With that, this is quite interesting and James, they are not “major law firm’s” they have been welped and feed their entire careers on the teet of the taxpayers … they are financed by you and every other hard working TAXPAYER who is just hanging on. Now as Americans let’s FIOA the depositions of theses two FORECLOSURE BARONS!

On further reading, including he complaint at the bottom, I think, since so much runs through American Home Mortgage Service books, and they are one of the entities who actually hire the law firms on behalf of the alleged note holders…. Yes, the depo would be interesting, but it is probably more about the claim to fees and files, although the documents requested would be fascinating. Another case where reading the depo is probably less interesting than examining the exhibits for ones self.

OK, now I have read a good bit of it.

ALL S&F and Stern documents and communication with Scott Barns, LPS, SLS etc.
WOW would that be a treasure trove !!

Wow, you are right, these are some very heavy weight law firms having a slugging match. There is no way this would come to trial. To many skeletons on both sides, and to much real money at risk.

What would you give to be a fly on the wall at Show and Tell, (mediation) ??

Discovery request for relevant and admissible evidence or what “may lead” to relevant and admissible evidence.

Based on the pleadings and motions that are probably not sealed, and based on the issues raised one could infer that reading the depo may lead to evidence that is relevant to your action.

A court would not grant you access to the sealed record if it was only to impeach the deposed with prior statements made under oath, so I am sure you will be careful to avoid that argument when constructing your motion for the court to grant you access, attorneys eyes only of course.

You are a hoot!