Mike-
Just saw these june 16 posts on 4closurefraud. Yours was a pretty succinct explanation of the securities contract v the mortgage contract issue which has been idling in the background of this whole mess for years-
So you have any case law, complaints, legal papers discussions etc
To go
Along w this train of thought?
Thanks, Ian Sopko

Thank you for creating this website!
I have been dealing with one of Fannie Mae’s “servicers” since 2014. I have been dealing with them myself, in propria persona, sui juris. I didn’t answer their complaint. I filed a motion to dismiss. They responded with their own motion and then I filed a second motion. My contention is if one answers the complaint and admits that there was/is a contract the game is over and they win. I filed motion following NJ Court rules demanding that they follow NJ Court Rules and provide me and the court with a certified copy of the original Note and Mortgage contract or the original. They have yet to produce either one for obvious reasons, they can’t because they don’t have them. They also failed to follow NJ Court rules in their complaint because they failed to mention why Bank of America was named as a defendant as well as me.

Kent, I am curious as to what you received from Chase. Not sure what this means,

” I just received a letter from them dea celebrating my loan.”

Thanks for the clarification.

Sam

LLCs are picking up on the foreclosure business now – lending, foreclosing, selling and buying.
60 Minutes ran a story not long ago about foreigners using such corporations to launder money,
through unethical lawyers.
I wonder how heavy the LLC operations are.
NY DoS doesn’t know who the members are when they approve an LLC incorporation.
And IRS requests that if there is a Nominee of an unidentified entity, they should update info on their EINs. LoL!
Helping a friend who doesn’t have a lawyer and have found a corrupt judge, and fraud and forgery.

2.) Obtaining money or property by bogus cheques, the confidence game, or three card monte, sleight of hand, fortune-telling is punishable by imprisonment from one to ten years; obtaining goods from a warehouse, mill or wharf by FRAUDULENT RECEIPT wrongfully stating amount of goods deposited is punishable by imprisonment for not less than one & not more than 10 years.

Nothing that is redacted should be considered legal evidence of nothing but destruction of evidence, uttering, fraud & forgery under FALSE PRETENSES.

When mistakes on the face get made they must be corrected by re-entering the original with the proper correction made on the face of the original.

They would have to have the original to do that legally & no copies would suffice because they’re copying counterfeits by entering copies without entering the literal evidence itself.

The AFFIANT who is swearing they’re qualified to examine the purported loan file & have transacted business on behalf of the AFORESAID from the onset must be legally qualified to do so under the PROVISION OF THE ACT, (735 ILCS 5/13-214.2).

Thanks! I’ve been really busy.

Though I don’t believe electronic discovery is legal because the original written receipt is the only valid legal proof money changed hands, some judges let them enter their wallpaper to hide the ORIGINATION FRAUD.