Decided on April 16, 2010
Supreme Court, Suffolk County
Emigrant Mortgage Co. Inc., Plaintiff
against
Anthony J. Corcione and Jane Corcione, Defendants.
2009-28917
Joshua Deutsch, Esq.
Deutsch & Schneider L.L.P.
Attorneys for Plaintiff
79-37 Myrtle Avenue
Glendale, New York 11385
Sean C. Serpe, Esq.
Serpe & Associates, P.C.
Attorneys for Defendants
450 Seventh Avenue
New York, New York 10123
Jeffrey Arlen Spinner, J.
Upon reviewing the totality of the circumstances herein, this Court is driven to the inescapable conclusion that Plaintiff has, by way of calculation and pre-meditation (as evidenced by the terms of its carefully crafted Agreement), created a scenario whereby it is a virtual certainty that Defendants will ultimately be irreparably damaged and further, by way of the Agreement, has gone to extraordinary lengths in an attempt to insulate itself from liability while [*6]at the same time ensuring that it will not sustain any pecuniary loss and that all cost will be borne by Defendants. In short, the conduct of Plaintiff in this matter has been over-reaching, shocking, willful and unconscionable, is wholly devoid of even so much as a scintilla of good faith and cannot be countenanced by this Court.
In those rare instances where the conduct of a party is unconscionable, shocking or egregious, a Court of equity is vested with the power to award exemplary damages. Exemplary damages may lie in a situation where it is necessary to both effectuate punishment as well as to deter the offending party from engaging in such reprehensible conduct in the future. Such an award may also be made to address, as so ably enunciated by our Court of Appeals in Home Insurance Co. v. American Home Products Corp. 75 NY2d 196, 550 NE2d 930, 551 NYS2d 481 (1989) “…gross misbehavior for the good of the public…on the ground of public policy”. Indeed, exemplary damages are intended to have a deterrent effect upon conduct which is unconscionable, egregious, deliberate and inequitable, I.H.P. Corp. v. 210 Central Park South Corp. 12 NY2d 329, 189 NE2d 812, 239 NYS2d 547 (1963).
Under the unique circumstances of this matter, the Court determines that Plaintiff be forever barred and prohibited from collecting any of the claimed interest accrued on the loan between the date of default and March 1, 2010, that Plaintiff be barred and prohibited from recovering any claimed legal fees and expenses as well as any and all claimed advances to date and further that Plaintiff’s debt be determined at this time to be no more than the principal balance of $ 301,721.58. The Court also determines that the imposition of exemplary damages upon Plaintiff is equitable, necessary and appropriate, both in light of Plaintiff’s shockingly inequitable, bad faith conduct as well as to serve as an appropriate deterrent to any future outrageous, improper and wrongful activities.
The Court hereby fixes the amount of exemplary damages in the sum of $ 100,000.00, recoverable by Defendants from Plaintiff.
For all of the foregoing reasons, it is, therefore [*7]
ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that Plaintiff’s application for summary judgment and appointment of a Referee is denied; and it is further
ORDERED , ADJUDGED and DECREED that Plaintiff, its successors, assigns and others are forever barred, foreclosed and prohibited from demanding, collecting or attempting to collect, directly or indirectly, any and all of the sums in this proceeding delineated as interest, default interest, attorney’s fees, legal fees, costs, disbursements, advances or any sums other than the principal balance, that may have accrued from May 1, 2008 up to the date of this Order; and it is further
ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that Defendants ANTHONY J. CORCIONE and JANE CORCIONE residing at 66 Circle Drive, East Northport, New York 11731 recover judgment against Plaintiff EMIGRANT MORTGAGE COMPANY INC. with an office located at 5 East 42nd Street, New York, New York 10017 in the principal sum of $ 100,000.00 representing exemplary damages, and that Defendants have execution therefor. The Clerk of Suffolk County is directed to enter judgment accordingly.
This shall constitute the Decision, Judgment and Order of the Court.
Dated: April 16, 2010
Riverhead, New York
ENTER:
______________________________________
JEFFREY ARLEN SPINNER, J.S.C.
Read the entire order below…
4closureFraud
Emigrant Mortgage Co. Inc. Plaintiff Against Anthony J. Corcione and Jane Corcione Defendants
This decision was vacated and voided by Judge Spinner, by a subsequent Court Order which in the end commended the bank and law firm for their efforts.
[…] everywhere from Reuters (“Hero of the day: Jeffrey Spinner“) to the blog 4closureFraud Another NY Style beat down“) to London’s Daily Mail (“Couple’s £370,000 mortgage wiped out by judge […]
I am a California homeowner in trouble, I have an arm loan with HSBC. They refuse to give me a permanant fixed rate solution. I wasn’t aware that I had an arm loan that would ski rocket from 4.6 to 10.6. Does anyone know of a lawyer in California that “gets it” ? Judge Spinner is my hero. What a man of integrity and character. Just a good person and upstanding leader doing the right thing. Is any aware of any Judges in California with the same integrity, tired of lies, games and fraud by banks? If any kind point me in the right drection for aggressive help. Please let me know.
KevinHomeLoan@yahoo.com
Try Martin Meddleman (“http://mandelman.ml-implode.com/) Also check out Foreclosure Hamlet for a sourse of info or our page on face book- Occupy Foreclosures NW. Lots of info available if you look. Knowlege is power.Good luck!
-michelle
Is this judge licensed in FL too? Can we bring him here?
No, you can’t have him. We only have two, this judge and Judge Schack
in Brooklyn. You have a few good ones in Florida (Jeff Barnes, Matt Weidner, April Charney, Dawn Rappoport)just to name a few. We have a lot of problems here!!!