The land records across America have been corrupted beyond repair. Financial institutions who are strangers to any contractual relationship with American citizens are alleging secured debts and instituting foreclosures based on those allegations. These financial institutions are fabricating the necessary paperwork including promissory note endorsements, assignments of mortgage, affidavits, and other “evidence” of a debt which they can not prove and does not exist in relation to the foreclosing entity.

When this truth is fully revealed the shock will be unimaginable.

The execs of these financial institutions should be under federal indictment instead of being rewarded by kangaroo courts.

Lisa Epstein
FoerclosureHamlet.org

Remember, don’t drink and drive especially if you are a judge or a foreclosure mill attorney. Stay off drugs, too!

In case anyone is able to post anything at WSJ, here is the link to Judge Colton’s unethical, illegal and brazen display http://www.scribd.com/doc/36808179/Rocket-Docket-101-Judges-Against-the-Backlog-Unite-Transcript

In case you don’t realize that announcing the outcomes before a hearing begins is wrong, there are a few cases on it that these rocket docket judges and foreclosure mill attorneys should know. Legal proceedings must be conducted before an impartial judge who affords the parties a full and fair hearing at which they have the opportunity to hear and present witnesses and evidence. See for example, Robbins v. Robbins, 429 So.2d 424, 426-431 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1983).

“Due process requirements must be met.” Id. at 429 citing, Shillitani v. United States, 384 U.S. 364, 86 S.Ct. 1531, 16 L.Ed.2d 622 (1966). “A fundamental due process requirement is a hearing, one that may be neither sham nor pretense.” Id. citing, Palko v. Connecticut, 302 U.S. 319, 58 S.Ct. 149, 82 L.Ed. 288 (1937). “Due process mandates that “state action, whether through one agency or another, shall be consistent with the fundamental principles of liberty and justice which lie at the base of all our civil and political institutions….” Id. citing, Herbert v. Louisiana, 272 U.S. 312, 317, 47 S.Ct. 103, 104, 71 L.Ed. 270, 273 (1926).

Violation of a right made specific by statutes, rules or settled interpretations of them which is a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 242 which provides criminal penalties for a deprivation of rights under color of law. U.S. v. Lanier, 520 U.S. 259, 267 (1997).

Ignoring evidence and conducting shame hearings with pre-determined outcomes is a violation of due process, and even judges get prosecuted when enough people figure out that they are favoring one side and violating the law. By the way, Lanier is about a judge being prosecuted.

Those rocket docket judges might want to start following the law since a large number of prosecutors, Congressmen, and legislators have started listening to the millions of Americans who have been ripped off by the banksters, and there are a large number of prosecutions in the works. Yes, the banksters were so stupid and greedy that they screwed members of law enforcement, too. By the way, violating rights under color of law gives rise to both criminal and civil liability, and judges who act without jurisdiction don’t even enjoy the unconstitutional protection of the judicially created doctrine of judicial immunity.

I smell perp sweat, don’t you?

It is sad that even how hard to trying to perfect our legal system, there is just no such thing!

Everything boils down to what the famous saying goes.. “Prevention is better than cure”