Comments on: “An Ongoing Criminal Enterprise”: Why America’s Housing Disaster is Back and Wreaking Terror

By: Stupendous Man - Defender of Liberty, Foe of Tyranny

Stupendous Man - Defender of Liberty, Foe of Tyranny — Thu, 20 Nov 2014 22:59:51 +0000

In reply to talktotennessee. Please reference the 6th Circuit case you're referring to.

By: Ed

Ed — Wed, 19 Nov 2014 21:13:17 +0000

Re Visit this case. Was the ‘settlement’ a cover-up? Who got the money? Tax fraud? Money laundering? ID fraud? Did the loan guarantee officer get indicted? loose his job and pension? Did he testify in front of a congressional investigation? Kickbacks? or a cover for counterfeit mortgage fraud racketeering?? RICO. read evey comment and go to every link. This case makes the horrors of the VA health fraud look petty. How many vets committed suicide do to their being victims of VA mortgage fraud? https://4closurefraud.org/2011/10/05/unsealed-complaint-wells-fargo-bank-of-america-j-p-morgan-chase-and-gmac-mortgage-engaged-in-a-brazen-scheme-to-defraud-our-nations-veterans/

By: talktotennessee

talktotennessee — Wed, 19 Nov 2014 03:26:13 +0000

What tv character recently said that law does not matter. It is who the parties are and what the judge wants. A 6th Circuit federal judge accepted suborned perjury that was documented by sworn testimony and yet he discounted proof of fraud.. His statement was that it made no difference in the ruling he made yet his ruling’s very foundation and explanation was based on the perjured testimony with reference made to the false testimony IN the ruling. The same judge publicly stated the courts need to decide whether Obama was born in the US. [He was appointed by George W]. Political bias is not my point EVEN IF, especially IF, you agree with the opinion and know it has no legal basis or precedent.. It is judgment on personal opinion with a judge thumbing his nose at law that becomes dangerous and becoming common place. It is a trait of pure power hungry activist judges. Judicial inconsistency-favoritism are so rampant in the judicial ranks that anything and everything goes and is often rubber stamped into appellate court, This is not just funky television judges. It goes all the way to the SCOTUS.

I say this to agree with what is written here. If the judge’s opinion is based on moral concept it does not matter how it is was dealt and played. I have seen this first hand.