<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: As Banks Continue to Foreclose with False Documents, Men Accused Of Taking Over Vacant Houses To Stand Trial	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://4closurefraud.org/2016/09/26/as-banks-continue-to-foreclose-with-false-documents-men-accused-of-taking-over-vacant-houses-to-stand-trial/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2016/09/26/as-banks-continue-to-foreclose-with-false-documents-men-accused-of-taking-over-vacant-houses-to-stand-trial/</link>
	<description>- Fighting Foreclosure Fraud BY SHARING THE KNOWLEDGE</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2016 00:12:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Vic Hentz		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2016/09/26/as-banks-continue-to-foreclose-with-false-documents-men-accused-of-taking-over-vacant-houses-to-stand-trial/#comment-668553</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vic Hentz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2016 00:12:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=65601#comment-668553</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot;Some people on the block figured out the new neighbors hadn’t acquired the house through 
normal channels and called (Alderman) O’Shea.&quot; 

Lets see now!

Someone moved into one of the four abandoned properties on my road. 
The siding was,fixed,damaged roof repaired,the lawn was 
mowed,seasonal decorations went up,nice people wave whenever 
I drive by, kids are polite. An eyesore had new a life and we had 
nice quiet neighbors living in it.

At no time did I question or CARE how the nice new neighbors acquired 
their property. It wasn&#039;t any of my business.
So I am wondering what prompted the neighbors in the article to &quot;figure out&quot; 
that the new family had not acquired their home thru &quot;normal channels.

Even when the politico and the jackboots went in the first time, 
they said that everything looked quite normal.

OH that&#039;s right. The neighborhood is WHITE and IRISH!
That woman and her daughter could have been Nobel laureates who bought
the place outright with their prize money and the fact that they were black would 
still have caused  the you-know-what to hit the fan!

I don&#039;t know if what these two jokers pulled off was legal or not, 
but considering how much the banksters have stolen from the rest of us, 
and how completely the parasites (that&#039;s politicians) and the sheriff&#039;s departments 
and the DA&#039;s and the judges are OWNED by the aforementioned banksters,
you would NOT want me on that jury.

In my book, a little pay back would be just fine!

And long overdue!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Some people on the block figured out the new neighbors hadn’t acquired the house through<br />
normal channels and called (Alderman) O’Shea.&#8221; </p>
<p>Lets see now!</p>
<p>Someone moved into one of the four abandoned properties on my road.<br />
The siding was,fixed,damaged roof repaired,the lawn was<br />
mowed,seasonal decorations went up,nice people wave whenever<br />
I drive by, kids are polite. An eyesore had new a life and we had<br />
nice quiet neighbors living in it.</p>
<p>At no time did I question or CARE how the nice new neighbors acquired<br />
their property. It wasn&#8217;t any of my business.<br />
So I am wondering what prompted the neighbors in the article to &#8220;figure out&#8221;<br />
that the new family had not acquired their home thru &#8220;normal channels.</p>
<p>Even when the politico and the jackboots went in the first time,<br />
they said that everything looked quite normal.</p>
<p>OH that&#8217;s right. The neighborhood is WHITE and IRISH!<br />
That woman and her daughter could have been Nobel laureates who bought<br />
the place outright with their prize money and the fact that they were black would<br />
still have caused  the you-know-what to hit the fan!</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know if what these two jokers pulled off was legal or not,<br />
but considering how much the banksters have stolen from the rest of us,<br />
and how completely the parasites (that&#8217;s politicians) and the sheriff&#8217;s departments<br />
and the DA&#8217;s and the judges are OWNED by the aforementioned banksters,<br />
you would NOT want me on that jury.</p>
<p>In my book, a little pay back would be just fine!</p>
<p>And long overdue!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Randall Stephens		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2016/09/26/as-banks-continue-to-foreclose-with-false-documents-men-accused-of-taking-over-vacant-houses-to-stand-trial/#comment-668518</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Randall Stephens]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2016 20:42:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=65601#comment-668518</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[There are powerful, legitimate counter arguments, affirmative defenses, counterclaims, etc., to what has been passing as foreclosures.  When properly applied adverse possession could be included among them.  

But Moore&#039;s unilateral redefinition (“We never said that we charged them rent,” he said. “We charged them improvement fees” [yeah, right]) doesn&#039;t cut it, and only undermines the credibility of those employing legitimate defenses, and claims.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are powerful, legitimate counter arguments, affirmative defenses, counterclaims, etc., to what has been passing as foreclosures.  When properly applied adverse possession could be included among them.  </p>
<p>But Moore&#8217;s unilateral redefinition (“We never said that we charged them rent,” he said. “We charged them improvement fees” [yeah, right]) doesn&#8217;t cut it, and only undermines the credibility of those employing legitimate defenses, and claims.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
