Comments on: Here… It…. Comes… (Foreclosuregate) https://4closurefraud.org/2013/08/27/here-it-comes-foreclosuregate/ - Fighting Foreclosure Fraud BY SHARING THE KNOWLEDGE Mon, 08 Dec 2025 14:28:08 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0 By: bobhurt https://4closurefraud.org/2013/08/27/here-it-comes-foreclosuregate/#comment-446576 Sat, 19 Jul 2014 16:03:14 +0000 https://4closurefraud.org/?p=60511#comment-446576 So, what if a foreclosure plaintiff shows up with a such a note (put into the trust after the closing date) ENDORSED IN BLANK? Doesn’t the UCC require that the holder (or holder’s agent) of a blank endorsed note may enforce it, NO MATTER WHAT? Doesn’t this make the “note entrusted past the closing date” argument just ANOTHER LOSING ARGUMENT? Haven’t numerous California courts deprecated the CA 5th District Glaski opinion by opining that the borrower, not injured by the PSA or assighment, and a non-party to either, has no court standing to enforce or dispute the Pooling and Servicing Agreement OR the assignment of the note?

]]> By: qny1 https://4closurefraud.org/2013/08/27/here-it-comes-foreclosuregate/#comment-420068 Tue, 27 Aug 2013 21:49:36 +0000 https://4closurefraud.org/?p=60511#comment-420068 If you get a letter from a trust stating they own your note and mortgage, send it to the IRS to waive the trust’s tax exemption status. Watch how fast they settle with you. The Trusts cannot own notes or mortgages otherwise they have to pay taxes on it. Check out Overcoming Foreclosures by Norman L Sirak, Atty, published 2012. He died when he was preparing for a promotional tour of his book, what a coincidence. He was charging $1500 for a quiet title claim and his book explains how to do it yourself. Now attorneys are buying his book and want to charge people $15,000 and up for quiet titles. Mr. Sirak wrote the book for the people, go to his website and buy it directly so that his family receives the payment.

]]> By: neidermeyer https://4closurefraud.org/2013/08/27/here-it-comes-foreclosuregate/#comment-420056 Tue, 27 Aug 2013 20:21:20 +0000 https://4closurefraud.org/?p=60511#comment-420056 In reply to Hell NO, No more Bankster Bailouts!.

Those bankster lawyahs will be needing more interns to help put out all the fires …

http://www.cnbc.com/id/100991434

BofA fails to end U.S. mortgage fraud lawsuit as trial nears

NEW YORK, Aug 27 (Reuters) – The U.S. government lawsuit accusing Bank of America Corp of fraudulently selling toxic mortgage loans to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac appears on track to go to trial next month after a judge rejected the bank’s bid to dismiss the case.

In an order made public on Tuesday, U.S. District Judge Jed Rakoff in Manhattan said there are “genuine factual disputes” involving at least one of the government’s theories to warrant letting the case continue against the second-largest U.S. bank. He said he will explain his reasons in due course.

Rakoff’s order clears the way for the case to proceed toward trial, which is scheduled for Sept. 23.

]]> By: macy https://4closurefraud.org/2013/08/27/here-it-comes-foreclosuregate/#comment-420046 Tue, 27 Aug 2013 18:30:44 +0000 https://4closurefraud.org/?p=60511#comment-420046 What is the statutes of limitation regarding this?

]]> By: Hell NO, No more Bankster Bailouts! https://4closurefraud.org/2013/08/27/here-it-comes-foreclosuregate/#comment-420037 Tue, 27 Aug 2013 13:48:36 +0000 https://4closurefraud.org/?p=60511#comment-420037 In reply to Hell NO, No more Bankster Bailouts!.

Correction, BOA has filed for a RE-HEARING. They are fighting the Glaski ruling with the ‘big guns’, even NY law firms.

We need the big guns on our side to jump in on this one. In fact, given that the late transfers to the REMIC trusts INVALIDATE the beneficial tax status of the trust, per IRS code, the ‘big guns’ for the INVESTORS may ALSO want to fight against the BANKSTERS on this one.

Quinn-Emmanuel attorneys, you guys paying attention? Any of the other INVESTOR’S-attorneys taking ‘note’?

]]> By: Hell NO, No more Bankster Bailouts! https://4closurefraud.org/2013/08/27/here-it-comes-foreclosuregate/#comment-420033 Tue, 27 Aug 2013 13:08:05 +0000 https://4closurefraud.org/?p=60511#comment-420033 Bank of America is fighting the PUBLICATION of that Glaski case ruling here in CA.

Even though the result in the Glaski case itself only causes the lower court to have to actually proceed with the case, Bank of America is fighting to keep this ruling from remaining PUBLISHED.

Why are they fighting “PUBLICATION” so hard? Only PUBLISHED cases are easily cited by other cases as ‘case law’.

Bank of America does not like having their ‘Gomes ruling’ here in CA squashed to the side and even trod into the mire and muck it slithered out of.

]]>