Comments on: Lawyer Fined $6,000 for Falsely Certifying Mortgage Documents

By: lvent

lvent — Sun, 07 Aug 2016 20:43:15 +0000

Moreover, how many crackheads who escaped the crackhouse got in cars & drove out of there?

That’s why they’re violating everyone elses legal rights to drive unlawfully so the crackheads who work for them don’t get noticed.

Just like in CHANCERY COURT in the DALEY CENTER when their lawyers blurt out in open court they’re going to RE-NOTICE THAT ONE UP what they’re really doing is hiding the real criminals by FALSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE.

By: lvent

lvent — Sun, 07 Aug 2016 20:30:47 +0000

I’ve been being treated like some common street hood by the criminals dictating their fraud like law hiding from within every level of government.

These mafia thugs think it’s conducive to criminalize the innocent by pretending we’re dead because that’s what they want.

I have stories galore entailing their INSIDE JOB upon my legal rights & what more can be said when OVER 200 CRACKHEADS ESCAPE CRACKHO– USE & I’m essentially being held hostage for being forced to exercise my constitutional legal rights to defend my TITLES.

http://m.youtube.com/?reload=14&rdm=203d3c2fr#/watch?v=GfaqzpXsPCo

By: lvent

lvent — Sat, 06 Aug 2016 22:32:55 +0000

THE GENERAL RULE IS THAT WHERE AUTHORITY IS GIVEN FOR ONE TO FILL IN BLANKS IN INSTRUMENT OTHER THAN AS AUTHORIZED CONSTITUES “FORGERY” WHERE THE OTHER ELEMENTS OF FORGERY ARE PRESENT PEOPLE -v- KUBANEK, 1939.

By: lvent

lvent — Sat, 06 Aug 2016 22:26:16 +0000

810 ILCS/ARTICLE 3 PART 4 – THE LIABILITIES OF PARTIES STATES A PERSON IS NOT LIABLE ON AN INSTRUMENT UNLESS (i.) THE PERSON SIGNED THE INSTRUMENT, OR (ii) THE PERSON IS PRESENTED BY AN AGENT OR REPRESENTATIVE WHO SIGNED THE INSTRUMENT AND THE SIGNATURE IS BINDING ON THE REPRESENTED PERSON UNDER SECTION 3-402.

By: lvent

lvent — Sat, 06 Aug 2016 03:59:55 +0000

The FC LIS PENDENS is FALSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE in every suit because we never conducted business with none of them & certainly not their lawyers who by FALSE REPRESENTATION record legal nullities because of the non-existent torts to the never performed upon contracts which make them ALTERATION OF EVIDENCE under RULE 19 because they’re blank trusts.

Not meeting the legal requisites under ARTICLE 3 of the UCC requires the NOTE be ENDORSED by the ISSUER otherwise it’s BANK FRAUD with fake INVESTMENT SECURITIES because they’re FILL IN THE BLANK NOTES that require the money be deposited by the ISSUER of the INVESTMENT upon the issuance of the SECURITY.

If they’re warehouse lines of credit then the source must not be fraudulently concealed regarding where the money was derived that created the SECURITY or that’s RACKETEERING by MONEY LAUNDERING.

FISHER & SHAPIRO didn’t record the FC LIS PENDS until 8 months from when they filed the FC which is INVESTMENT BROKERING FRAUD & therefore, they’re by FALSE REPRESENTATION, PHH MORTGAGE INVESTMENT BROKERS by hedging bets they can use DESTRUCTION OF EVIDENCE to unlawfully steal my TITLES by FALSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE because I never did business with them ever.