<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: JAMES OBER v. TOWN OF LAUDERDALE-BY-THE-SEA: Lis Pendens Does Not Discharge Liens Placed After Final Judgment of Foreclosure	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://4closurefraud.org/2016/09/02/james-ober-v-town-of-lauderdale-by-the-sea-lis-pendens-does-not-discharge-liens-placed-after-final-judgment-of-foreclosure/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2016/09/02/james-ober-v-town-of-lauderdale-by-the-sea-lis-pendens-does-not-discharge-liens-placed-after-final-judgment-of-foreclosure/</link>
	<description>- Fighting Foreclosure Fraud BY SHARING THE KNOWLEDGE</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2016 04:23:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Alec		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2016/09/02/james-ober-v-town-of-lauderdale-by-the-sea-lis-pendens-does-not-discharge-liens-placed-after-final-judgment-of-foreclosure/#comment-665287</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alec]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2016 04:23:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=65343#comment-665287</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Banks will be a real pickle if the homeowner files a bankrupty before the auction simply to put
a temporary stop on it. Lenders will have to do a title search again to make sure no liens have
been recorded post-judgment and through the time the judge re-sets the foreclosure auction and through the time of the new auction date.  Such a lousy decision from the 4th DCA should
cause the legislature to quickly amend the lis pendens statue to supersede the 4th DCA opinion..]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Banks will be a real pickle if the homeowner files a bankrupty before the auction simply to put<br />
a temporary stop on it. Lenders will have to do a title search again to make sure no liens have<br />
been recorded post-judgment and through the time the judge re-sets the foreclosure auction and through the time of the new auction date.  Such a lousy decision from the 4th DCA should<br />
cause the legislature to quickly amend the lis pendens statue to supersede the 4th DCA opinion..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Alec		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2016/09/02/james-ober-v-town-of-lauderdale-by-the-sea-lis-pendens-does-not-discharge-liens-placed-after-final-judgment-of-foreclosure/#comment-665286</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alec]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2016 04:18:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=65343#comment-665286</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This is a terrible case for homeowners. Now lawyers for the banks will hotly object to judges
setting longer than 30 day sale dates. The judge will be required not to give the homeowner more time before letting the foreclosure auction take place. Hopefully the legislature will move quickly to amend the lis pendens law to allow the lis pendens to stay in effect until the auction
occurs.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a terrible case for homeowners. Now lawyers for the banks will hotly object to judges<br />
setting longer than 30 day sale dates. The judge will be required not to give the homeowner more time before letting the foreclosure auction take place. Hopefully the legislature will move quickly to amend the lis pendens law to allow the lis pendens to stay in effect until the auction<br />
occurs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
