Comments on: WSJ: Defunct NJ ‘Foreclosure Mill’ Sues Wells Fargo Over Robo-Signing

By: Mike

Mike — Wed, 26 Oct 2016 02:35:47 +0000

It didn’t stop them from foreclosing on people’s homes until 2015 when they filed for bankruptcy knowing they still had fraudulent documents from every other banks they represented. I hope the courts take judicial notice of that. Never mind their in on it too. They still foreclose in New Jersey with documents created in 2010. The judges overlook what the Supreme Court put in place. I can’t believe the balls of this company. How does it feel to have the banks fuck you too you judas bastards. Rot in hell all you lawyers who represent the banks knowing you are helping banks commit fraud on the people and fraud on the court. You should be ashamed that you brought you’re profession to such a low level.

By: Tennessee Victim

Tennessee Victim — Mon, 24 Oct 2016 22:51:02 +0000

In reply to mike Drouin.

“The mortgages are the fraud!!!” Amen to that.
Most people NEVER know their mortgages were not recorded and.or were ‘creations’ after the fact.

By: Tennessee Victim

Tennessee Victim — Mon, 24 Oct 2016 22:47:31 +0000

Crocodile tears for the robo law firm that churns out foreclosures. Like Wilson and Associates in Arkansas and TN, they take little or NO responsibility for verifying they have any right to foreclose, churning them out well. . . . ..sort of like a well oiled conveyor or robo belt. When contacted they referred homeowners back to the servicer with the lament they are helpless to make any call much less delay a foreclosure date!. Follow the money, these suits do nothing for the victims defrauded, cheated out of their homes or the states registers or recorders cheated out of recording fees.. Having been through something similar, it is fact that neither law firm or servicer allowed truth, reality or legal rights deter them from stealing people’s homes in formal foreclosure. Particularly in non-judicial states where people who can’t afford to file suit have NO legal rights!

By: mike Drouin

mike Drouin — Mon, 24 Oct 2016 22:47:15 +0000

The whole problem with this is that the ” Lender ” never met the criteria of lender . All the Homeowners involved in this scam were never in a mortgage !! They were in an illegal securities contract funded a totally different way other than through the alleged Lender , and since they want to keep that their big secret in order to keep getting away with their scam , more than likely they will settle , and avoid litigation . This is the reason they needed so much robo-signing ! The Mortgages are the fraud !!!!!!!