Comments on: Robo-Testifiers: Proof of Bank Attorney Involvement

By: lvent

lvent — Wed, 24 Aug 2016 01:21:16 +0000

That’s what I discovered by being forced to defend 2 FC’s myself PRO SE for the past 5 years in the most corrupt place there is.

By: lvent

lvent — Tue, 23 Aug 2016 22:33:33 +0000

The PLAINTIFF would be responsible for the DEPO of their own prosecuting witness because they entered the FORGERIES in the first place.

By: Randall Stephens

Randall Stephens — Tue, 23 Aug 2016 19:09:58 +0000

In my area depos of local witnesses typically run $2000. Deposing an out of state witness costs more. So at a minimum it would cost $124,000 in order to completely prepare for any witness that might be called by plaintiff.

I’m guessing plaintiff’s counsel knows all of this.

By: lvent

lvent — Tue, 23 Aug 2016 18:44:02 +0000

They’re IDENTITY THIEVES & they’re not fooling everyone.

By: lvent

lvent — Tue, 23 Aug 2016 18:41:02 +0000

There should be DEPOS by the TITLE COMPANY AGENT whose name is on the HUD 1 & was supposed to INDEMNIFY our TITLES to protect them from FRAUD.

My stolen social # 341-66-6698 was stolen by IDENTITY THEFT & they’re covering that up to hide their ELECTRONIC TRANSFERS which is CRIMINAL RACKETEERING by them.

By: lvent

lvent — Tue, 23 Aug 2016 17:46:35 +0000

They’re investors in their own FRAUD.

Moreover, the FRAUD INVESTORS use the legal system to settle personal VENDETTAS with whoever they decide to victimize for nothing whatsoever.

That’s how they unlawfully use INSURANCE FRAUD to CRIMINALLY UNDERMINE others.