There have been many reports of defendants receiving hearing notices AFTER the hearing was held.
Are they are omitting the dates so defendants miss their hearings but they can still claim the notice was sent?
Wanted: Envelopes like below which Foreclosing Mills are omitting postage meter dates. Here is an example. Remember together we can make a difference. Please send to StopForeclosureFraud@gmail.com
4closureFraud
Seams Provest has moved into Illinois, I was served in person and the next day by mail, they are located in Lombard Illinois. I also noticed on a piece of scrap paper left on my door with the heading “Habitat”. Low and behold I was leaving the store and saw a store called “Habitat”, “Open to the public, looks like they are selling items they stole from houses they trashed out. I will further investigate and see if its the same guy who served me, and take pictures of what ever is going on there. I smell a rat!!!! I will expose them for the piece’s of dung that they are. So I have a 2 atty’s foreclosing on me. One a mill (Provest) and 1 , an atty for MERS. I fully expect to be held in contemp!!!!!!! lOL
I have proofs of these envelopes with no date-stamp from the postage meter dating back to my pending foreclosure in June 2008, with the Florida Default Law Group of course. As it got closer to the actual foreclosure date (I fought them off in court for 11 months), the envelopes began appearing with no date stamp. I will scan copies of these and email them as requested. Anything I can do to help!
Just reading over my filings makes me angry all over again. In one complaint the FDLG tried to state that I had not showed up for a hearing, when I MOST CERTAINLY HAD! I sat in the hall and waited, and when the bailiff came out of the little room the judge was sitting in, he literally looked befuddled as to who I was and why I was sitting there. I said, I am __________, the homeowner defending her rights in case #____________.” Well, that send the bailiff scurrying back in to the judge’s room (it was like a conference room), and when they realized I was actually there — oops! — I was allowed in to state my case while the judge talked to me and the FDLG attorney who was “present” by telephone. Clearly they had been planning to rocket-docket my case even then, and this was back in November 2007. The fact that I showed up bought me about three or four months until the next round of hearings.
So the FDLG perjured themselves by claiming that I was no-show when I was really there. Of course I filed my response to their claim within the proper timeframe so they couldn’t catch me in a trap.
It will be fun suing them in Superior Court, which is what I plan to do if the AG’s office here in FL does nothing for people like me who have already lost their homes, long before it hit the news in a big was but still filled with all these forms of fraud.
All three samples from Stern. Only thing that’s surprising about that is that he has any clients left to send (or not send) notices on behalf of.
Fishman and Shapiro out of Tampa……MFSJ……filed at court 7/24……Mailed from Carol Stream, Illinois on the 23rd…at least it was dated…but hey..it was mailed when we said it was….JUST FROM CLEAR ACROSS THE CONTINENT…good thing I check my case online every morning……Should be a law against his type of thing!
Interesting to see the specimen envelopes from David J. Stern’s office. This operation is prosecuting a foreclosure action I am defending against, and the problem I am having with them is that they think it’s ok not to serve documents that they are filing with the Clerk! Their latest attempt at this was a motion for clerk’s default, in a case in which they knew there was an appearance and a defense. You have to wonder how much of this conduct this firm will get away with before some Court somewhere imposes a little bit of pain for it.
GREAT TOPIC! IT’S ABOUT TIME SOMEONE BROUGHT THESE DIRTY, UNDERHANDED TACTICS TO THE SURFACE… LET THEM SUFFER THE CONSEQUENCES
Chapter 895 (a): Offenses Concerning Racketeering & Illegal Debts: 895.01 – 895.05