Comments on: New York: Federal Natl Mtg Assoc v Higgins – Different Signatures Despite Same Date on Note Reflecting Copies of Different Originals

By: lvent

lvent — Mon, 20 Jun 2016 20:47:37 +0000

By security I mean the tort that proves the contract was performed upon.

Performance relies upon delivery so they need the BILL OF LADING which is the depository receipt.

Otherwise their suit is TORTUOUS FRAUDULENT REPRESENTATION.

By: lvent

lvent — Mon, 20 Jun 2016 20:41:19 +0000

The securities never existed therefore no contract can ever be produced.

By: mike Drouin

mike Drouin — Sat, 18 Jun 2016 09:47:09 +0000

A couple of more points to be made . Your promissory note and home , funded their scheme for obscene profits !!!! ( ASSET BACKED SECURITIES ) while YOU were in a ” securities contract and paying your Alleged Mortgage , you have a possessory right in the Note and a Proprietary right in the asset / home and a right to the money the thieves were making . They sure don’t want you knowing that !!! Also , because they used your personal property ( note) behind your back and without your permission , and have a possessory right in it , you have standing to pursue it into the bowels of any contract to find it !!!!

By: mike Drouin

mike Drouin — Sat, 18 Jun 2016 09:24:15 +0000

During the greatest acts of theft against the American Homeowners , the Banks have managed to allude being held accountable for their multiple crimes because in most cases you are arguing about the LIES ( FRAUD) that is necessary to cover for the BIG LIE told to every Homeowner involved .You have to cut the legs off of their argument , right out of the gate . What I mean by that is , in most cases the alleged original lender , is a STRAW MAN LENDER , an entity that did not lend you anything but was used to get your name on a promissory note to fuel their money sucking scheme !!! There is a ” secret lien holder ” , an investment bank that funded the loan with investor money to fuel the securitization process !! These bastards played both ends against the middle . They took your personal property (note) and used it for their personal use to make obscene profits ! It’s called , THE INTENTIONAL TORT OF CONVERSION and is illegal as hell !!! Because they created a securities contract behind your back and without your permission ( instead of a mortgage contract ) its FRAUD IN THE FACTUM and is subject to RESCISSION / CANCELLATION !!! Cancel the bogus mortgage contract , it’s an illusion of ownership !!! If you try arguing the Fraud / lies , like bogus assignments , signatures …..you will lose 99.9 % of the time !!!

By: lvent

lvent — Sat, 18 Jun 2016 03:18:57 +0000

Neil Cavuto of FOX said we might need new socials so clearly this issue is no secret.

Why it was done IMHO was to compromise the legitimacy of everything in the U.S. being genuine.

New socials would not legitimize the genuineness of things that don’t have legitimacy but it would give the credit brokers the cover up they want to keep their fraud going.

By: lvent

lvent — Sat, 18 Jun 2016 03:06:33 +0000

I have legal evidence in my possession of multiple frauds that begin with the ORIGINATION FRAUD which is quite frankly IDENTITY THEFT.

The issuer of that fraud took our social’s & placed them in the open where they could be unlawfully compromised by everyone imaginable so that crime is international.

Therefore, we could have no way of knowing who could have stolen it or what they’ve used it for behind our backs.