/09/foreclosure-case-bombshell-a-judge-explains-why-foreclosure-is-a-fraud/#comment-731122</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[stanbsch]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Oct 2017 18:06:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=60251#comment-731122</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://4closurefraud.org/2013/07/09/foreclosure-case-bombshell-a-judge-explains-why-foreclosure-is-a-fraud/#comment-700708&quot;&gt;frontncenter&lt;/a&gt;.

Have you continued to research Washington Mutual Bank, WMBfsb,WMBFA  etc. eg  After 9/25/08,a)Where were the shares of WAMB? Whoowned them? Did Chaseever buy it  b) The OTS was a major corrupt player in the WAMB fraudulent activities  Have you noticed its approval(2005)of a WAMB and FA combo ,name change to WAMB and permitting WAMB to use FA as a &quot;doing business&quot; name.  Was it a merger? Combination? Acquisition?  Where has Chase said it OWNS FA Whare has Chase said it was the successor in interest to WAMB, or FA
WHY was FA used  before 2008  ,after?
What was fsb. It was a WAMB subsidiary  so went to Chase as an asset What did it do?
What happened to Securitization Companies WAMB used but did not own?
WAMU ASSET ACQUISITION
WAMU MORTGAGE SECURITIES
WAMU CAPITAL]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://4closurefraud.org/2013/07/09/foreclosure-case-bombshell-a-judge-explains-why-foreclosure-is-a-fraud/#comment-700708">frontncenter</a>.</p>
<p>Have you continued to research Washington Mutual Bank, WMBfsb,WMBFA  etc. eg  After 9/25/08,a)Where were the shares of WAMB? Whoowned them? Did Chaseever buy it  b) The OTS was a major corrupt player in the WAMB fraudulent activities  Have you noticed its approval(2005)of a WAMB and FA combo ,name change to WAMB and permitting WAMB to use FA as a &#8220;doing business&#8221; name.  Was it a merger? Combination? Acquisition?  Where has Chase said it OWNS FA Whare has Chase said it was the successor in interest to WAMB, or FA<br />
WHY was FA used  before 2008  ,after?<br />
What was fsb. It was a WAMB subsidiary  so went to Chase as an asset What did it do?<br />
What happened to Securitization Companies WAMB used but did not own?<br />
WAMU ASSET ACQUISITION<br />
WAMU MORTGAGE SECURITIES<br />
WAMU CAPITAL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ronald Williams		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2013/07/09/foreclosure-case-bombshell-a-judge-explains-why-foreclosure-is-a-fraud/#comment-701320</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ronald Williams]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2017 04:19:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=60251#comment-701320</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://4closurefraud.org/2013/07/09/foreclosure-case-bombshell-a-judge-explains-why-foreclosure-is-a-fraud/#comment-619452&quot;&gt;Ed Simpson&lt;/a&gt;.

We have been contesting Chase regarding its FDIC acquisition claim for eight years. But on June 24, 2016 its associate in fact - National Default Servicing Corporation, purportedly sold our home in a foreclosure sale to a California property investment company - Duke Partners. Right after the phony sale, we filed a complaint alleging an illegal foreclosure. Our complaint was brought under NRS 205.395. By the way, we reside in the State of Nevada. The statute enables challenging foreclosure by challenging the documents recorded to facilitate it. Our complaint is comprehensive and it meets the who, what, when, where and how as it pertains to the fraud as it concerns each document fraudulently recorded against our home. What did the purported foreclosure bidder do? Went to a Justice Court, filed a complaint against us for unlawful detainer, obtained a writ commanding we &quot;restore&quot; our home to Duke Partners. All I just described about the unlawful detainer were illegal conduct between counsel for the purported purchaser of our home, and the Justice Court Judge. [N.R.S. 4.370(g) and N.R.S. 40.255(1)(2)] Nevada is a non-judicial foreclosure state. The statute we relied to challenge the foreclosure by challenging the recordings, provides the right to challenge the foreclosure. Like I said, Nevada is a non-judicial foreclosure state. When a homeowner dares challenge the foreclosing entity, I am sad to report an uncommon number of Nevada judges have been corrupted by the system. Regarding of the evidence a homeowner produces against the validity of a foreclosure, Nevada judges in southern Nevada turns back the evidence. Judges here not only do that, but aid and abet the foreclosing entities in the commission of fraudulent foreclosure. I am not whistling dixie here folks. I have compelling evidence. So much so, I have taken an additional approach. I have filed a criminal complaint against counsel who represented the purchaser and the Judge who issued the writ restoring our home to the purchaser. When any property is taken by trick and device with the intent to permanently deprive the owner, the crime of grand larceny of real property has occurred. We are starting up an internet radio site where we hope to provide information, but also obtain the vast number of similarly situated homeowner victims of Chase. One more thing: I have met the prerequisites to sue the FDIC under the Federal Tort Claims Act. The FDIC has responded to my claim(s) against it by denying compensation we demanded. Our next step is to simply sue it like it is a person. I am at rnwil3@aol.com. We need to form a special interest collaboration to deal with Chase&#039;s Nationwide RICO scheme,]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://4closurefraud.org/2013/07/09/foreclosure-case-bombshell-a-judge-explains-why-foreclosure-is-a-fraud/#comment-619452">Ed Simpson</a>.</p>
<p>We have been contesting Chase regarding its FDIC acquisition claim for eight years. But on June 24, 2016 its associate in fact &#8211; National Default Servicing Corporation, purportedly sold our home in a foreclosure sale to a California property investment company &#8211; Duke Partners. Right after the phony sale, we filed a complaint alleging an illegal foreclosure. Our complaint was brought under NRS 205.395. By the way, we reside in the State of Nevada. The statute enables challenging foreclosure by challenging the documents recorded to facilitate it. Our complaint is comprehensive and it meets the who, what, when, where and how as it pertains to the fraud as it concerns each document fraudulently recorded against our home. What did the purported foreclosure bidder do? Went to a Justice Court, filed a complaint against us for unlawful detainer, obtained a writ commanding we &#8220;restore&#8221; our home to Duke Partners. All I just described about the unlawful detainer were illegal conduct between counsel for the purported purchaser of our home, and the Justice Court Judge. [N.R.S. 4.370(g) and N.R.S. 40.255(1)(2)] Nevada is a non-judicial foreclosure state. The statute we relied to challenge the foreclosure by challenging the recordings, provides the right to challenge the foreclosure. Like I said, Nevada is a non-judicial foreclosure state. When a homeowner dares challenge the foreclosing entity, I am sad to report an uncommon number of Nevada judges have been corrupted by the system. Regarding of the evidence a homeowner produces against the validity of a foreclosure, Nevada judges in southern Nevada turns back the evidence. Judges here not only do that, but aid and abet the foreclosing entities in the commission of fraudulent foreclosure. I am not whistling dixie here folks. I have compelling evidence. So much so, I have taken an additional approach. I have filed a criminal complaint against counsel who represented the purchaser and the Judge who issued the writ restoring our home to the purchaser. When any property is taken by trick and device with the intent to permanently deprive the owner, the crime of grand larceny of real property has occurred. We are starting up an internet radio site where we hope to provide information, but also obtain the vast number of similarly situated homeowner victims of Chase. One more thing: I have met the prerequisites to sue the FDIC under the Federal Tort Claims Act. The FDIC has responded to my claim(s) against it by denying compensation we demanded. Our next step is to simply sue it like it is a person. I am at <a href="mailto:rnwil3@aol.com">rnwil3@aol.com</a>. We need to form a special interest collaboration to deal with Chase&#8217;s Nationwide RICO scheme,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: frontncenter		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2013/07/09/foreclosure-case-bombshell-a-judge-explains-why-foreclosure-is-a-fraud/#comment-700721</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[frontncenter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2017 08:02:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=60251#comment-700721</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Don&#039;t forget to post your lists of findings to help others.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t forget to post your lists of findings to help others.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: frontncenter		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2013/07/09/foreclosure-case-bombshell-a-judge-explains-why-foreclosure-is-a-fraud/#comment-700717</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[frontncenter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2017 08:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=60251#comment-700717</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The reason people are getting railroaded in court is because they aren&#039;t doing the work that&#039;s needed.  You have to research all the frauds up on the court committed by your bank, all the fines and penalties, all the orders and deferred prosecutions, and present them to the court. They can&#039;t ignore that. You have to present it as a special circumstance that allows them to deviate from the normal rules. 

The courts are trying to treat these cases as if they were normal circumstances, but they aren&#039;t. The goal is to show they are habitual offenders, and thus cannot be taken at their word. Especially when habitual acts of fraud upon the court is concerned. They have a duty to protect the integrity of the judicial system.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The reason people are getting railroaded in court is because they aren&#8217;t doing the work that&#8217;s needed.  You have to research all the frauds up on the court committed by your bank, all the fines and penalties, all the orders and deferred prosecutions, and present them to the court. They can&#8217;t ignore that. You have to present it as a special circumstance that allows them to deviate from the normal rules. </p>
<p>The courts are trying to treat these cases as if they were normal circumstances, but they aren&#8217;t. The goal is to show they are habitual offenders, and thus cannot be taken at their word. Especially when habitual acts of fraud upon the court is concerned. They have a duty to protect the integrity of the judicial system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: frontncenter		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2013/07/09/foreclosure-case-bombshell-a-judge-explains-why-foreclosure-is-a-fraud/#comment-700708</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[frontncenter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2017 07:48:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=60251#comment-700708</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A BIGGER BOMBSHELL!!!!   Chase never acquired Washington Mutual FA. 

Not according to the Title II Lender Summary from HUD. According to that information;

JPMC NA (FDIC# 628 / ID# 30141) only acquired  

WMB fsb (FDIC# 33891 / ID# 55057) on 10/7/2008. 1 branch. Home office # 09996. 

I guess what it comes down to is who&#039;s more creditable and who has more reason to lie? HUD or the FDIC. 
For the latter, I&#039;d put my money on the FDIC. They definitely did everything shady.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A BIGGER BOMBSHELL!!!!   Chase never acquired Washington Mutual FA. </p>
<p>Not according to the Title II Lender Summary from HUD. According to that information;</p>
<p>JPMC NA (FDIC# 628 / ID# 30141) only acquired  </p>
<p>WMB fsb (FDIC# 33891 / ID# 55057) on 10/7/2008. 1 branch. Home office # 09996. </p>
<p>I guess what it comes down to is who&#8217;s more creditable and who has more reason to lie? HUD or the FDIC.<br />
For the latter, I&#8217;d put my money on the FDIC. They definitely did everything shady.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ronald Williams		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2013/07/09/foreclosure-case-bombshell-a-judge-explains-why-foreclosure-is-a-fraud/#comment-636942</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ronald Williams]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2015 22:53:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=60251#comment-636942</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://4closurefraud.org/2013/07/09/foreclosure-case-bombshell-a-judge-explains-why-foreclosure-is-a-fraud/#comment-416995&quot;&gt;me&lt;/a&gt;.

In the State of Nevada, Judges have to solicit contributions to run to be re-installed in office. Guess who are their main contributors. Right, law firms. We are fighting against Judges more than against attorneys for Chase Bank as we try to avoid being victims of a fraudulent foreclosure. The Judges overseen by the Justices of the Nevada Supreme Court are so bad and dishonest, that Chase if getting away with foreclosures where the default notice is represented to be initiated by Washington Mutual Bank. The problem is that the default notices are being executed and recorded well after Washington Mutual was no longer a bank. In our case, according to our notice, Washington Mutual caused the recording of  a default notice just last year. Therefore, some six years after it was closed. Judge Kathleen Delaney is the Judge the top Justices caused to be the Judge presiding over proceedings brought by homeowners challenging mediation proceedings. While she may be a good judge in other matters, she is completely and totally corrupt in her judicial duties having to do with foreclosure mediation petitions. But she is no less corrupt that the Chief Judge of Nevada&#039;s Eighth District or another one name Rob Bare. All of these judge have allowed their courts to be corrupted in the effort to enable Chase BAnk attorney to subject homowners to fraud and extortion. I can name names due to my absolute proof of what I say. I am at rnwil3@aol.com. I am still fighting but before the named judges who have yet to provide me a hearing on any of my not opposed Motions.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://4closurefraud.org/2013/07/09/foreclosure-case-bombshell-a-judge-explains-why-foreclosure-is-a-fraud/#comment-416995">me</a>.</p>
<p>In the State of Nevada, Judges have to solicit contributions to run to be re-installed in office. Guess who are their main contributors. Right, law firms. We are fighting against Judges more than against attorneys for Chase Bank as we try to avoid being victims of a fraudulent foreclosure. The Judges overseen by the Justices of the Nevada Supreme Court are so bad and dishonest, that Chase if getting away with foreclosures where the default notice is represented to be initiated by Washington Mutual Bank. The problem is that the default notices are being executed and recorded well after Washington Mutual was no longer a bank. In our case, according to our notice, Washington Mutual caused the recording of  a default notice just last year. Therefore, some six years after it was closed. Judge Kathleen Delaney is the Judge the top Justices caused to be the Judge presiding over proceedings brought by homeowners challenging mediation proceedings. While she may be a good judge in other matters, she is completely and totally corrupt in her judicial duties having to do with foreclosure mediation petitions. But she is no less corrupt that the Chief Judge of Nevada&#8217;s Eighth District or another one name Rob Bare. All of these judge have allowed their courts to be corrupted in the effort to enable Chase BAnk attorney to subject homowners to fraud and extortion. I can name names due to my absolute proof of what I say. I am at <a href="mailto:rnwil3@aol.com">rnwil3@aol.com</a>. I am still fighting but before the named judges who have yet to provide me a hearing on any of my not opposed Motions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ed Simpson		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2013/07/09/foreclosure-case-bombshell-a-judge-explains-why-foreclosure-is-a-fraud/#comment-619452</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ed Simpson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2015 01:57:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=60251#comment-619452</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[We have been dealing with the same injustice in the state of Tennessee.My wife and I were forced out of our home after the foreclosings party was granted summary judgement without producing a single piece of evidence we had asked for them to produce in court. The same judge that granted the judgment didn&#039;t order the eviction either. We have tried to be heard in several  other courts with the same unjust results.There were several judges that reclused themselves because of their relationship with the judge that granted the summarry . judgement. The last judge made it clear of his relationship with that judge and that he was not going to rule against any decision that was made .The courts in Tennessee are very biased and unfair in wrongful foreclosures.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have been dealing with the same injustice in the state of Tennessee.My wife and I were forced out of our home after the foreclosings party was granted summary judgement without producing a single piece of evidence we had asked for them to produce in court. The same judge that granted the judgment didn&#8217;t order the eviction either. We have tried to be heard in several  other courts with the same unjust results.There were several judges that reclused themselves because of their relationship with the judge that granted the summarry . judgement. The last judge made it clear of his relationship with that judge and that he was not going to rule against any decision that was made .The courts in Tennessee are very biased and unfair in wrongful foreclosures.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: izraul		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2013/07/09/foreclosure-case-bombshell-a-judge-explains-why-foreclosure-is-a-fraud/#comment-473564</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[izraul]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2014 08:16:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=60251#comment-473564</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://4closurefraud.org/2013/07/09/foreclosure-case-bombshell-a-judge-explains-why-foreclosure-is-a-fraud/#comment-453266&quot;&gt;Matthew Cuyler&lt;/a&gt;.

That is a question everyone should focus on. Although opinions will conflict, the fact is judges can be held accountable for any wrongdoing. You have the right to disqualify any judge, at any time, for any reason. Judges aware of conflicts have a legal duty to recuse themselves. There is no discretion in a judges duties to act. A non-judicial act, is a ministerial act and judicial immunity is only reserved for judicial acts. There&#039;s no immunity for criminal acts, assisting,  conniving or ignoring others engaged in criminal acts. 

&quot;Under Federal law which is applicable to all states, the U.S. Supreme Court stated that if a court is &quot;without authority, its judgments and orders are regarded as nullities. They are not voidable, but simply void; and form no bar to a recovery sought, even prior to a reversal in opposition to them. They constitute no justification; and all persons concerned in executing such judgments or sentences, are considered, in law, as trespassers.&quot;Elliot v. Piersol, 1 Pet. 328, 340, 26 U.S. 328, 340 (1828)&quot;

A judge warring with the constitution is guilty of treason. Judges pathetic attempts of grand jury tampering to limit our recourse will not save their sorry asses. The same goes for lawyers. These legal imposters need pray as it only takes one monster at law, in law, for law, Unfortunately, attorney&#039;s of that stature are far few and between. Permit to cross the bar lay in exchange of one&#039;s balls, (B.A.R.)balls are redeemed)), in the interest of injustice. 

Only when a former U.S. attorney like Richard E. Fine goes on a rampage, does law manifest truth. aka Judicial nightmare.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://4closurefraud.org/2013/07/09/foreclosure-case-bombshell-a-judge-explains-why-foreclosure-is-a-fraud/#comment-453266">Matthew Cuyler</a>.</p>
<p>That is a question everyone should focus on. Although opinions will conflict, the fact is judges can be held accountable for any wrongdoing. You have the right to disqualify any judge, at any time, for any reason. Judges aware of conflicts have a legal duty to recuse themselves. There is no discretion in a judges duties to act. A non-judicial act, is a ministerial act and judicial immunity is only reserved for judicial acts. There&#8217;s no immunity for criminal acts, assisting,  conniving or ignoring others engaged in criminal acts. </p>
<p>&#8220;Under Federal law which is applicable to all states, the U.S. Supreme Court stated that if a court is &#8220;without authority, its judgments and orders are regarded as nullities. They are not voidable, but simply void; and form no bar to a recovery sought, even prior to a reversal in opposition to them. They constitute no justification; and all persons concerned in executing such judgments or sentences, are considered, in law, as trespassers.&#8221;Elliot v. Piersol, 1 Pet. 328, 340, 26 U.S. 328, 340 (1828)&#8221;</p>
<p>A judge warring with the constitution is guilty of treason. Judges pathetic attempts of grand jury tampering to limit our recourse will not save their sorry asses. The same goes for lawyers. These legal imposters need pray as it only takes one monster at law, in law, for law, Unfortunately, attorney&#8217;s of that stature are far few and between. Permit to cross the bar lay in exchange of one&#8217;s balls, (B.A.R.)balls are redeemed)), in the interest of injustice. </p>
<p>Only when a former U.S. attorney like Richard E. Fine goes on a rampage, does law manifest truth. aka Judicial nightmare.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Matthew Cuyler		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2013/07/09/foreclosure-case-bombshell-a-judge-explains-why-foreclosure-is-a-fraud/#comment-453266</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matthew Cuyler]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2014 15:41:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=60251#comment-453266</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://4closurefraud.org/2013/07/09/foreclosure-case-bombshell-a-judge-explains-why-foreclosure-is-a-fraud/#comment-439801&quot;&gt;tusense96761&lt;/a&gt;.

can judges be sued for rulings of a fraudulent foreclosure claim?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://4closurefraud.org/2013/07/09/foreclosure-case-bombshell-a-judge-explains-why-foreclosure-is-a-fraud/#comment-439801">tusense96761</a>.</p>
<p>can judges be sued for rulings of a fraudulent foreclosure claim?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: C. Osborn		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2013/07/09/foreclosure-case-bombshell-a-judge-explains-why-foreclosure-is-a-fraud/#comment-440502</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[C. Osborn]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2014 13:18:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=60251#comment-440502</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://4closurefraud.org/2013/07/09/foreclosure-case-bombshell-a-judge-explains-why-foreclosure-is-a-fraud/#comment-439801&quot;&gt;tusense96761&lt;/a&gt;.

Get and read the book.....Fighting the Foreclosure Machine (Robert Janes).  You are the defendant...the Bank is the plaintiff.....Make them PROVE they are PETE....Make them PROVE they have the right to do what they are doing.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://4closurefraud.org/2013/07/09/foreclosure-case-bombshell-a-judge-explains-why-foreclosure-is-a-fraud/#comment-439801">tusense96761</a>.</p>
<p>Get and read the book&#8230;..Fighting the Foreclosure Machine (Robert Janes).  You are the defendant&#8230;the Bank is the plaintiff&#8230;..Make them PROVE they are PETE&#8230;.Make them PROVE they have the right to do what they are doing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
